@ACEPILOT109 I think his point is that the only difference between this post and its predecessor is colour. What he doesn't understand is that the predecessor is unlisted and his point is therefore invalid
Since my quadcopter did terribly, (it was specifically designed for the challenge lol) I decided to make a ground assault plane that would do a bit better. Now this can easily take out everything if you can aim well enough
Yeah, never buy EPO aircraft if you can help it. If it was EPP, everything would bounce back to shape and would be easily glued together with no issues afterwards. I know products made of EPO are described as tough by their manufacturers but they are blatantly lying. EPP planes like the Bonsai and Reaktor are far better value for money and can take hits you wouldn’t believe.
@MethaManAircraft I had a look at it but it's a bit beyond me. I can't figure out where nudged parts are attached so I can't easily edit it. It would be easier for me to create something similar from scratch
Needs real suspension or just default wheel suspension. Wheels on a shock is simply not robust or functional enough. Have a look at different suspension types and try to recreate it
Please do! Fill out the “join us” form on the website (link is up above) and @mikoyanster should handle it. If it takes too long, I’ll send you an instant invite to the discord group @Caveman999
Simple planes has horrific stall simulations and no propwash simulation at all so 3D planes aren’t possible using traditional building methods. Workarounds are possible with gyros, RCS, etc but it won’t be like the real thing
Anyone can join as long as you are interested in aviation and won’t cause a ruckus. I have no idea when the next meeting will be but we do have a basic plan of what it will be. If you want to join, complete the form on the website (I think I linked it up above) and you’ll soon get invited to the discord @ThePilotDude
All aggressive entities cease fire when you are "critically damaged" so you don’t have missiles continually hitting your separated cockpit. It also means you can watch your aircraft fall from the sky in a fiery blaze instead of being bombarded by machine gun fire until there is nothing left. It also means ejecting a pylon breaks the whole system @stig27
@jamesPLANESii Yes. I initiated hostilities and they started attacking, I jettisoned weapons and they stopped. I even blew the carrier and one destroyer with guns and the other destroyer didn't care. If I don't jettison bombs and missiles, they continue attacking
If you have overload or an XML editor, you’ll be able to find a control surface deflection value. As for fine tuning size, I’ve never had much success. @atgxtg
Probably a system of a pendulum attached to control wires. Just make sure the weight of the pendulum can overcome the flight forces on control surfaces @ThePrototype
@SaturnV To join the Dark Falcons Discord server, click here
@ACEPILOT109 I think his point is that the only difference between this post and its predecessor is colour. What he doesn't understand is that the predecessor is unlisted and his point is therefore invalid
How about a Long-EZ style business jet
@F104Deathtrap Wow that thing is bad
Correct @atgxtg
Which platform do you use?
Thanks! @Hyattorama
Thanks for the spotlight! @mikoyanster
Anything go wrong for you? @PPLLAANNEE
Since my quadcopter did terribly, (it was specifically designed for the challenge lol) I decided to make a ground assault plane that would do a bit better. Now this can easily take out everything if you can aim well enough
Yeah, never buy EPO aircraft if you can help it. If it was EPP, everything would bounce back to shape and would be easily glued together with no issues afterwards. I know products made of EPO are described as tough by their manufacturers but they are blatantly lying. EPP planes like the Bonsai and Reaktor are far better value for money and can take hits you wouldn’t believe.
@MethaManAircraft I had a look at it but it's a bit beyond me. I can't figure out where nudged parts are attached so I can't easily edit it. It would be easier for me to create something similar from scratch
@randomusername That was fast! I hadn't even finished the description yet
It looks a bit like UAV Futures original $99 build. Please don’t be offended by that, I think this is pretty good
Weird. That has never happened to me. Mention it in the forums if you haven’t already. And thanks! It was designed for jumps @Maximum777
brilliant!
Get rid of the suspension blockers and just make the springs stiffer. Blockers trigger me
Needs real suspension or just default wheel suspension. Wheels on a shock is simply not robust or functional enough. Have a look at different suspension types and try to recreate it
I doubt I’ll ever use it but I appreciate having the option
Yes, you got it @atgxtg
That is a scared looking fox
discord server link @MrSilverWolf @Caveman999 @Mostly
discord server link @BaconEggs
Or that @stig27
Don’t worry about it. I’ll just start handing out instant invites to take some load off your shoulders @mikoyanster
Please do! Fill out the “join us” form on the website (link is up above) and @mikoyanster should handle it. If it takes too long, I’ll send you an instant invite to the discord group @Caveman999
bUt iTs A hIsToRiCaL bUiLd @Blue0Bull
I’m glad you think so! Feel free to join so you can have your screenshots up here in the next promotional post @F104Deathtrap
Simple planes has horrific stall simulations and no propwash simulation at all so 3D planes aren’t possible using traditional building methods. Workarounds are possible with gyros, RCS, etc but it won’t be like the real thing
Since the day I bought a 3D RC plane.
.
.
.
Just kidding, it’s really hard at first but easy once you get you flying hours up
I@F104Deathtrap
Oh yeah, I forgot lol. It will probably be some sort of SAM assault but I have no idea of the time @ThePilotDude
Anyone can join as long as you are interested in aviation and won’t cause a ruckus. I have no idea when the next meeting will be but we do have a basic plan of what it will be. If you want to join, complete the form on the website (I think I linked it up above) and you’ll soon get invited to the discord @ThePilotDude
Modded detachers get you to the highest number that unity supports but you can't really land it
blurple, yellow and baby-poo brown
@Hyattorama thank you very much!
Did you change anything from the original?
@Dllama4 no idea what you mean by that. Is that a positive 'oof' or negative 'oof'?
@jamesPLANESii Added it now. Thanks for pointing that out!
@Caveman999 Thank you!
Thanks, but I’ve already established that as you can see in the edited section and the comments below @laserborn88
All aggressive entities cease fire when you are "critically damaged" so you don’t have missiles continually hitting your separated cockpit. It also means you can watch your aircraft fall from the sky in a fiery blaze instead of being bombarded by machine gun fire until there is nothing left. It also means ejecting a pylon breaks the whole system @stig27
The touchscreen is a bit insensitive but appears to be crack-proof
√-1/10
May or may not buy again
Around 1000 is what I use to simulate a 30-40mm gun. That creates explosions aplenty
@jamesPLANESii figured it out. Edited the post to explain
@jamesPLANESii Yes. I initiated hostilities and they started attacking, I jettisoned weapons and they stopped. I even blew the carrier and one destroyer with guns and the other destroyer didn't care. If I don't jettison bombs and missiles, they continue attacking
If you have overload or an XML editor, you’ll be able to find a control surface deflection value. As for fine tuning size, I’ve never had much success. @atgxtg
Came up with that on the spot lol @Zyvx
I hope it will have real suspension
Probably a system of a pendulum attached to control wires. Just make sure the weight of the pendulum can overcome the flight forces on control surfaces @ThePrototype
Sure, go ahead @Captbadass