@Rb2h
Thats the idea
This plane is fast but not agile.
Long range or high velocity missiles would do the trick as well
(Wow I just saw how old this post was, damn.)
@Rb2h the "stabilizer" wings?
Admittedly I dont know what I was thinking when I had the idea to add them
Kudos for searching out a two year old post though
A long time ago I formulated some functions in Desmos which would "sharpen" or blunt the peaks of the sine wave, I just have to find it and use it one of these days
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. Just waiting for that to release
But until then Ive really just been testing proof of concepts and mechanisms in SP
MIght release my entire collection of unfinished craft when that happens
Im not gonna get too deep into this, but I will.
So the security issue with the proposed ban on Tiktok as an issue of national security is not the content people share on that platform, but the information the app collects on its own. Passively it collects personal information on its users, such as names, email addresses, and payment information, as well as (I believe) IP addresses to access the servers.
The problem with this is that, as evidenced with the Bytedance representative's dodgy language and deliberate half-answers in the testimony seem to point out that the Chinese government has free reign to access this data at will. This is a foreign government with access personal information of American citizens, possibly as well as (based on their content), interests, appearance, and who knows what else the app is monitoring.
I dont know about you but that is a significant information security hazard.
Now I dont like the government either but for a completely different reason.
The legislature on this proposed ban opens a door to denial of service for any piece of software deemed a threat, and knowing the government this is extremely risky territory.
While Tiktok is full of degenerates and played a large part in the downfall of my generation, the fallout of this ban could have untold consequences
Yeah the government is run by a bunch of idiots, but not for the reason you present.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk
I thought this was a forum for an airplane game bro
+3I dunno man Ive already been using ti a lot
@Rb2h yeap
@Rb2h
Thats the idea
This plane is fast but not agile.
Long range or high velocity missiles would do the trick as well
(Wow I just saw how old this post was, damn.)
This reminds me I gotta finally play Peace Walker some time.
@Strucker
...
+1I clicked on this trying to find out what the title meant but will leave more confused than I started...
Arwing my beloved
+1if theyre hungry, feed them. put more intakes.
(explosion sound effect)
N o t a c r a s h
I mean Ive been out of the game for a while but on occasion I still make proof of concepts for mechanisms
@Rb2h the "stabilizer" wings?
Admittedly I dont know what I was thinking when I had the idea to add them
Kudos for searching out a two year old post though
@Graingy
This post was fact checked to be true by real American patriots
fuselage slicing will be invaluable for the VTOL systems here
+1Great to see you made it this far, my friend. I wish you the best of luck in the future
Short boi
Countach my beloved
@Transair56 If you count the other comment its 6 new
here, let me give you another dose of dopamine.
+1917, my beloved
@CR929thenewSPplayer Nah, I was just quoting Ace Combat Zero
+1A long time ago I formulated some functions in Desmos which would "sharpen" or blunt the peaks of the sine wave, I just have to find it and use it one of these days
<< You shall fall to your deaths and lead the way for the SOLG as it smashes into the Earth! >> @ReinMcDeer
+1Restore the pride you had 15 years ago
+1Yeah, my thoughts exactly. Just waiting for that to release
But until then Ive really just been testing proof of concepts and mechanisms in SP
MIght release my entire collection of unfinished craft when that happens
@DatRoadTrainGuy19 it will be after this season
+1@PapaKernels The short track by me is being torn down to build a
Fcking Walmart
Its sad
sad how these smaller tracks are pretty much completely overlooked in the grand scheme of things.
+1Good to see posts like this
@PPLLAANNEE
Figured it might be good for screenshots. Ill get to work on refining it
nice
I built a minecraft styled plane because of mods like this, I might post it. We'll see.
@antares1
+1Night Raven Moment
absolute madman
And also with you, by friend
God invented algae by dude
well the more fellas on board, the merrier
(I say this a literally all of my jets are single pilot)
Absolutely beautiful
I don't have the set, but take it from me:
Building Lego sets in SP is really fun
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
hmm yess I will now drop a torpedo from orbit
Im not gonna get too deep into this, but I will.
+2So the security issue with the proposed ban on Tiktok as an issue of national security is not the content people share on that platform, but the information the app collects on its own. Passively it collects personal information on its users, such as names, email addresses, and payment information, as well as (I believe) IP addresses to access the servers.
The problem with this is that, as evidenced with the Bytedance representative's dodgy language and deliberate half-answers in the testimony seem to point out that the Chinese government has free reign to access this data at will. This is a foreign government with access personal information of American citizens, possibly as well as (based on their content), interests, appearance, and who knows what else the app is monitoring.
I dont know about you but that is a significant information security hazard.
Now I dont like the government either but for a completely different reason.
The legislature on this proposed ban opens a door to denial of service for any piece of software deemed a threat, and knowing the government this is extremely risky territory.
While Tiktok is full of degenerates and played a large part in the downfall of my generation, the fallout of this ban could have untold consequences
Yeah the government is run by a bunch of idiots, but not for the reason you present.
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk
@Xandycandy89 well in all fairness youre posting at 3-4 times the rate I do.
What Im saying is that the P-63 has a more accurate 37 mm, but the P-39 has higher mobility, so I use the P-39
@Xandycandy89 yeah. the '63 has the upgraded cannon but the '39 can still at least somewhat turn.
@Xandycandy89 Yeah its great when you land that '37 on a fighter, but its rare.
@Xandycandy89
P-39s are all I used to play in WT but I just dont play anymore for various reasons
I am a simple man. I see Airacobra, I upvote.
@Robomo00119 I'd like to, but as I said Im short on spare time with work and college and all
I can do a mean splinter scheme, its just that I dont have a lot of free time anymore
I am a simple man
I see Kingcobra, I upvote.
(I didnt manage to fit a bolded T in there so here it is)
that'd be sick
@ollielebananiaCFSP A lot of the more complex canard strings do get very complicated
+2the triangle is just a cool shape for roundels