@Kangy i do use war thunder for roll and pitch for reference.
.
The trouble for me is the artificial Weight and drag. But i guess ill keep tinkering on it for the variant with cockpit intruments.
@Kangy the "guesses" part was meant for the roll and turn rate., As for the acceleration part. Its either/both the game's weird drag system or/and how the aircraft is 800kg or more, lighter.
.
The engine's horsepower even is already up to the historical one (1990hp), and i believe maoing the aircraft heavier will just make it feel less manuverable. Messing with its current weight also messes up its trim stability pretty badly, it wont fly at level at all.
@Kangy i only had my guesses as to how it should perform like, it being japanese made me think it should have great turn rate and roll rate. I also heard that the Hayate is fast and agile. Although, it does turn way too well, so i could update the XML file.
@JustDragon i doubt ill be the first too, the big guys(platinum users) have yet to come in, and im sure theyre taking their sweet time on building their replicas.
@Cereal i use mobile (a somewhat powerful one now) and i know how suffering its like for mobile users. You could say it was a blessing that i didnt do the USN insignia on this build lol
Not sure what my next plan is, the P47D Thunderbolt or the Baulton Paul Defiant with the Auto-Aim and Camera-Aim featuee. The latter sounds interesting as it has like 270° turning arc for the turret. And it isnt that popular.
@Alisuchanka looking at how you can switch modes for the tail gunner makes me feel building the Boulton Paul Defiant on my own is going to be even more difficult than i thought.
@Galland aight, ill just do it wuth a blueprint then and adjust the existing details (gunpods, landing gears) to match up the one in the blueprint ill be using.
@1114117483 i am reminded of how my older model phone decided to boot loop itself, abd made me lost quite a bit of progress of my Supermarine Spiteful over half a year ago.
@ThomasRoderick basicly made a spawn location near USS Tiny Two fleet, then repawned there with the quadcopter and land it on USS Tiny Two flight deck, before making another spawn location.
Hmm, i think i just have the right prototype aircraft i have for this challenge. Its still being built, but lets say its inspired from the P-39 Airocobra
@Blaize1380 youll get used to it when you study the wings hard, i was the same as you back then. And with this new possibility of making a ming, i'll study it so it can be my in my new builds.
Somehow, i cant help but feel that it has the same "over roll" issue my La-7 had. But forget that. This is a very nice build that it reminds me of mine lol. Too bad my phone isnt powerful enough to make a proper dogfight with my La-7 and your La-5FN.
This actually looks promising in the case of the Pzkpfw IV's chassis. Something tells me if the design like WoT's Pzkpfw III/IV concluded, this would have been its further development. Though the one thing that concerns me is will the Suspension withstand its weight since its the problem the original Pzkpfw IV had that made its Schmalturm planned variant get diminished.
Whew nice, especially that space for the landing gear on the wings. I could learn a thing or more from it for my future builds.
+1@Grob0s0VBRa by mean "fuselage with circular corners", did you meant the wingtips?
+1@Vincent could you make this a successor to this post?
+1Definitely not something i can compete in considering im bad at making cockpit intruments, and flight performances being 100+kph faster on sea level.
+1@Kangy i do use war thunder for roll and pitch for reference.
+1.
The trouble for me is the artificial Weight and drag. But i guess ill keep tinkering on it for the variant with cockpit intruments.
@Kangy the "guesses" part was meant for the roll and turn rate., As for the acceleration part. Its either/both the game's weird drag system or/and how the aircraft is 800kg or more, lighter.
+1.
The engine's horsepower even is already up to the historical one (1990hp), and i believe maoing the aircraft heavier will just make it feel less manuverable. Messing with its current weight also messes up its trim stability pretty badly, it wont fly at level at all.
Bringd me nostalgia of when i first started SP and this is the plane i first built lol
+1@Farewellntchii i updated the XML file of the plane, i nerfed its turn rate so you might have to redownload it for the "combat" test
+1@Kangy i only had my guesses as to how it should perform like, it being japanese made me think it should have great turn rate and roll rate. I also heard that the Hayate is fast and agile. Although, it does turn way too well, so i could update the XML file.
+1@JustDragon i doubt ill be the first too, the big guys(platinum users) have yet to come in, and im sure theyre taking their sweet time on building their replicas.
+1@IceCraftGaming some really amazing ones get featured sometimes. Its just replicas are more manageable to build.
+1From "game within a game" to "an app within a game". This truely is the definition of "Simpleplanes".
+1@beenz Give me the blueprint you used on thid aircraft and i might rebuild its wings for you.
+1@ollielebananiaCFSP nah, just let it be.
+1@Lake theres none, i made it on my own, albeit at a not so detailed manner. But this one should be a better option.
+1@Cereal i use mobile (a somewhat powerful one now) and i know how suffering its like for mobile users. You could say it was a blessing that i didnt do the USN insignia on this build lol
+1@Lake This?
+1Not sure what my next plan is, the P47D Thunderbolt or the Baulton Paul Defiant with the Auto-Aim and Camera-Aim featuee. The latter sounds interesting as it has like 270° turning arc for the turret. And it isnt that popular.
+1@Alisuchanka looking at how you can switch modes for the tail gunner makes me feel building the Boulton Paul Defiant on my own is going to be even more difficult than i thought.
+1Hope your builds in the future become as good and simple as mine :D
+1@teddyone02 loud turboprop noises
+1@TheDesignate i think you should add another rule where existing builds doesnt count (Otherwise ill submit my F4U-4B on this) lol.
+1You really had to crack a joke in there huh? Lol
+1@Galland aight, ill just do it wuth a blueprint then and adjust the existing details (gunpods, landing gears) to match up the one in the blueprint ill be using.
+1@Galland alright, though id like it if you provide me the blueprint you used to perfectly match the "dimensions" of this original post.
+1@PilotBug oh that. Sadly no, but you can assisn one as a spawn location though.
+1Hey @galland, want me to rebuild the wings of this thing like the ones in my Fw190A8 and so?
+1@1114117483 i am reminded of how my older model phone decided to boot loop itself, abd made me lost quite a bit of progress of my Supermarine Spiteful over half a year ago.
+1@BogdanX ill try it in my upcoming Wyvern S.4 build
+1@ThomasRoderick basicly made a spawn location near USS Tiny Two fleet, then repawned there with the quadcopter and land it on USS Tiny Two flight deck, before making another spawn location.
+1@LarryTad heres the build btw, your turn on making its internal beautiful :)
+1@Vincent can you kindly modify the successor to @Walvis remaster challenge pls? Thanks.
+1Hmm, i think i just have the right prototype aircraft i have for this challenge. Its still being built, but lets say its inspired from the P-39 Airocobra
+1My god i never noticed that!! Andrew Garrison already pointed it out to me and i never knew about it until just now.
+1@parkrangerjerry now we need german Mustang, german hellcat, german Thunderbolt and german lightning! XD
+1@Leahh theres a pinned thread by the forums.
+1@Amirabadi yes. I just looked for one thats high quality enough.
+1@Amirabadi i used this first for the initial building, then used this for the paint scheme afterwards. :)
+1@JamezTV maybe someday, then again i have no plans on what to build next.
+1]
Edit: good news
@Blaize1380 youll get used to it when you study the wings hard, i was the same as you back then. And with this new possibility of making a ming, i'll study it so it can be my in my new builds.
+1Remember what Kevin said? yeh this will be a huge change to everyone's builds in the future.
+1@TatsuTheOtaku i used this blueprint and... Well it is only a couple millimeters short.
+1Devs pls, i think you forgot the Yaw Pedals xD how are SP VR players going to Yaw.
+1@ReinMcDeer heres a Sneak Peak of the convertion
+1@ThomasRoderick something to do with the armaments i guess? Theres no real specification.
+1@ReindMcDeer actually... I think ill go modify it into an F2G-2 lol
+1@ReinMcDeer aight, ill start once i get the new more powerful phone im having next week.
+1@PapaKernels worry not, im in the works of making another one, though its fictional but it looks cool.
+1Somehow, i cant help but feel that it has the same "over roll" issue my La-7 had. But forget that. This is a very nice build that it reminds me of mine lol. Too bad my phone isnt powerful enough to make a proper dogfight with my La-7 and your La-5FN.
+1This actually looks promising in the case of the Pzkpfw IV's chassis. Something tells me if the design like WoT's Pzkpfw III/IV concluded, this would have been its further development. Though the one thing that concerns me is will the Suspension withstand its weight since its the problem the original Pzkpfw IV had that made its Schmalturm planned variant get diminished.
+1