yeah this is the version that still had, like 200 missiles... The reason being was screenshots, and I didn't want to have to restart every time a shot didn't go quite as planned. The standalone post has much less missiles and is waaay more potato friendly.
@JSwannyGaming148 I thought long and hard about what to use... and I had many fond memories of it. The lego set in question is set 70003: Eagle Interceptor
@JSwannyGaming148 Sweet! I've had this thing for 8 years... finally it can come out of storage for a brief time... I will remake it as best as I can. I will omit the exposed studs because putting so many all over the plane would be both tedious and possibly destroy the aerodynamics. I will also take some artistic liberties on how it would fly, too.
dude that sounds so cool! now I gotta pick a good example...
Done. I know a lego brick is shown in the thumbnail, but what if I used a specific lego set? I have a wonderful idea. (And it's a plane, so I can make it flyyyy)
I agree. I think the limit based on rank is a good idea. Mostly because We don't want spam of low effort planes. I do not mean to devalue the creations of lower ranked users, (Me being one of them...) I regularly browse the newest creations tab and find really good ideas and concepts. I believe that this rule is fair, because, let's face it... People worked really hard to get those high ranks, and to give them perks other than a certain high number by their username is something I would encourage. However... One might argue that it gives an "unfair" advantage to these users, and my opinion on that subject is that 1.) It's not unfair if you earn it, and 2.) Since the amount of points required to get to the next rank grows exponentially, I think is actually an inhibitor based on the overall consistent quality of the builds of higher ranked users. Thank you for attending my TED talk
(I am open for discussion regarding this topic, so if you have any comments, just @ me in the chat.)
As Uncel said, welcome to SP!
That. Sounds. Awesome!
@FOXLOVER I'm not sure about that... I'm just sharing a discovery for the better of the community
@Ouroboros it definately won't take the two years it took for me to get here if all goes well
@FireFast212 I dunno. I guess it's just a variation of "lol" of pronoubced like a word? That's my guess
Putting the bombs on the tail is an... Interesting choice...
@OPaiTaOn that's another good idea. I'm gonna start experimenting.
+2@FireFast212 No clue... Probably a modification of my SC-32.
Consider me on board!
@FireFast212 yeeeah! Thank you for the follow, by the way!
@FireFast212 lel
Thomas the Thermonuclear Bomb
+1EeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEe
yeah this is the version that still had, like 200 missiles... The reason being was screenshots, and I didn't want to have to restart every time a shot didn't go quite as planned. The standalone post has much less missiles and is waaay more potato friendly.
@EchoWhiskey11 not quite VTOL, just rediculously STOL
+1WOW A MiG-23!
@Astro12 thank you!
@TheTomatoLover I posted that standalone plane just before this one if you're interested :D
+1Gonna get tons of points from my juicy upload, @JSwannyGaming148
@50CalChicken It's interesting
+1@50CalChicken hmmst
It's not often you see a curved wing
+1psst wanna make it functional? If so, then nudge a bomb into the nose and it will go booom upon hitting something.
Better than mine. Mine can't fly to save it's life.
... I'm pretty sure this is a ADF-01 Falken... Not the Adler. Funny thing is, The Falken does actually have a gold skin in some games.
Looks like if the P-59 and the F-89 combined
Duuuuuuuuuuude epiiiiic
@chibikitsune thank you!
@Aviator007 I like it! The orange color is an interesting color choice
I had to do it. you're copper now.
@Astro12 Thank you so much!
+1H M M M
I built something eerily similar yesterday...
Im sure its just coincidence.
little late to the party, but creative!
More missions like this, please!
@JSwannyGaming148 alright I'll see if I can improve it.
You beat the game
@JSwannyGaming148 Noted
F A S T
@JSwannyGaming148 Thank you!
This is also the first build of this vehicle on the SP website!
(And my most popular build yet...)
T H I C C
+1I'm keeping that.
@P0TET0Z alrighty.
@P0TET0Z I do, indeed, have discord, but It's doing well so far...
@JSwannyGaming148 Keep in mind, there are some pieces missing on my example, but I'll make it work :) The scale will be .5 units per stud area
@JSwannyGaming148 I thought long and hard about what to use... and I had many fond memories of it. The lego set in question is set 70003: Eagle Interceptor
@JSwannyGaming148 Sweet! I've had this thing for 8 years... finally it can come out of storage for a brief time... I will remake it as best as I can. I will omit the exposed studs because putting so many all over the plane would be both tedious and possibly destroy the aerodynamics. I will also take some artistic liberties on how it would fly, too.
Massive
dude that sounds so cool! now I gotta pick a good example...
Done. I know a lego brick is shown in the thumbnail, but what if I used a specific lego set? I have a wonderful idea. (And it's a plane, so I can make it flyyyy)
I agree. I think the limit based on rank is a good idea. Mostly because We don't want spam of low effort planes. I do not mean to devalue the creations of lower ranked users, (Me being one of them...) I regularly browse the newest creations tab and find really good ideas and concepts. I believe that this rule is fair, because, let's face it... People worked really hard to get those high ranks, and to give them perks other than a certain high number by their username is something I would encourage.
However... One might argue that it gives an "unfair" advantage to these users, and my opinion on that subject is that 1.) It's not unfair if you earn it, and 2.) Since the amount of points required to get to the next rank grows exponentially, I think is actually an inhibitor based on the overall consistent quality of the builds of higher ranked users.
Thank you for attending my TED talk
(I am open for discussion regarding this topic, so if you have any comments, just @ me in the chat.)