3,315 Galeo Comments

  • Master Caution System 23 days ago

    @mrxml this will put out false/true 4 times per second If you need 1 and 0 add clamp01() the full term would be clamp01(round(0.5cos(Time1440)+0.5)=1).
    I hope this was helpful. there should be stars for multiply betwen cos/0.5 an Time/1440

  • Master Caution System 23 days ago

    @mrxml round(0.5cos(Time1440)+0.5)=1 should work

  • The Entire History of the A-40 Havoc II 28 days ago

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover niiiiice. You surely stepped up your game. If there is enough time to finish my curent project..............;-) We will meet again competing for great victory ;-) I am working on something like the loyal wingman-concept. Tricky but cool if i can pull it off. See ya

    +1
  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml i checked it again. It does now aswell, but it didnt during my development. Maybe i messed with the wrong parameters and made it a little bit more complicated then necessary

  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml okay it was not working on my computer. I had to hit the button again

  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml reason 1 there are several cannons with different angles for my adaptive spread configuration
    reason 2 the cannons shoot when the button FireWeapons is pushed, but only one. for another round you have to release fire weapons and push it again. I interrupt the pushed button by activating and deactivating the aviation group.
    the input changes from true to false multiple times per second and releases a shot every time.
    Was that helpful?
    I was experimenting with a missile launch system that would multiply on the way to its target. Launch one and watch 10 missiles impact.
    Things like this are possible with custom-AGs.
    The input would be something like:
    sum(Activate3&TargetSelected)>TargetDistance/Missilespeed*0.9or0.8
    this input specified for the AG of a detacher would have make it detach after the missile traveled 90% of the way.
    If AG3 initiated the launch.
    complicated but cool.

  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml do you need help with one of your projects?

  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml do you need help with one of your projects?

  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml i checked your profile. you should be familiar with xml editing. i created a custam aviationgroup that is controlled by a cosinusfunction and time. It turns your AG on and off multiple times per minute. The cannon shoots like you were hammering the fireweapon button very fast. I used a cannon and made a heavy machinegun with it. I m glad you like it

  • InfiniteBlade one month ago

    @mrxml with funky trees input. Snowflake posted a guide on Github. Very useful. it takes a while to get into building with funky trees but its worth the effort. The Autogun is located below the cockpit. Hide the parts and take alook at it. If you give me some credit for it you can copy the Autogun to your subassys and use it on your plane. Enjoy

  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @CrestelAeronautics thanks. looks cool and i am glad you like it

  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @Graingy it flies well on linux with outdated hardware ;-)

  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @TheMouse thanks for the good rating. I am working on a doomsday-missile-launch-system. Maybe i will upload a version equiped with it. I will have to reduce some parts inorder to do so. The Beaconlights will have to go

    +1
  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @Graingy the engine configuration is not build for efficiency. its build for performance. Thats what causes the high performance cost

  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @Noname918181818181818181 that was what i intended. thanks

    +1
  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @TheMouse thanks

  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @TheMouse thanks

  • Challenge-OP-Moebius one month ago

    @Graingy thanks, but why can you not test it?

    +1
  • C-Glider one month ago

    @florky thanks

  • C-Glider one month ago

    @SyntheticL thanks

  • FXFunkyTrees one month ago

    @Mousewithamachinegun122 i will check on it.my new project seems funky and challenging so maybe this will be my post for your challenge

    +1
  • C-Glider one month ago

    @Mousewithamachinegun122 i am glad you like it

    +1
  • C-Glider one month ago

    @TheGliderGuy its kind of a glider ;-) the controls are a little to thrustbased to be a real glider. This design could fly and behave pleasent, if i did my math right

    +1
  • FXFunkyTrees 8 months ago

    @Xx24reminder we had that discussion on previous builds ;-)

  • FXFunkyTrees 8 months ago

    @Dpdfuzz thanks. it took a little while to figure it out

  • FXFunkyTrees 8 months ago

    @Xx24reminder Nope

  • FXFunkyTrees 9 months ago

    @MobileBuilder21 thanks

  • FXFunkyTrees 9 months ago

    @MrCOPTY Thats true, but i avoided complicated trigonometric functions by using 5. The improved version includes bulletspeed and ratio of TargetHeading and TargetElevation. Much more acurate. Maybe i will figure out how to do it with two on my next build.

    +1
  • FXFunkyTrees 9 months ago

    thanks for the upvotes. I fixed the autogun, i wil reupload with improved autogun,

  • Silentapproach 3.2 years ago

    If requested i will upload a version of this plane with weapons attached

  • manta 4.0 years ago

    thanks for all the upvotes. Its the desired appreciation of the afford i put in the build, what was more than initialy expected.

  • manta 4.0 years ago

    @MAHADI yes i did. If you change the scale their halo becomes bigger too ;-)

  • manta 4.0 years ago

    finaly fixed the pictures

  • manta 4.0 years ago

    why do the screenshots in the discription not work?
    did they change the command?
    ![](link of picture) was the command. is it blocked or changed?

  • manta 4.0 years ago

    @Shaini thanks

  • Saltwater Strike Challenge Results!!! 4.4 years ago

    @TheFantasticTyphoon thanks :-)

  • shark 4.6 years ago

    @Plane66373637ALTERNATE dododod black baby shark dodod....

  • shark 4.6 years ago

    @Planebuilder09 beautiful and a little insane isn`t it?

  • blackwidow 4.6 years ago

    @TrislandianAlliance i will check the epic anime fail before i consider watching the full series ;-)

  • blackwidow 4.6 years ago

    @TrislandianAlliance big Mangafan i see. I did not watch Gintama yet. but i wil

  • blackwidow 4.6 years ago

    @USSR thanks for the spotlight

  • blackwidow 4.6 years ago

    @Thecatbaron thanks for the spotlight

  • Bumblebee 4.6 years ago

    Hy you want me to change the description? No Problem and I`m not surtain what generation it is myself ;-)

  • Bumblebee 4.7 years ago

    @Baldeagle086 thanks for the spotlight

  • Bumblebee 4.7 years ago

    @TheFantasticTyphoon yes i checked it a couple of minutes ago and couldnt avoid to smile because both of the first two entrys dont fullfill the rules ;-)

  • Bumblebee 4.7 years ago

    @TheFantasticTyphoon thanks and I`m fine with it

    +1
  • Bumblebee 4.7 years ago

    @TheFantasticTyphoon oh sorry, so there is no way for this aircraft to compete?
    Can i build another one?

  • Bumblebee 4.7 years ago

    @TheFantasticTyphoon what rule does not fit?

  • final space 3 edit 4.7 years ago

    @armanla777 you are welcome

  • final space 3 edit 4.7 years ago

    @armanla777 as long as you like it I`m happy. It took me a little while but i learned interesting stuff and progressed a lot by building it. Do you want any changes?