@edensk
Agreed.
It's a pain to tune it lol.
It either too sensitive or too inert.
The thing is when turning, the plane bleed so much speed the g drop so... yeah.
@NightRaven2233
It's ok.
This stuff takes time and my video just make your time more efficient.
But yeah... it still take time to learn.
Start small and master one topic at a time, if you start by copy and paste code blindly you'll get several problem at once.
@Blin1
It could be (+or-)Roll (+or-) RollRate/xxx depend on side and direction of rotator, you need to test them one by one.
CoM and CoL is just a rough estimation, it can be in whatever position that make the plane fly good, in this case it is too unstable and the tvc can't compensate.
Add whatever to the plane it doesn't matter.
What matter is you didn't build it from scratch but instead took parts from others and it is considered a bad practice if no credits is given.
You know.. even it is legal it still damage your reputation and that's long term damage, even worst than getting ban.
I thinks why this plane got so many report is that credit was not fully given, while the plane was credited, the add-on part was not, I don't know if this is against the rule but it is surely a bad practice.
@FarrowTECH
You need Funky-tree.
And a lot of patient.
@SatryawanArya
Comment the issue here so everyone know too.
I'm not always on Discord so.... comment here is better.
@PaulJohnLozada
That'll be pain in the bumbum for you to learn all this stuff.
But if you want to learn this, who am I to say no.
@ALRX
Thanks, hope you enjoy my PID infused flight model.
@KnightOfRen
Yesn't.
@Notaverage
Next plane maybe?
This Felon need some adversary.
@RYAviation
That's my weak point, I'm not good at modelling interior.
@edensk
Agreed.
It's a pain to tune it lol.
It either too sensitive or too inert.
The thing is when turning, the plane bleed so much speed the g drop so... yeah.
@dTitanplanesb
lol.
hmm.... what type of crime will it be...
Ah yes!!!
Felony.
@AcePlayer
I think the plane will lost it's shape.
Click here to go to the build!!!!
Click here to go to the build!!!!
Click here to go to the build!!!!
@NCorp
Yes.
It's about 500.
@NCorp
About 900.
@Luxray102 @DEADSHOT14
Thanks
@Victor4LoneSoldier
lol
Thanks.
@Tookan
Ok.
Tea away.
@AWESOMENESS360
Thanks.
Double flat spin for the win lol.
@Falco7
Thanks
@NightRaven2233
It took me several months so no need to rush lol.
@TigerSharkSP
lol
I did not.
The other is in fact an AI.
@NightRaven2233
I personally learn by taking other's build apart.
And use this for reference in code.
@NightRaven2233
It's ok.
This stuff takes time and my video just make your time more efficient.
But yeah... it still take time to learn.
Start small and master one topic at a time, if you start by copy and paste code blindly you'll get several problem at once.
@Blin1
It could be (+or-)Roll (+or-) RollRate/xxx depend on side and direction of rotator, you need to test them one by one.
CoM and CoL is just a rough estimation, it can be in whatever position that make the plane fly good, in this case it is too unstable and the tvc can't compensate.
Almost done...
It'll be out within this week.
Cleary you didn't follow the video at all.
Blindly copy and paste the code without knowing what they do won't help it either.
@Erc90F4RU
This definitely not my plane lol.
But the code writing style is quite similar to mine ngl.
@WiniMii
No.
I didn't plan to do AC SU-57.
But PSM is guaranteed.
@SuperSuperTheSylph
Yeah.
It need a bit of fine tuning but I can confirm that this plane fly nicely.
@Notaverage
Maybe.
@HorneyIbee
Ok.
@WiniMii
It just a black Wyvern in an early stage which is still have SP default color scheme.
@ChrisPy
Might be for low part version,
@CaptainSquadronLeaderX @ws @WiniMii @BlackThuNDR
I'll prepare the tags for you.
@trios21
I've done that a while ago.
This.
And this.
@Hellosss38
lol
I'm slow.
@Meyerbb
Take this document and find damperMultiplier, I sure it'll help.
Paneling 95%
Landing gear 90%
Flight model 90%
Livery 0%
Funky tree 80%
Almost there lol.
Add whatever to the plane it doesn't matter.
What matter is you didn't build it from scratch but instead took parts from others and it is considered a bad practice if no credits is given.
You know.. even it is legal it still damage your reputation and that's long term damage, even worst than getting ban.
I thinks why this plane got so many report is that credit was not fully given, while the plane was credited, the add-on part was not, I don't know if this is against the rule but it is surely a bad practice.
@Astro12
Yes, it's SU-57 Felon, that's why I name this post as it is.
@MAHADI
Thanks.
@WiniMii
Indeed it is.
@BlackThuNDR
Still a long way for me to go.
@ChrisPy
You made those nice looking aircraft without paneling?
lol
Kudos to you too.
@Nerfaddict
It's worth losing sanity for after all.
@RandomUser09
Auto aim is op lol.
@Technodium
Thanks.
It takes a lot for me to be here so take your time.
@Nerfaddict
I've been a avoiding stealthy looking plane until now.
So...
Paneling = pain
Funky tree = other kind of pain
fml.... I love it!!