18.0k Kangy Comments

  • Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II 5.7 years ago

    @Diloph Lol it's ok it happens to the best of us

    +1
  • SB 190 A-1 "Fliegende Schlange" 5.8 years ago

    @SovietBun I thancc u for this beautiful build!

    +1
  • SB 190 A-1 "Fliegende Schlange" 5.8 years ago

    Ĥällœ çœmræðë pëñĝùìñ

    +1
  • CAC CA-31 Blueprints finished 5.8 years ago

    Well it sorta is a bit small for a plane.
    Here's what it looked like in mock up
    @randomusername

    +1
  • Grumman F11F-1 Tiger 5.8 years ago

    @EngineerOtaku Very nice! Thanks so much for the explanation. I love getting an insight of how builders approach their work.

    +1
  • Grumman F11F-1 Tiger 5.8 years ago

    Good build! Well done on the cockpit. Very hard to keep under 400 parts with a custom cockpit.

    +1
  • New Build! The CAC CA-31 'Sparrowhawk' 5.8 years ago

    Though I think one was actually built, there is no footage of this aircraft being real. There are some blueprints of this aircraft and it is mentioned on Wikipedia however it is found on a website and I think it is in a museum in Moorabbin, Australia.
    Clicky for some info @edensk

    +1
  • Scout Takahe 5.8 years ago

    @Chenxiang not cool

    +1
  • Cessna 172S Skyhawk 5.8 years ago

    Why did i know that Bacon would try to rick roll all the peasants? I have a somewhat good iPad able to run 1000+ parts but this ran fine on my pc, Top Notch Stuffz

    +1
  • Help with a WW2 style plane build 5.8 years ago

    Ty very much, I'll use that, do you want me to tag you when the plane is out? @edensk

    +1
  • F-202 Fantail 5.8 years ago

    Yeah it's all g, honestly I find non tvc aircraft a bit more fun not fly, some tvc aircraft on SP are too uncontrollable. @Thorne

    +1
  • F-202 Fantail 5.9 years ago

    I'm Strayan' and let me tell you this is amazing, I would replace the F-35A with this. Only one problem, I think Australia needs something with thrust vectoring to turn quicker. Not criticising you btw it's a suggestion. Good job on this aircraft though

    +1
  • SP and SR2 6.0 years ago

    Thank you guys so much! I had no idea this was important to everyone. I do find iOS building on SP hard to do so I just wondered if SR2 is better. Do u guys reckon another update 4 sp will come out? @DPSAircraftManufacturer @randomusername @TUNDERTEAM @CruzerBlade @Awsomur

    +1
  • Naval Attack Challenge 6.0 years ago

    I am too... I’m working on a build which could be modified to suite some terms... @Thelegitpilot13

    +1
  • XT-F06 Astaroth Prototype 6.0 years ago

    Oh cwap I’m sawy @Sadboye12

    +1
  • XT-F06 Astaroth Prototype 6.0 years ago

    One of the Mods has seen your work and likes it. I think, I’ve never had featured stuff so... distant depression @Sadboye12

    +1
  • ME-163 IS PROP PLANE CONFIRMED 6.0 years ago

    He’s speaking the language of the gods! @Aarons123

    +1
  • Crossfire Hurricane 6.0 years ago

    Welp, first comment I guess. Great plane, good job on the build and description!

    +1
  • Martin Scout™ II 6.1 years ago

    “Mmm that’s gr8 m8 I r8 8 out of 8”

    +1
  • EDGE 540 V3 6.1 years ago

    Ahh k. I’m an iOS user so that was super helpful. Ty for that. @Agrelle

    +1
  • BAE Hawk 127 6.1 years ago

    Actually I did some research and we rented some whilst the USAF were testing new aircraft. Here is some info: clicky@Pilotmario

    +1
  • AoA overiding system version Wasp 6.1 years ago

    I’m releasing my aircraft based on the F-111 Aardvark soon too. @Thelegitpilot13

    +1
  • AoA overiding system version Wasp 6.1 years ago

    Ah k ty
    Just saying I’m going to attempt to make a plane a bit like this one but more stable @Thelegitpilot13

    +1
  • Biplane Challenge! [30 upvote prize] 6.2 years ago

    Ima give it a shot

    +1
  • Saab AJ 37 Viggen 6.2 years ago

    Lol I know I used it after I did that comment as usually I don’t use trim. I enjoy doing aerobatics. Ooo would I be able to try do testing at some point? I’ve done it 1 time before, so I sort of know how it works@Thelegitpilot13

    +1
  • Saab AJ 37 Viggen 6.2 years ago

    Me: Tries to not use trim
    Me 20 seconds later: THATS A LOT OF DAMAGE!@Thelegitpilot13

    +1
  • AGT supercar 6.2 years ago

    James.....

    I agree
    @jamesPLANESii

    +1
  • B-29 Super Fortress with 2 Pumpkin Bombs 6.2 years ago

    Very true. At Avalon airshow some of the classic planes had flat paint where as wartime replicas had gloss paint. However if the plane’s pilots wanted the aircraft to look battle ready then the paint would be flat.
    @BogdanX

    +1
  • [WEBW]Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor 6.2 years ago

    Me: Tries to load this on my iPad 4.
    My iPad: aww ** here we go again.
    @TakeYourLife3000

    +1
  • F/A-87 Filibuster 6.3 years ago

    This is such a sick design, I love anything with thrust vectoring, so may I suggest a sukhoi Su series? Maybe a Su 30sm or su 57? I shouldn’t really say much as I have like no experience in building, if u check my aircraft they are... crap.@Leehopard

    +1
  • Blenheim Mk.1F 6.3 years ago

    Straya also operated them for the RAF during the battle of the Mediterranean. Also the only bomber that I actually used as an interceptor in war thunder. lol

    +1
  • CAC - CA-23 Taipan 2 months ago

    Roundel should face the front of the airplane, nice build though

  • Small Plane I Made 6 months ago

    THE guh plane

  • Audi TT 3.2L '03 (v1.1) 7 months ago

    @rexzion no shot I’m looking at getting one later this year :)

  • [PEA] CAC Wirraway 8 months ago

    @KPLBall wrong way around the BT was produced after the Texan. They’re also completely unrelated designs the only commonality they have being their year of first flight. Note that the BT is a Northrop product, the NA-16 / T-6 being a North American Aviation product.
    Wirraway was based on the NA-16 and only the NA-16. Can’t see how you think it’s related to the SBD or BT

  • [PEA] CAC Wirraway 8 months ago

    what am i looking at
    wirraway has nothing to do with the dauntless btw they're completely different designs

  • SPVR Challenge 9 months ago

    Challenge closed. I will be reviewing builds and getting results out soon hopefully.

  • Entry1, Phantom 10 months ago

    @Axartar I contacted deezducks, he’s a helpful fella

  • Entry1, Phantom 10 months ago

    @Axartar it needs successorship to be in the challenge - you can change the build's xml file to suit or get one of the mods to help

  • My Build 10 months ago

    this video is literally like that one place in China where in 1989 nothing happened!!!!!

  • What I'm scared about SP2 10 months ago

    @SPsidearm yep
    it’s far better that way anyway it means that the devs can make it for the pc first and foremost and then scale it back for mobile devices

  • What I'm scared about SP2 10 months ago

    @SPsidearm key word ‘launching’
    sp2 is launching on pc only in 2025™️

  • What I'm scared about SP2 10 months ago

    sp2 isn’t launching on mobile lol

  • The Legg 10 months ago

    this is like that one teen titans go episode

  • Trophy truck by MVC 10 months ago

    are you using control bases? you can make them bottom out so that you won’t have chance of the chassis’ floor hitting the ground unless you high centre the car for whatever reason

  • something happened to L1nus's account 11 months ago

    @Duwbie hi linud

  • Nice Catch! Nice Catch! NiceCatch! 11 months ago

    free thinkers when theres RAIN!!!!!!!!!!!

  • RJ Wollongong B1 6.6 11 months ago

    @RamboJutter haha nice I like it

  • RJ Wollongong B1 6.6 11 months ago

    you in Australia or something?? your recent design names are awfully familiar to Aussie thingies