@JuanShot2Go I just realized I phrased what I said horribly
Much like the B-36 or FR-1, this aircraft would have used the props as the main. The jets wouldn't have provided sufficient thrust to truly fly normally, but really just a controlled glide. They could work together to significantly improve performance, at the downfall of a lot of fuel consumption. The jets were for take off or interception/going to altitude
@DieLoaf oh, I'm making mine from scratch lol. I just meant that this line of aircraft are really cool imo
.
but ofc! I took it for a spin and it is wonderful to fly
@JuanShot2Go thanks!!
.
So Kaiser-Fleetwings was a failing company, and they wanted something really stupendously powerful for the era.
The jets and props were mostly just for take off and maneuvering for dogfighting and/or catching the enemy, as the jets consume way too much fuel
.
The navy didn't like the complexity of the nacelles
@Captiandaves fair
.
But nonetheless, there's an agreement with the play store services that doesn't allow external modifications to be installed. It's not the dev's fault
And RADAR is an acronym, I recently found out
RA-dio D-etection A-nd R-anging
.
Anyways, sorry for nerding out lol. I love Quantum Mechanics. This post is amazing! Great explanation
@Bobyo those are alpha particulates
.
It's kinda like why Microwaves are technically Radio waves AND Infrared waves. They accelerate other particles, and also can transmit data in short bursts (but more data at once than Radio waves), so they are unique, but still technically Radio waves
.
Gamma waves are dense enough to be considered particles, and are ranged in size and intensity with Alpha, Beta, and of course, Gamma. They each interact with matter differently due to their different masses and how much space they take up. Because remember, EM waves are both particulate as well as a wave. That's why light interacts with electricity and magnetic fields.
.
So TECHNICALLY, we could in theory use gamma waves to block out signals, but it would be a better weapon than detection aide lol.
boom! I got ya to bronze
.
Also, would a MiG 13 count?
It was a mixed-propulsion prototype that was powered by a piston engine that powered a motorjet to achieve the first 500+ MPH speeds in Russia. It was never put into active service though
@Chickendude @BeastHunter a lot of VR players say they wish more people added it to the rotation on the stick (of course, this doesn't work well on yokes and such)
Irl, it would be on the foot pedals, but VR does not encompass full body tracing yet... sadly
This is absolutely ingenious, dude!!
I love it. Imma take 'er for a spin!
.
One thing to mention though, the swept wings look dope, but I'm not too sure it would be used around the WW1 era. But either way, this is designed really well
Sorry, that was a lot lol
.
I want to design an aircraft, so I want to make sure you want like traditional fighters like P-51s or F4Us, or if you're okay with stretching it to like Messerschmitt BF 219 planes
@LegnaK how strict are you on the idea of a "fighter?"
.
Like do interceptors count? Or heavy fighters, much like the German anti-bomber fighters?
.
And with that latter part, granted you're okay with heavy fighters, could I put a 75mm cannon on it? The US and Germany tested using antitank cannons on their heavy fighters to destroy bombers
@V lmao. I was being serious
I've been sick, so the drugs are making me talk and make no sense. Well, not that I was any better without it lol
.
I'm being serious, because my props keep breaking on manual pitch
Does a P-2E Neptune count? 😏
+1P2V Neptune
Happy birthday!!
+2For 1, the propellers are 199 Inches each (16 feet, 7 inches)
.
And for 2, they are 4-bladed, black, with a yellow tip
Lookin good!
I will ask, however, are the propellers and engines staying like they are in the screenshot?
@PapaKernels yep XD
+1@PapaKernels...
+1Back in the old days. The first project you helped me on
CRAP CRAP DID NOT MEAN TO UPLOAD THIS PUBLICLY
@PapaKernels
@indevinfdev yes
Sorry, that was my bad saying Russia lol. Soviet Russia
.
And cool!
And sweet!
+1@Kangy yep! I'm gonna make a heavy tank
@Kangy oh, cool!
I just was curious
Kangy, do you have VR?
@PapaKernels thanks for spotting this, mate! I wanna do something for this. Probably a tank
+2@JuanShot2Go I just realized I phrased what I said horribly
+1Much like the B-36 or FR-1, this aircraft would have used the props as the main. The jets wouldn't have provided sufficient thrust to truly fly normally, but really just a controlled glide. They could work together to significantly improve performance, at the downfall of a lot of fuel consumption. The jets were for take off or interception/going to altitude
Lmao
@ShinyGemsBro ... no 😑
XA-38 Grizzly!
+1Thanks! @Sergio666 @BeastHunter
+2Wait... wasn't this an 8 engine? 2 2,675 IbF jet engines and then the 6 BMW radials
+1.
But anyways, awesome job!!! This looks amazing!
Ja!!
+2And I wouldn't mind being a test subject 😏😁
@DieLoaf oh, I'm making mine from scratch lol. I just meant that this line of aircraft are really cool imo
.
but ofc! I took it for a spin and it is wonderful to fly
I might be making its predecessor sometime soon, the P-2E
Fantastic build!! I love it!
This is a super unique idea! If I have freetime later, I'll take part!
@JuanShot2Go thanks!!
.
So Kaiser-Fleetwings was a failing company, and they wanted something really stupendously powerful for the era.
The jets and props were mostly just for take off and maneuvering for dogfighting and/or catching the enemy, as the jets consume way too much fuel
.
The navy didn't like the complexity of the nacelles
@Captiandaves fair
.
But nonetheless, there's an agreement with the play store services that doesn't allow external modifications to be installed. It's not the dev's fault
@Captiandaves mods aren't avaliable on mobile lmao
+1.
And why ask here?
@Korzalerke no, I think they just meant making a nozzle. It's not that hard. But I agree with what you said, we need a built in one
+1@Bobyo lmao. You're good
.
Kurzgesagt is awesome
.
And RADAR is an acronym, I recently found out
RA-dio D-etection A-nd R-anging
.
Anyways, sorry for nerding out lol. I love Quantum Mechanics. This post is amazing! Great explanation
@Bobyo those are alpha particulates
.
It's kinda like why Microwaves are technically Radio waves AND Infrared waves. They accelerate other particles, and also can transmit data in short bursts (but more data at once than Radio waves), so they are unique, but still technically Radio waves
.
Gamma waves are dense enough to be considered particles, and are ranged in size and intensity with Alpha, Beta, and of course, Gamma. They each interact with matter differently due to their different masses and how much space they take up. Because remember, EM waves are both particulate as well as a wave. That's why light interacts with electricity and magnetic fields.
.
So TECHNICALLY, we could in theory use gamma waves to block out signals, but it would be a better weapon than detection aide lol.
boom! I got ya to bronze
.
Also, would a MiG 13 count?
It was a mixed-propulsion prototype that was powered by a piston engine that powered a motorjet to achieve the first 500+ MPH speeds in Russia. It was never put into active service though
@Chickendude @BeastHunter a lot of VR players say they wish more people added it to the rotation on the stick (of course, this doesn't work well on yokes and such)
+2Irl, it would be on the foot pedals, but VR does not encompass full body tracing yet... sadly
This is absolutely ingenious, dude!!
I love it. Imma take 'er for a spin!
.
One thing to mention though, the swept wings look dope, but I'm not too sure it would be used around the WW1 era. But either way, this is designed really well
@JustArif нет! Слава Андоснии
+2@PapaKernels you're good lmao
This is dope!!
+1What happened to my B-36? 😢
.
Kidding lol
@LegnaK okay, thanks!
Sorry, that was a lot lol
.
I want to design an aircraft, so I want to make sure you want like traditional fighters like P-51s or F4Us, or if you're okay with stretching it to like Messerschmitt BF 219 planes
@LegnaK how strict are you on the idea of a "fighter?"
.
Like do interceptors count? Or heavy fighters, much like the German anti-bomber fighters?
.
And with that latter part, granted you're okay with heavy fighters, could I put a 75mm cannon on it? The US and Germany tested using antitank cannons on their heavy fighters to destroy bombers
@Juniovietnam they didn't, it was a policy with Google play and the app store
+1@V lmao. I was being serious
+2I've been sick, so the drugs are making me talk and make no sense. Well, not that I was any better without it lol
.
I'm being serious, because my props keep breaking on manual pitch
@BeastHunter THERE'S A MAXRPM VALUE. OMG THIS HELPS SO MUCH
+3Is this the DC-10?
Wait...
What does the rest of the aircraft look like?
@BeastHunter mmm. Good idea
+2@ChamDel7 @X99STRIKER
+4Based on speech patterns, my guesstimate is 11 years of age
Welp. The mods are gonna come get ya, mate. You got what you wanted