@pianoplanepianorocket
Well... you said that you tried making it, so I asked what you had done. I would rather not tell you what you had already done :)
@CC1010 spiked tires would have been better, like the winter tires on the B-36. Tracks with the thingies that pop out could work too. Might freeze and lock though
@Ryn176 oh no. That means that, if you don't have one, you'll have to contact someone with it and ask them to test it
.
Do these rotators move without VR input? Like a regular rotator?
@Kakhikotchauri1 true, true. I saw one or two mods that have SCRIPTS that can be implemented. I just meant like the overarching code cannot interact with the app in certain ways, because it breaks the agreement. I think it was like 16 bit or something
@UmbrellaCorporation you... you do know that SimplePlanes is not allowed to let mods interact with the app on mobile, right?
That's why there are no mobile mods. Google Play and the App Store both redid their agreements that basically mean that outside sources cannot interact with the app. I hope this helps
@FeatherWing okay, cool!
I just meant like, picture the Huey. It has the guns, but it can pick up troops. My aircraft would have machine guns, but it can land in the heat of a battle and pick up injured militants
.
But cool! Thanks
This is freaking amazing. I think I know how you do it too. Cylinders attached to a fluid piece, and all the cylinders are on a split-second delay from one another, with cyclic on
@jamesPLANESii good point! Thanks!
.
I might start working on these gear. I want to get them as close to the real thing as plausible. The two joints, and the suspension system. I need it to line up with the bay though, so I can't start yet
@asteroidbook345 okay, cool! Thank you so much
.
I don't want to copy yours lol. Mine is gonna be completely paneled
But I like your system. The B-36 had a much different system though, so it'll be cool to learn from
I need to work on making good landing gear
.
When the update comes out, I'm going to start making a B-36 that hopefully has some form of quality close to this. I just suck at XML, and also at making Landing Gear lol
But as WolfSpark said, it could only carry one at a time. The Enola Gay targeted Hiroshima and dropped Little Boy. Three days later when Japan refused to Surrender, they sent the Bockscar after Yokohama (Tokyo) with Fat Man on board. They, however, found technical difficulties and dropped the bomb on Nagasaki instead
Is this supposed to be an F-104? I assume so because 1, the design, and 2, the speed.
Either way, what exactly needs to be fixed?
.
Also, try making custom gear. The stock gear look horrid on a replica
As many people have stated below, it would be SUPER useful to have more than 8 input values. Or maybe if we could have a customizable HUD for the standard SP, because the VR players are already going to basically have that in front of them. Not sure how this could be implemented though. Thanks
This is horrid. The B-50 Superfortress had a variant with jet pods, but this... this is just physically implausible, and nonetheless, you didn't ask the previous builder for permission
@realSavageMan and yeah lmao. I need to check them out. I never saw them. I didn't start following you until a few days ago, so... yeah. You have some super high quality, badass builds. You deserve the 300K. Godspeed, lad
Andrew Garrison pokes Tu-95 confirmed
XD
What in the hell did I just watch...
Furthermore, there's like 5 different ways to do it
.
Are you making a propeller aircraft, or a jet aircraft?
@pianoplanepianorocket
Well... you said that you tried making it, so I asked what you had done. I would rather not tell you what you had already done :)
What did you try doing?
@CC1010 spiked tires would have been better, like the winter tires on the B-36. Tracks with the thingies that pop out could work too. Might freeze and lock though
Because if so, it will be a lot easier to check out, then
@Ryn176 oh no. That means that, if you don't have one, you'll have to contact someone with it and ask them to test it
+2.
Do these rotators move without VR input? Like a regular rotator?
This is amazing!!
.
TTTTT
@Kakhikotchauri1 true, true. I saw one or two mods that have SCRIPTS that can be implemented. I just meant like the overarching code cannot interact with the app in certain ways, because it breaks the agreement. I think it was like 16 bit or something
@UmbrellaCorporation you... you do know that SimplePlanes is not allowed to let mods interact with the app on mobile, right?
That's why there are no mobile mods. Google Play and the App Store both redid their agreements that basically mean that outside sources cannot interact with the app. I hope this helps
@FeatherWing okay, cool!
I just meant like, picture the Huey. It has the guns, but it can pick up troops. My aircraft would have machine guns, but it can land in the heat of a battle and pick up injured militants
.
But cool! Thanks
Okay, so if I made something that acts as both a gunship and medevac, kinda like a UH-1, is that okay?
I have a tiltrotor design
Okay, sorry to keep doing this. School has gotten in the way again. I PROMISE to have the scores posted and released by next weekend
@Korsamnang that was already added, mate
@rexzion I was thinking the same thing lol
@ReinMcDeer YESSSS
@Stinkypinky lmao
+4.
waving hands up and down in VR
Mom: honey, what are you doing?
kid: I'M A BIRD
THIS IS AMAZING
Will there be camera changing? So you can like control multiple things in flight in VR?
What is your social security number?
@F104Deathtrap thanks!!
I'm gonna try and make it work though lmao
@CenturyAerospace yeahhh
@KnightOfRen yezz. The best advice
Lots of torque though lmao
This is freaking amazing. I think I know how you do it too. Cylinders attached to a fluid piece, and all the cylinders are on a split-second delay from one another, with cyclic on
+1@jamesPLANESii good point! Thanks!
.
I might start working on these gear. I want to get them as close to the real thing as plausible. The two joints, and the suspension system. I need it to line up with the bay though, so I can't start yet
@asteroidbook345 fair, fair
Yours does, never said it didn't. I think I understand how to do this now. Thanks
@Nerfaddict lmao
@asteroidbook345 posted an image of the B-36's main gear (I'm not too worried about the nose gear lol)
@asteroidbook345 okay, cool! Thank you so much
.
I don't want to copy yours lol. Mine is gonna be completely paneled
But I like your system. The B-36 had a much different system though, so it'll be cool to learn from
I need to work on making good landing gear
.
When the update comes out, I'm going to start making a B-36 that hopefully has some form of quality close to this. I just suck at XML, and also at making Landing Gear lol
This is amazing
But as WolfSpark said, it could only carry one at a time. The Enola Gay targeted Hiroshima and dropped Little Boy. Three days later when Japan refused to Surrender, they sent the Bockscar after Yokohama (Tokyo) with Fat Man on board. They, however, found technical difficulties and dropped the bomb on Nagasaki instead
+1The bomb bay also had to be retrofitted. It couldn't carry them normally. The bomb bays were designed for conventional weaponry
+2AHHHHHGH
Is this supposed to be an F-104? I assume so because 1, the design, and 2, the speed.
+1Either way, what exactly needs to be fixed?
.
Also, try making custom gear. The stock gear look horrid on a replica
@Default4 thanks dude!! I might need help with the constant speed code for the props
@PapaKernels lmao. Yup
+1.
And fineee. Maybe you're right...
@rexzion plane stuffs
@PapaKernels
As many people have stated below, it would be SUPER useful to have more than 8 input values. Or maybe if we could have a customizable HUD for the standard SP, because the VR players are already going to basically have that in front of them. Not sure how this could be implemented though. Thanks
+14Nice plane! Custom gear would make it a lot better, but the construction is great. Good job
@210100 ahhh. Only 2 SUPERfortresses. There are 10 airworthy B-17s
This is horrid. The B-50 Superfortress had a variant with jet pods, but this... this is just physically implausible, and nonetheless, you didn't ask the previous builder for permission
+1This is dope!!
Reminds me of the British electric experiment, or the NF-104 lol
+2@realSavageMan pretty sexy ngl lol
.
I think the history of how a builder's quality increases always is fascinating to me
@realSavageMan and yeah lmao. I need to check them out. I never saw them. I didn't start following you until a few days ago, so... yeah. You have some super high quality, badass builds. You deserve the 300K. Godspeed, lad
+1