Question: Can we share an unlisted Entry to help out and improve the aircraft? Or does that go against the "Your build must be new, no old planes are allowed" rule?
@DanDaFreakinMan I would say you could change the Hinge rotators for a less extreme pitch Control, but remember that you gotta have the same total values on the neck and tail, let's say the neck hinges are all on 10 degrees, that's 40 degrees total, so the Tail must have 40 degrees too.
@DanDaFreakinMan Found the problem, I'm using rotators for the Roll controls, something might have gone wrong and now the left side rotators aren't turning opposite to the one on the right.
Change the "Invert" option on the left rotators to "yes", it should do it.
@SPairforce It's because this thing makes me angry, because of an in-joke this thing gets +150 upvotes and at least 20 spotlights, while me and many other mid-skilled creators get barely 10 upvotes for something we tried out best to look good.
@Diloph Honestly I didn't think I would have made such a strange design with just the old original blocks, thanks for the challenge.
I'll be later be uploading a different design to this one I originally started with, but considered too big for the challenge, of course, it's won't be a challenge entry.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, certo, as Únicas superfícies aerodinâmicas são as asas bem de fora, a placas que ligam as fuselagens não tem física de voo aplicada, ou pelo menos não deveriam ter.
Thank you for making this, I'll using it for a small project.
IS that a KV-6 converted to Sea Operations?
Has incredible looks.
Now I'm curious as to how you'll implement a powerplant without ruining it's lines by a huge margin.
+2Looks mean.
WE FINALLY GOT GLASS! How exactly we had Jet technology before knowing how to heat up sand is unknown tho.
Also, finally I can make Nukes without some Fuselage mumbo jumbo.
+3@SimplwMecanix Oh okay.
Why don't the fuselage cylinders connect properly?
+1Hey, just wanted to say I already uploaded mine.
+1@Mage2IsTriggered Then Next-Gen HESA Saeqeh, to be more precise.
Overgrown F-5 Tiger.
@ollielebanania https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1Ew55q/Swing-Wing-Prototype-1
The front landing still needs more work.
@ollielebanania unfortunately, I don't have an Instagram account.
Thanks tho.
@ollielebanania thank you.
Could I send it to you? Or could I just drop the link here?
Feels good enough for what it has to offer.
Looks damn good.
@TheLittlestTeaCup No, that joke of a plane still exists.
Question: Can we share an unlisted Entry to help out and improve the aircraft? Or does that go against the "Your build must be new, no old planes are allowed" rule?
Would you be interested in redoing it using the new Cannon part?
@Raptor77 Huh, they're not actually bombs...
They're outside mounted Aiming pods, actually.
What's the difference between this and the original one?
@18211292358 Uh, yes, congratulations you can discern two completely different aircrafts.
@DanDaFreakinMan I would say you could change the Hinge rotators for a less extreme pitch Control, but remember that you gotta have the same total values on the neck and tail, let's say the neck hinges are all on 10 degrees, that's 40 degrees total, so the Tail must have 40 degrees too.
@DanDaFreakinMan Found the problem, I'm using rotators for the Roll controls, something might have gone wrong and now the left side rotators aren't turning opposite to the one on the right.
Change the "Invert" option on the left rotators to "yes", it should do it.
Why some XML codes lack Default values?
+1@BigChunguss Sorry, but this wasn't the one I entered, this one was a mistake, I entered the Heinrack P-103.
@FLOWRIDER0 In space, no one can hear the gunshot.
Shouldn't it have the Black Boobomb insignia? I mean Pink Boobombs only launch Mario around.
@Diloph No, I should've explained better.
"Also your the first person I saw who used the right (too)"
Is there a word missing between "right" and "(too)"?
@SPairforce It's because this thing makes me angry, because of an in-joke this thing gets +150 upvotes and at least 20 spotlights, while me and many other mid-skilled creators get barely 10 upvotes for something we tried out best to look good.
+5@TurtlesThatFly Seems comprehensive enough, what a hell show.
This thing doesn't deserve this amount of attention for such a retarded joke.
+2@Diloph Right... What?
Use Fuselage Cylinders, they give you more freedom of shaping the aircraft and can give you more fuel.
@EternalDarkness What exactly is happening here? Why is this thing getting so many upvotes?
Who let this happen?
+2@Diloph this is the other aircraft I mentioned.
@Diloph Honestly I didn't think I would have made such a strange design with just the old original blocks, thanks for the challenge.
I'll be later be uploading a different design to this one I originally started with, but considered too big for the challenge, of course, it's won't be a challenge entry.
Why was this challenge spotlighted AFTER it finished?
Looks great, the intakes could be bit more open tho.
+1So... Why exactly we don't have that here?
+8@Raptor77 Will test out later, thanks for chiming in.
@Raptor77 Where's your aircraft? I try to access it but the site only says it was removed.
@BnanaX Ah tem, BR ta em tudo que é quanto.
Brasileiro é Cidadão do Mundo.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, certo, as Únicas superfícies aerodinâmicas são as asas bem de fora, a placas que ligam as fuselagens não tem física de voo aplicada, ou pelo menos não deveriam ter.
+1@GiuliMBorgesYT sou Brasileiro também.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, sério? Beleza então, pode me explicar em Português.
Wing roots need to be smaller, and the Tail needs to be closed.
But, over all, it's good.
@GiuliMBorgesYT I can do the first thing, but lack knowledge of what the second means.
@GiuliMBorgesYT I guess you're right.
What could I have done to "unfloppy" it?
Why don't you try finding a few challenges? There's always one or two happening.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Sorry for the lacking Flying Capabilities.
Was it mostly due to the take off procedures? I have now written instructions for it.
Did you take this from a Cursed Aircraft subreddit?