@Planebuilder2122 Well, since there's several variables involved it would probably just be easiest to use this thing I just made that's just the radar with all of the variables you need :)
Not how it works. The problem isn't that Jundroo doesn't want to run code on Android/iOS, it's that Apple/Google don't allow third-party code like SP mods to be run on their devices.
@TheSeventh By pitch I was referring to the pitch of the entire aircraft (nose up/down), not the pitch of the blades. The tail rotor doesn't control the elevation of the nose.
Try telling her how you're feeling, and how her actions are making you feel. Don't immediately confront her with "what you're doing is wrong", instead try and tell her about how her actions have affected you.
If she's not willing to have that talk... well, then you to end the relationship right there. It sucks, but if she isn't willing to care about and take steps to fix the effects her actions are having on you, then that's not a relationship anymore, and it's time to let go of her regardless of how she might react. Giving her time won't help anything if she isn't willing to listen to you in the first place. It's a hard decision to make (especially if she reacts emotionally to it), but you've got to do it.
Keep in mind that you are not at fault in this situation, so don't let her blame you for anything (as she probably will). You've done nothing wrong here.
Most importantly, don't give up on yourself. Your life is worth more than this. Stay strong, brother.
Bypassing the auto credit system is a direct violation of the site rules.
If you are circumventing the predecessor/successor system, then you will be banned. Never upload a successor as an original design; give credit to the designer of its predecessor.
Regardless of how much time and effort you put into modifying a build, in the end it still started as someone else's build, and you must credit them for that. Additionally, I find the claim that "AUTO CREDIT BRINGS DOWN UPVOTES WHEN YOU SHARE" to be, quite frankly, laughable. People don't choose to upvote something based on whether it is modified from someone else's build or not. People upvote stuff they like, and stuff they think is good.
@Dragoranos Hmm.... not quite what I was thinking with this challenge but technically if the wings can pivot in-game it should be all good. Sounds interesting!
Not to mention the fact that she actually still flies pretty dang well once you get the gear up. Nothing ridiculous or anything, but more than you would expect. Sure, takeoffs can be tricky (I mean, the original creator even posted an updated version to "fix" the flying), and using the flaps just forces you into a dive, but with a careful hand at the controls, she still flies just fine.
@JesusChrist It's the 7.1 years ago part. AKA September 2015, AKA four months before the game was even released on Steam.
In its day, this was quite literally the single best plane anyone had ever built. It had working landing gear, a working cockpit, working (single-shot) guns, and roundels, all long before the advent of hinge/small rotators, fuselage blocks, gauges, actual weapons, and FineTuner. This plane was legendary, and it was the best thing that those of us who were players at the time had ever seen.
💀
+2That guy has so much good stuff.
His editing skills are unbelievable too.
+2<span style="color: var(- - level of information body-text);">
+1That P-40 looks awesome! I'd be glad to help test it if you want.
@Planebuilder2122 Well, since there's several variables involved it would probably just be easiest to use this thing I just made that's just the radar with all of the variables you need :)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Sf2sqX/Variable-Range-Radar
+1@Planebuilder2122 Sure, go ahead! I'd appreciate credit though.
+1Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts. Also, this entry doesn't seem to be a completed build?
+1MiG-17
+1Not how it works. The problem isn't that Jundroo doesn't want to run code on Android/iOS, it's that Apple/Google don't allow third-party code like SP mods to be run on their devices.
+7@Mondayhater All entries will be rated/judged once the challenge deadline has arrived.
@beenz Aw yeah
+3@TheSeventh By pitch I was referring to the pitch of the entire aircraft (nose up/down), not the pitch of the blades. The tail rotor doesn't control the elevation of the nose.
Increase suspension damper and/or decrease spring strength.
Increase suspension damper and/or decrease spring strength.
+1@JustDragon yay
+1Already possible using either hinge rotators or just not
Wing-2wings.The tail rotor (even on real helicopters) doesn't have any control over pitch, so I'm not sure why you're wanting this.
+1As a former mobile-player myself, absolutely would recommend upgrading to the PC version.
+1No, not (currently) possible.
+1Try telling her how you're feeling, and how her actions are making you feel. Don't immediately confront her with "what you're doing is wrong", instead try and tell her about how her actions have affected you.
If she's not willing to have that talk... well, then you to end the relationship right there. It sucks, but if she isn't willing to care about and take steps to fix the effects her actions are having on you, then that's not a relationship anymore, and it's time to let go of her regardless of how she might react. Giving her time won't help anything if she isn't willing to listen to you in the first place. It's a hard decision to make (especially if she reacts emotionally to it), but you've got to do it.
Keep in mind that you are not at fault in this situation, so don't let her blame you for anything (as she probably will). You've done nothing wrong here.
Most importantly, don't give up on yourself. Your life is worth more than this. Stay strong, brother.
+3@JustDragon Very true, it's actually quite good. It doesn't sink into mud since it's so light.
Ok but seriously this is actually MudRunner's equivalent of the Pigeon. Smol pickup boi who like to flip.
+1@JustDragon rip
I'm sure they'll get to it sooner or later. Thanks for letting me know though!
+1Does anyone else see everything after the description in italics?
Bypassing the auto credit system is a direct violation of the site rules.
Regardless of how much time and effort you put into modifying a build, in the end it still started as someone else's build, and you must credit them for that. Additionally, I find the claim that "AUTO CREDIT BRINGS DOWN UPVOTES WHEN YOU SHARE" to be, quite frankly, laughable. People don't choose to upvote something based on whether it is modified from someone else's build or not. People upvote stuff they like, and stuff they think is good.
+3@JustWingIt Haven't decided yet, but probably no more than 3-5.
+1@JustWingIt Well, maybe a little. I might dock a few points from the Build Quality section if it's based on someone else's build.
+1@JustWingIt Yeah, that would work as long as you make sufficient changes to it.
+1Continuing my streak of not following anyone because of how frequently I check the site anyway
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO That would be a folding wing, not a swing wing. Not the same thing.
+1@Souplane Technically yes, as long as it moves.
+1@speed72s Ask a moderator to make it a successor.
+1man wants us to do his programming homework for him
+1
+1Fuel > 0.95 ? Throttle : 0should work@Dragoranos Hmm.... not quite what I was thinking with this challenge but technically if the wings can pivot in-game it should be all good. Sounds interesting!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/1146332/How-to-change-your-profile-picture
+1All I will say is that the fastest plane on the site will not still be controllable. It is too fast.
@Brayden1981 Challenge is open until December 1, judging will be sometime after that.
Beanageddon
+1
+1clamp(sum(Pitch),-1,2)@Sterben214 Here's how to do it.
@DeezDucks Oh, right. Whoops.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Hrpj7U/OPEN-Swing-Wing-Challenge
Definitely tag me when you post it (whenever that ends up to be). That's awesome!
+1Time to abandon ship!
+1@DeezDucks @Vincent I know one of y'all knows how to make things successors
@DaKraken XML is perfectly ok.
Sorry, minimum for the challenge is 200 parts.
Not to mention the fact that she actually still flies pretty dang well once you get the gear up. Nothing ridiculous or anything, but more than you would expect. Sure, takeoffs can be tricky (I mean, the original creator even posted an updated version to "fix" the flying), and using the flaps just forces you into a dive, but with a careful hand at the controls, she still flies just fine.
+8@JesusChrist It's the
7.1 years agopart. AKA September 2015, AKA four months before the game was even released on Steam.In its day, this was quite literally the single best plane anyone had ever built. It had working landing gear, a working cockpit, working (single-shot) guns, and roundels, all long before the advent of hinge/small rotators, fuselage blocks, gauges, actual weapons, and FineTuner. This plane was legendary, and it was the best thing that those of us who were players at the time had ever seen.
+9@Roger747 Either publish it as a successor or ask (tag) a moderator to make it a successor to this challenge.
This is excellent!
+1