@One2
True, it is just an upscaled VTOL thrust port exhaust so it'll not look as good as custom afterburner.
F-22 afterburner do look thick messy in night time though and I like the look of it so I make it this way rather than in daylight where afterburner is drowned in the sunlight.
But yeah, I already changed the size so it'll not as thick in the final build.
Also, one T for you.
@WIZARD2017
Actually I started building this right after I posted my SU-57 so... I think it not that fast for this 600 parts build.
And a large potion of that time frame went into flight model.
@Kangy
The flight control to compensate for lack of 3d tvc fascinated me the most, I just know recently that at high aoa and low speed the Raptor move one vertical stabilizer down to such angle that it create drag (and stall the surface to not produce much lift so the aircraft won't roll) to produce yaw moment.
And yes, I added that kind of control into my Raptor.
@hfusiwjf29
idk if that's the case.
But I can guarantee that it'll be the most advance fly-by-wire F-22 out there, as you can see I perform those stunts with relative ease and my only problem is I can't see where I'm going with that free cam view.
@An2k
F-22 is not VTOL by any means but it can certainly climb straight up thanks to it's powerful engines, you can easily search the video of the Raptor doing that.
Also I flew pretty much blind (this vid is actually POV of me flying) so crashing is not uncommon lol.
Fun fact :
I don't know what your sewer system is like but from my experience, we need to put sandbags in the toilet and on top of the drain or the sewer will rush back out.
@Rakoval500k
That's one way to do it.
What you've described is passive stability.
But this plane's purpose is to demonstrate the correction of yaw axis by using differential airbrake which is artificial stability, it'll lose control when the system is disabled.
@Mustang51
Me neither.
I remember vaguely when this plane comes to WT and they used this unusual wing spoilers as a selling point. (As if 6xMG151/20 Minengeschoß was not impressive enough)
@ThatKindaWeeb
I'm happy to hear that.
Actually the strategy I suggest was a mix of Buddhism and Stoicism if you are interest.
It help me a lot in life so I think it'll help you as well.
Pain is temporally, art is eternal.
But seriously, you'll know it is valid criticism when you see one, other than that it is just someone who want to feel better about themselves by stepping on other people.
I know it's a pain to admit to myself that my hard work is flawed but that's the process of being better, there is no shame in that, it'll show how confident you are to not be bothered by the fact that you are flawed.
I always view criticism as "if you criticize my work that's mean you interest in it" so I think you can always ask them for more information about the thing they criticize me for.
And when you start discussing the flaw in your work, that's when you will receive some genuine advice or the fake criticism will fall apart.
You can see how difficult it is to land in that camera angle at 1:32 judging by how the mouse is moving franticly.
And I didn't expect that yeet bomb though.
@Beefy
I see, rpm can be accessed only via xml so that'll be nice if we can configurate it in menu.
I don't know if we can set the propeller rpm irl but I think max rpm in game was treated as maximum rpm that will not break the propeller.
I'm not sure if this is what you looking for but I you have throttle and propeller pitch assign to separate control by setting pitch control to manual and then set throttle governor to disable in prop menu, throttle control engine power and VTOL control propeller pitch by default.
From there I can get my prop to overspeed and eventually break by simply going max throttle and 0 degrees pitch.
Or I can go max propeller pitch and full throttle at low rpm and the prop can't get rpm due to too much drag, it need to rev up the rpm to get the momentum going.
Same goes to heli blades as well.
.
.
Or am I just miss your point completely lol.
Center of mass is a bit off so it'll be a bit unforgiving to fly.
Mass is lower than original, try to keep it close to the original to preserve acceleration and t/w ratio.
Landing gear act weird I think it is because stock gear can't handle the weight without extensive xml modifying.
Other than that, it's ok.
@Rakoval500k
tbh it's been too long I can't remember the code lol.
I think there are a number at the end of the code that is in the form of clamp(some FT formular)/15, you can edit that 15 to firing arc you want and edit the range of motion of the rotator to match the 15 you just edit in the code.
And you need to do this 2 time, for vertical and horizontal rotator.
@ReverseEngineerer
Yes you can.
But make sure center of mass and center of lift stay in the same place so to preserve the plane's performance and stability. (if it become too unstable there will be no amount of FT that can fix it)
And yes, weight do affect the performance in acceleration, t/w ratio, wing loading and
a little bit of stability, but most importantly if wing loading is too low it'll not perform PSM because it can't stall.
The good.
The BRRRRRRRT.
And the ugly.
@One2
+2True, it is just an upscaled VTOL thrust port exhaust so it'll not look as good as custom afterburner.
F-22 afterburner do look thick messy in night time though and I like the look of it so I make it this way rather than in daylight where afterburner is drowned in the sunlight.
But yeah, I already changed the size so it'll not as thick in the final build.
Also, one T for you.
@Nerfaddict
One T for you.
@One2
Why?
@lemoose
I've actually watched a lot of F-22 airshow videos just to make this build lol.
Hey, if you going to post someone else's plane, make sure to modify it or it is against the rules.
+1@WIZARD2017
Actually I started building this right after I posted my SU-57 so... I think it not that fast for this 600 parts build.
And a large potion of that time frame went into flight model.
@Kangy
+1Nice.
I wish I have a chance to see it irl.
@aaronneit
Nice.
@Kangy
+3The flight control to compensate for lack of 3d tvc fascinated me the most, I just know recently that at high aoa and low speed the Raptor move one vertical stabilizer down to such angle that it create drag (and stall the surface to not produce much lift so the aircraft won't roll) to produce yaw moment.
And yes, I added that kind of control into my Raptor.
@hfusiwjf29
idk if that's the case.
But I can guarantee that it'll be the most advance fly-by-wire F-22 out there, as you can see I perform those stunts with relative ease and my only problem is I can't see where I'm going with that free cam view.
@Kangy
+1It barely did those stunts I have to say.
2D tvc is so limiting imo.
@ws
+1lol
Same stunt routine but F-22 struggling to keep up.
@aaronneit
+1Thanks.
Give it some more time and be patient, basically do a lot trial and error and you'll succeed eventually.
@aaronneit
No need.
I believe you can fix it by yourself.
This plane is too unstable.
+1Canards is underpower so it won't offer much help in normal flight.
@BlackThuNDR
+1I made this plane with realistic performance in mind so it'll be challenging but I think it is still possible to defeat those AI.
@ChrisPy
lol
PID is kind of it own thing.
It took me so long to tune it.
This plane is indeed a copy of my plane.
+1Also the act of replacing the cockpit block is very suspicious, it is a way to circumvent auto credit system.
@CC1010 @BeastHunter @FrostyYeti
+2Thanks for support.
@WiniMii
I'll keep it under 1000.
@An2k
+1F-22 is not VTOL by any means but it can certainly climb straight up thanks to it's powerful engines, you can easily search the video of the Raptor doing that.
Also I flew pretty much blind (this vid is actually POV of me flying) so crashing is not uncommon lol.
@DEADSHOT14
idk.
It still not finish.
Paneling 100%
Landing gear 90%
Flight model 95%
Livery 50%
Funky tree 98%
Interior 0%
It's been a while lol.
Just witness how smooth it fly, for now.
Fun fact :
I don't know what your sewer system is like but from my experience, we need to put sandbags in the toilet and on top of the drain or the sewer will rush back out.
@Rakoval500k
+1That's one way to do it.
What you've described is passive stability.
But this plane's purpose is to demonstrate the correction of yaw axis by using differential airbrake which is artificial stability, it'll lose control when the system is disabled.
@Highbraker
lol.
Impressively mad, I think.
@Mustang51
+1Me neither.
I remember vaguely when this plane comes to WT and they used this unusual wing spoilers as a selling point. (As if 6xMG151/20 Minengeschoß was not impressive enough)
@IceCraft
No?
At least not immediately.
@IceCraft
+1Thanks
@Mustang51
This plane actually have no ailerons, surfaces on the wings is flaps.
They use wings spoiler to roll instead of ailerons.
@OldTV
Don't beg for upvotes, it is against the rules.
Also this is how you get yourself banned.
@ThatKindaWeeb
I'm happy to hear that.
Actually the strategy I suggest was a mix of Buddhism and Stoicism if you are interest.
It help me a lot in life so I think it'll help you as well.
Pain is temporally, art is eternal.
+1But seriously, you'll know it is valid criticism when you see one, other than that it is just someone who want to feel better about themselves by stepping on other people.
I know it's a pain to admit to myself that my hard work is flawed but that's the process of being better, there is no shame in that, it'll show how confident you are to not be bothered by the fact that you are flawed.
I always view criticism as "if you criticize my work that's mean you interest in it" so I think you can always ask them for more information about the thing they criticize me for.
And when you start discussing the flaw in your work, that's when you will receive some genuine advice or the fake criticism will fall apart.
You can see how difficult it is to land in that camera angle at 1:32 judging by how the mouse is moving franticly.
And I didn't expect that yeet bomb though.
@Highbraker
Those are not helmet to begin with...
@Beefy
+1lol
I think that will not lower the prop rpm by any mean, it tell the prop when to break instead.
@Beefy
+1I see, rpm can be accessed only via xml so that'll be nice if we can configurate it in menu.
I don't know if we can set the propeller rpm irl but I think max rpm in game was treated as maximum rpm that will not break the propeller.
I'm not sure if this is what you looking for but I you have throttle and propeller pitch assign to separate control by setting pitch control to manual and then set throttle governor to disable in prop menu, throttle control engine power and VTOL control propeller pitch by default.
+2From there I can get my prop to overspeed and eventually break by simply going max throttle and 0 degrees pitch.
Or I can go max propeller pitch and full throttle at low rpm and the prop can't get rpm due to too much drag, it need to rev up the rpm to get the momentum going.
Same goes to heli blades as well.
.
.
Or am I just miss your point completely lol.
@Grroro
Thanks.
For camera, I use Free cam mod and default camera.
@Toaste
HERE
@Toaste
No.
But there is a mod for it.
@Highbraker
Yes, be sure to credit.
@Adamjpotatos
My code don't work for 360 degrees and I don't know how to do that as of now.
@Adamjpotatos
+1What do you mean by type of code?
It's just basically math equation with some boolean operator mixing in.
Center of mass is a bit off so it'll be a bit unforgiving to fly.
+4Mass is lower than original, try to keep it close to the original to preserve acceleration and t/w ratio.
Landing gear act weird I think it is because stock gear can't handle the weight without extensive xml modifying.
Other than that, it's ok.
@Fox00One
lol
Your friend would be mad when they found out this plane is a 22.
More explosion.
+5More debris.
Less plane.
@Rakoval500k
tbh it's been too long I can't remember the code lol.
I think there are a number at the end of the code that is in the form of clamp(some FT formular)/15, you can edit that 15 to firing arc you want and edit the range of motion of the rotator to match the 15 you just edit in the code.
And you need to do this 2 time, for vertical and horizontal rotator.
@ReverseEngineerer
+1Yes you can.
But make sure center of mass and center of lift stay in the same place so to preserve the plane's performance and stability. (if it become too unstable there will be no amount of FT that can fix it)
And yes, weight do affect the performance in acceleration, t/w ratio, wing loading and
a little bit of stability, but most importantly if wing loading is too low it'll not perform PSM because it can't stall.