@TheMouse Compared to the experimental version, the final version adopts three suggestions from you and @TheUltimatePlaneLover
-Two of the flames on the left wing are detached, make sure to reconnect those
-Perhaps add an orbit camera in the center of the aircraft to have a more stable orbit view
And replace faulty weapons
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Well bro, I'm facing a Huge Trouble I find it difficult to test the new version of T-3 because it has a total of 827 parts. I need someone to help me with the testing. I originally intended to use an opportunity to participate in the competition and have the organizer help me test it, but I realized that there are still many works that have not been rated, which means the organizer may not have time. So I hope you can help me test this plane.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Me? Fine, although my entry T-3 did indeed modify someone else's plane, the completion level of that plane was very low, and I made a lot of changes. To be honest, the completion level of the A40C is already very high, and I can't think of any further improvement. The maneuverability and appearance are excellent, and if we really need to make modifications, we can only remake the drone and install intelligent weapons. Moreover, it is unknown whether the second version of T-3 can be released before the deadline, so I apologize that I cannot do so
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, your aircraft is excellent in terms of weapons and maneuverability. While Mobius stands out in appearance, there are significant deficiencies in its maneuverability. Unless special means (Like AOA) are used, it will lose a lot of points as a result. This is our only opportunity. Mobius's design goes beyond traditional concepts, and adding weapons would be troublesome and difficult to achieve as yours. The only problem is that we are not sure what weapons Mobius will be equipped with, after all, there was a work that only used two small nuclear bombs and received 7 points for "weapons", which is the same score as me (I still remember it to this day)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
@TheMouse Okay, it seems that the score for automatic ejection is already included in the extra. Let me think, I can't make further improvements to the plane, so I can't improve my look score. Other... what kind of weapon can get 9… Try my best.
@TheMouse Due to changes in the situation, besides machine guns and nuclear bombs, I have decided to manufacture a third major weapon. I hope they can get me 39.
By the way, can the automatic ejection system earn extra points?
@TheMouse I have seen that UFO and it is very good, even making me wonder if I should remake a plane. In fact, the author of A40 thinks so. But unfortunately, I really don't have time to improve the T-3 body again. It's already very good, and I can only make improvements to the weapon. I can't even be sure if the high parts weapons I make will satisfy you.
@TheMouse Oh! I am glad to hear this news. In fact, I found that the rotary machine gun I made has a risk of jamming due to its high firing rate, which greatly limits its performance.
@TheMouse em… In fact, I replaced the weapons I used and replaced the cluster bombs with a nuclear bomb. But in order to earn an extra point in the extra, I decided to create an interesting design.
@TheMouse ... I thought cluster bomb would be enough for OP. Okay, I will upload another version. I need to make a special machine gun (although it still doesn't meet the requirements)
@Majakalona em…Sorry," it may sometimes "rubber band" manuever thing"I dont understand what do you mean. Is it severe shaking, stalling, or something else?
I only know that this aircraft will stall at speeds above 1500 kilometers per hour, and this issue has been fixed
@Mousewithamachinegun122 Can I separate the weapons so that you can reinstall them yourself during testing to avoid the issue of the 700 parts upper limit?
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
@JuliusCeasor98 ... em... Okay, I won't release the revision. In fact, I have already completed the super modification of this aircraft, but it lacks the permission of the original author. I will keep it as a technical reserve for myself.
If you encounter difficulties in making fighter jets in the future, I may be able to help you.
Oh, there's one more thing. I am also writing my own "lore"
By the way, the prerequisite for China's willingness to export the J-20 fighter jet is that more advanced fighter jets have been put into service on a large scale, and it will take at least another 50 years. Betraying in this situation will not cause any losses to China, it will only result in you losing one life-saving card.
The prototype is good, but the maneuverability of this fighter jet is very poor. It should be because the aircraft is too small, which prevents the wing area from increasing and results in a larger wing load. But the 300 wing load is not very severe, I suggest you replace the full motion canards to improve performance.
How could it be you again. Let me see... why is the center of gravity and lift center of gravity so far apart? Big sweep wings? Small horizontal tail and control surface? Such a large wing load! It's hopeless, why not build a new one.
@GuardianAerospace Bro, I suddenly discovered a problem. Why do we have to argue? The meaning of what I said is "Although the MiG-29 fighter jet is very poor, comparing it to this plane is insulting MiG-29." Do you understand it as something else?
@GuardianAerospace 20 to 30 years in advance, this statement is very correct during the Gulf War. In 2024, I think you may not have woken up. Where did you see this history class again?
@GuardianAerospace You should get rid of simply comparing weapons and equipment to judge the direction of war. This is not a numerical game, otherwise the US military wouldn't have to withdraw from Afghanistan.
@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Okay, bro, I'm glad to hear from you. I have posted a teaser and I would like to wait until one day after I finish writing the manuscript before it can be officially released
@TheMouse Compared to the experimental version, the final version adopts three suggestions from you and @TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1-Two of the flames on the left wing are detached, make sure to reconnect those
-Perhaps add an orbit camera in the center of the aircraft to have a more stable orbit view
And replace faulty weapons
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Well bro, I'm facing a Huge Trouble I find it difficult to test the new version of T-3 because it has a total of 827 parts. I need someone to help me with the testing. I originally intended to use an opportunity to participate in the competition and have the organizer help me test it, but I realized that there are still many works that have not been rated, which means the organizer may not have time. So I hope you can help me test this plane.
+1Previously: Will the limit of 1000 parts be too high?
+1After calculation: How can I compress it to a thousand parts and still run normally
So busy... If I upload my work on May 9th and don't receive a rating on May 10th, will I lose eligibility?
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Congratulations, bro! It's almost impossible for anyone to get 10, the first place is already in your bag.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thank you for your trust, bro. But the more crucial issue is that I don't have time
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Me? Fine, although my entry T-3 did indeed modify someone else's plane, the completion level of that plane was very low, and I made a lot of changes. To be honest, the completion level of the A40C is already very high, and I can't think of any further improvement. The maneuverability and appearance are excellent, and if we really need to make modifications, we can only remake the drone and install intelligent weapons. Moreover, it is unknown whether the second version of T-3 can be released before the deadline, so I apologize that I cannot do so
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, your aircraft is excellent in terms of weapons and maneuverability. While Mobius stands out in appearance, there are significant deficiencies in its maneuverability. Unless special means (Like AOA) are used, it will lose a lot of points as a result. This is our only opportunity. Mobius's design goes beyond traditional concepts, and adding weapons would be troublesome and difficult to achieve as yours. The only problem is that we are not sure what weapons Mobius will be equipped with, after all, there was a work that only used two small nuclear bombs and received 7 points for "weapons", which is the same score as me (I still remember it to this day)
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
+1I am looking forward to the final score of this aircraft and hope it can reach 41
+1I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
+1@TheMouse Okay, it seems that the score for automatic ejection is already included in the extra. Let me think, I can't make further improvements to the plane, so I can't improve my look score. Other... what kind of weapon can get 9… Try my best.
+1@TheMouse Due to changes in the situation, besides machine guns and nuclear bombs, I have decided to manufacture a third major weapon. I hope they can get me 39.
+1By the way, can the automatic ejection system earn extra points?
@TheMouse I have seen that UFO and it is very good, even making me wonder if I should remake a plane. In fact, the author of A40 thinks so. But unfortunately, I really don't have time to improve the T-3 body again. It's already very good, and I can only make improvements to the weapon. I can't even be sure if the high parts weapons I make will satisfy you.
+1@TheMouse Oh! I am glad to hear this news. In fact, I found that the rotary machine gun I made has a risk of jamming due to its high firing rate, which greatly limits its performance.
+1@TheMouse em… In fact, I replaced the weapons I used and replaced the cluster bombs with a nuclear bomb. But in order to earn an extra point in the extra, I decided to create an interesting design.
+1@TheMouse I have another question. Can you explain in more detail how to determine OP weapons?
+1@TheMouse ... I thought cluster bomb would be enough for OP. Okay, I will upload another version. I need to make a special machine gun (although it still doesn't meet the requirements)
+1@Majakalona Okay, it seems that the problem is easier than I imagined. Thank you for your help
+1@Majakalona …god. Always or any under special circumstances?
+1@Majakalona em…Sorry," it may sometimes "rubber band" manuever thing"I dont understand what do you mean. Is it severe shaking, stalling, or something else?
+1I only know that this aircraft will stall at speeds above 1500 kilometers per hour, and this issue has been fixed
@Majakalona Thanks man, I really need your help.
+1@GabrielSatori Welcome back. I can't wait to read carefully, but unfortunately, I'm already going to bed. I will check again tomorrow morning
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Ok…I think the final product may only have 500 more parts
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Can I separate the weapons so that you can reinstall them yourself during testing to avoid the issue of the 700 parts upper limit?
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 OK thanks
+1em…What does overpowered mean? Simply more powerful weapons and maneuverability?
+1@IQinventory Sorry, I'm referring to the Air Force emblem. In my impression, it is composed of red and yellow
+1A completely symmetrical cockpit…
+1@OPTICJATT Now only you know
+1The fact once again proves that the purpose of Simpleplanes is beyond my understanding
+1事实再一次刷新了我对简单飞机用途的认识
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
+1@JuliusCeasor98 ... em... Okay, I won't release the revision. In fact, I have already completed the super modification of this aircraft, but it lacks the permission of the original author. I will keep it as a technical reserve for myself.
+1If you encounter difficulties in making fighter jets in the future, I may be able to help you.
Oh, there's one more thing. I am also writing my own "lore"
By the way, the prerequisite for China's willingness to export the J-20 fighter jet is that more advanced fighter jets have been put into service on a large scale, and it will take at least another 50 years. Betraying in this situation will not cause any losses to China, it will only result in you losing one life-saving card.
+1The prototype is good, but the maneuverability of this fighter jet is very poor. It should be because the aircraft is too small, which prevents the wing area from increasing and results in a larger wing load. But the 300 wing load is not very severe, I suggest you replace the full motion canards to improve performance.
+1很有勇气的简介，爱来自爸爸美国
+1Did you really test fly this plane yourself?
+1I don't think this plane can get enough power to fly
这啥飞机？
+1How could it be you again. Let me see... why is the center of gravity and lift center of gravity so far apart? Big sweep wings? Small horizontal tail and control surface? Such a large wing load! It's hopeless, why not build a new one.
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Thanks bro. I'm not good at making details, so I hardly ever make real airplanes because they can easily deviate too much.
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Thanks bro
+1@GuardianAerospace Bro, I suddenly discovered a problem. Why do we have to argue? The meaning of what I said is "Although the MiG-29 fighter jet is very poor, comparing it to this plane is insulting MiG-29." Do you understand it as something else?
+1@GuardianAerospace 20 to 30 years in advance, this statement is very correct during the Gulf War. In 2024, I think you may not have woken up. Where did you see this history class again?
+1@GuardianAerospace I don't think so. In 2016, China didn't lose in the South China Sea electronic warfare
+1@GuardianAerospace You should get rid of simply comparing weapons and equipment to judge the direction of war. This is not a numerical game, otherwise the US military wouldn't have to withdraw from Afghanistan.
+1@GuardianAerospace How could Russia possibly have the Soviet military system? You're not joking, are you?
+1@GuardianAerospace …Did you learn about it through playing games? When can war be discussed outside of the military system?
+1改完后飞起来也是一抖一抖的…我给你改一下吧，改完直接发官网
+1哥们，你这J10好怪呀，主翼pitch是不是反了
+1@Justanormalindonesianguy2 Okay, bro, I'm glad to hear from you. I have posted a teaser and I would like to wait until one day after I finish writing the manuscript before it can be officially released
+1