@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
It uses the most basic coordinate aiming method, and the latest version uses the proportional guidance method.
(You received it again because I accidentally deleted the previous one)
@DeeganWithABazooka No, the missile is an FT missile, and the starting method is not very important. The reason why shells can be used to start is that I have tied the starting method to the number of shells.
By the way, this is my earliest FT missile, far inferior to current technology
@KPLBall If this is your universe, then of course I have no objections.
But! You must mark it at the beginning!
This is not a warning, but because I am familiar with you, I am able to restrain myself. Let other Chinese people see, that is direct blasting.
Who can withstand splitting someone else's country in half?
This is a mass-produced subsonic missile, so it can be intercepted.
FT is not a symbol of OP, it is just a means of diversifying weapons. But the OP caused by the all-round impact brought by diversified weapons is another matter.
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@RepublicofWrightIsles Is it on the Isle of Wight? If yes, I blew it up
@RepublicofWrightIsles About your ship: Go to the bottom of the sea to catch it yourself
@RepublicofWrightIsles That's not up to you. Since you're not prepared, I declare this attack invalid.
@RepublicofWrightIsles Have you seen the anti-aircraft missile I sent you?
hm?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover watching…
?
@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
It uses the most basic coordinate aiming method, and the latest version uses the proportional guidance method.
(You received it again because I accidentally deleted the previous one)
@DeeganWithABazooka Of course, it's a backward product anyway.
@DeeganWithABazooka No, the missile is an FT missile, and the starting method is not very important. The reason why shells can be used to start is that I have tied the starting method to the number of shells.
By the way, this is my earliest FT missile, far inferior to current technology
@UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA "" I think I should launch a massive airstrike and attacks using some AC-130 we bought from the U.S in 1998.
Ya know what, no imma take that back"
It doesn't feel very realistic
@DeeganWithABazooka ? pardon?
@DeeganWithABazooka Wow, indeed.
Sorry, this is an older taglist
@DeeganWithABazooka It should have been shelled by RB107 ships last month and repaired two days later
@KPLBall If this is your universe, then of course I have no objections.
But! You must mark it at the beginning!
This is not a warning, but because I am familiar with you, I am able to restrain myself. Let other Chinese people see, that is direct blasting.
Who can withstand splitting someone else's country in half?
You were supposed to focus on the Congo Civil War Challenge properly. Why did you have to insert your personal agenda here? Are you out of yourmind?
@KPLBall What timeline are you on? Did you invent history?
If you don't provide a clear explanation, I will report you for involvement in politics
West China
East China
你想干嘛？
tell me why
@KPLBall fine bro, I wont tag you next time
@KPLBall so… Have you withdrawn from the war?
This is a mass-produced subsonic missile, so it can be intercepted.
FT is not a symbol of OP, it is just a means of diversifying weapons. But the OP caused by the all-round impact brought by diversified weapons is another matter.
@RB107 (RRHI - Loyalist)
-@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore (Loyalist)
@NominalSituation (Sorbet Onion - Loyalist)
@NerfAddict (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Boeing727200F (MDA - Loyalist)
-@SuperSuperTheSylph (Diable Defense - Loyalist)
@Dracul0Anderson (Skypark - Loyalist?)
-@SPSidearm (DoF Leader - Loyalist?)
-@MonsNotTheMonster (Pearlian Republic - Loyalist)
@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@UnitedinOne90 (Loyalist)
@windshifter1 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Karroc9522 (MDA - Loyalist)
@DeeganWithABazooka (Deegan - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@CrestelAeronautics (MDA - Loyalist)
-@TheUltimatePlaneLover (- MDA - Loyalist)
-@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 (MDA - Loyalist)
@Zero0Two2
@BlackGearCompany
@Graingy … Let's forget about it. With this time, my stealth carrier based aircraft have been mass-produced
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD, no time limit
@Graingy Okay, then I won't force you. Cancel time limit, no rush
@Graingy How much are you raising the price? If it's too much, I'll just use my own
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD
@Graingy I need 12 planes, the faster the better. Can you give me a price.
@Graingy Do you have a shipboard aircraft? Delivery within two days, you can set the price
@RestlessGalaxies …?
I don't think most people would think of the one you mentioned…
@RestlessGalaxies Um... It makes sense, anyway, limiting G-force only requires adding a correction code to the vector engine
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
must VTOL?
@Lake so bad
@Someonefun yeah I saw it.
To be honest, I am honored to receive such an evaluation. I hope you can continue to work hard in the future
@Lake surely no
I am sorry to hear that
@Subsere Can you let me see it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover surely…
@SPsidearm surely
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ? wdym