@Highbraker
Don't take my SU-57 for any fact lol, it's tvc is based on mostly unknown 2nd stage engine which I didn't really know how it work so I just made it that it'll have thrust vectoring regardless of circumstance, plus it's a nice eye candy.
@Highbraker
So you going to tell me that they using roll tvc for high speed only?
That doesn't make any sense.
In airshow there is a lot of opportunity to use roll tvc (in post-stall stunts) and I see none, so I doubt if it is really implemented in the Raptor.
At high speed, control surfaces are more than enough to overload the plane structure (and of course overload human pilot), tvc comes to shine when using control surfaces is not effective such as low IAS or high speed trimming where control surfaces produce too much drag.
@Highbraker
I've watched that before.
There's no mention in roll tvc.
Or maybe I miss it since English is not my first language. (point the time which he speak about roll tvc)
Also, how do you claim "the roll is only in use in high speed combat maneuver"?
@Highbraker
How about low speed roll where ailerons are not effective, why they not using it?
Just point me to the source you are using because it sound a lot like bs to me.
I want solid proof to backup your claim, not just some random discussion.
@Highbraker
Yeah, I know that it can technically have pitch + roll tvc but I haven't found a solid evidence that confirm or denial the existence of roll tvc.
I've watched a lot of F-22 airshow and I never see tvc doing roll control, even when testing on the ground so I'm leaning toward pitch only tvc.
Also there are a lot of discussion about roll tvc everywhere (Quora, aviation.stackexchange, you name it) so I think it make a lot of sense to make the tvc pitch only according to what can be seen in the video rather than some discussion.
@V1PER5
As I said, I didn't care about speed beyond the design limit and you modified the plane to go to that speed, doing that usually break the FT coding.
@MSCworldXD
Yep, that's me.
But this is not the plane in the video because this was built long after I made the video.
This is an AI version of that plane.
@V1PER5
I assume you talking about 900 mph as IAS because only that will cause the plane to wobble.
For me the control just a little sensitive but not wobbly when I go 900 mph, FT code depends much on the machine you are using.
I didn't care much about speed pass 900 mph IAS because most fighter irl can't go pass that speed without some serious problem anyway. (even the Raptor have top speed of 921 mph IAS)
@Kurzweil
+1lol
idk Maybe.
@Sergio666
+1Thanks, my building technique may not be top tier but I believe my FT is close to that lol.
@TheSolarFlare
+1Thanks.
@Grroro
Nice.
A lot of this build's details about Raptor behavior come from this MIT class.
@Nerfaddict
lol
Not anymore.
@HungryBoat2
Hmm...
Refund the calculator and buy a new one lol.
@KnightOfRen
Yes.
This is DCS lol.
@Falco7
oh lol.
You can just follow me instead.
Because tagging in every project is kinda against the rules.
@DameTheMobileFriendly
+2Thanks.
@AvalonIndustries
Post it as unlisted and tag me, I'm rarely using Discord now.
@Falco7
I normally not building by request by any mean but go ahead.
I want to see if that's what on my mind.
@HungryBoat2
Hmm...
Just turn the calculator off and turn it back on again.
@Nerfaddict
You'd be fine...
Nothing bad will happen to the airplane.
But that's just a theory.
@Astro12
Go ahead, more of cinematic won't hurt lol.
Even more requested tags : @CygnusMei @Sergio666 @ACEPILOT109
More requested tags : @PHURH @Sparky6004 @Strikercritsilver
+1Some requested tags : @BeastHunter @Nerfaddict @One2
Requested tags : @MrShenanigans @ws @WiniMii
It's finished.
Raptor
@HungryBoat2
+1According to my calculation, yes.
But hey... I'm bad at math.
@HungryBoat2
Nah.. it's P-61 Black Widow.
@Yosann
Thanks.
@Ilikeacecombat
Hope that doesn't break FT.
Because low fps often break FT.
@Victor4LoneSoldier2
Yes, with some difficulty, as I demonstrated in earlier video.
@Kurzweil
+1I actually make my tvc roll controllable but is locked by AG.
I just want to know if I miss anything in my little research.
@Ilikeacecombat
Thanks.
Hope you can run sub 500 parts potato version though.
@FeatherWing
Thank you.
@Highbraker
+1Don't take my SU-57 for any fact lol, it's tvc is based on mostly unknown 2nd stage engine which I didn't really know how it work so I just made it that it'll have thrust vectoring regardless of circumstance, plus it's a nice eye candy.
@Highbraker
So you going to tell me that they using roll tvc for high speed only?
That doesn't make any sense.
In airshow there is a lot of opportunity to use roll tvc (in post-stall stunts) and I see none, so I doubt if it is really implemented in the Raptor.
At high speed, control surfaces are more than enough to overload the plane structure (and of course overload human pilot), tvc comes to shine when using control surfaces is not effective such as low IAS or high speed trimming where control surfaces produce too much drag.
@Highbraker
Yeah, joke aside, how do you know "the roll is only in use in high speed combat maneuver" is true.
@Highbraker
+1I've watched that before.
There's no mention in roll tvc.
Or maybe I miss it since English is not my first language. (point the time which he speak about roll tvc)
Also, how do you claim "the roll is only in use in high speed combat maneuver"?
@CaptainSkylark Thanks
@Highbraker
How about low speed roll where ailerons are not effective, why they not using it?
Just point me to the source you are using because it sound a lot like bs to me.
I want solid proof to backup your claim, not just some random discussion.
@Highbraker
+1Yeah, I know that it can technically have pitch + roll tvc but I haven't found a solid evidence that confirm or denial the existence of roll tvc.
I've watched a lot of F-22 airshow and I never see tvc doing roll control, even when testing on the ground so I'm leaning toward pitch only tvc.
Also there are a lot of discussion about roll tvc everywhere (Quora, aviation.stackexchange, you name it) so I think it make a lot of sense to make the tvc pitch only according to what can be seen in the video rather than some discussion.
@MrShenanigans
lol
Thanks for chickens.
@FireWolfMusic
Thank you.
@Pyrrha
Thanks.
@Highbraker
If you have a solid evidence that F-22 tvc provided roll control please send it to me.
Because I can't find anything.
@AWESOMENESS360
lol
Head-on attack is a game of chicken, there is one chicken or there is no chicken.
@ReinMcDeer
+1Yeah, that's a tough time for AC fans.
@Sparky6004
lol
At first I was going to use Warrior but so many people use it so....
I end up with this.
@HelloHelloTheUnt
Yeah.
I only make it control only pitch and a little bit of yaw by differential thrust.
I love the camera work so much, not just default in-game camera angle.
@V1PER5
+1As I said, I didn't care about speed beyond the design limit and you modified the plane to go to that speed, doing that usually break the FT coding.
looking back at my Wyvwrns
+1Hmm... I think they deserved a revisit.
@MSCworldXD
Yep, that's me.
But this is not the plane in the video because this was built long after I made the video.
This is an AI version of that plane.
@HungryBoat2
I can't fool your sharp eyes after all.
@duckyPY
Maybe I'll try making prop.
No promise though.
Propeller planes is not my jams.
@V1PER5
+1I assume you talking about 900 mph as IAS because only that will cause the plane to wobble.
For me the control just a little sensitive but not wobbly when I go 900 mph, FT code depends much on the machine you are using.
I didn't care much about speed pass 900 mph IAS because most fighter irl can't go pass that speed without some serious problem anyway. (even the Raptor have top speed of 921 mph IAS)
@SimplyPlain
Now I have that music stuck in my head lol.