Interesting, but if you can make it a little smaller, mainly in the length, then that would be great. I just forgot to add a size restriction to the rules
@TakicraftCorporation
Well, as long as it's small enough (look at something like a PA-28 or Cessna 172 for size comparison) and, you know, actually works, then I will allow it
@TrislandianAlliance
I would probably say no, as the Beechcraft Super King Air (King Air 350) is probably the largest aircraft you can find in the General Aviation catagory
@Hedero
Just look it up. But they are typically 2 or 4 seat, single or twin engine light aircraft. Also probably the largest aircraft that can really count in this category is the Beechcraft KingAir 350
I have no words, this is the MOST REALISISTIC Cessna 172 I'VE EVER SEEN. And this is SimplePlanes too, making it even more impressive. I tip my hat to you, good sir and everyone else who helped you :3
@davis8634
Very good job, this is really detailed.
One thing I will say though, is that it looks more like a turbo-jet engine due to it's length and that it has a visible orang exhaust flame sort of like an afterburner.
But still, good job :3
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
Ok, but seriously, I'm not thinking of it being something that can exceed mach 1.
@FranzPeterSiegfried
Dude, I said February 8th, if you want an extension, then just say so
@TrislandianAlliance
@MrSilverWolf
@Zippy6
@Zippy6
did so
I think I might take part, somehow..
+1JUST IN CASE: There is a size restriction.
-
The length of your entry must not exeed 45 Feet.-
The wingspan must also not exeed 58 Feet.This is so your entry stays realistic for the GA category in terms of size. Also, I'm actually being quite generous in terms of the size restrictions
Interesting, but if you can make it a little smaller, mainly in the length, then that would be great. I just forgot to add a size restriction to the rules
@DerekSP
Ok, I will change that
Nice, but I think the wingspan is too big. I can just count the length, but the wingspan is too big. I will allow at max, a wingspan of 58 ft
@Bradford
Neato, good luck
@asteroidbook345
LOL
(your last one was good)
@TakicraftCorporation
Well, as long as it's small enough (look at something like a PA-28 or Cessna 172 for size comparison) and, you know, actually works, then I will allow it
@Numbers
Ok, rodger that, just try your best and find a way of getting it to me :3
@F4f879
@BnanaX
Well, the length of it is just over 49 ft. I know that that is to long for general aviation
@TrislandianAlliance
ok, but why is the deadline time outrageous?
@BnanaX
no, it's too long for one thing
@Sm10684
@Sm10684
I will tab you in it
@TrislandianAlliance
I would probably say no, as the Beechcraft Super King Air (King Air 350) is probably the largest aircraft you can find in the General Aviation catagory
@TrislandianAlliance
@Numbers
@Noname918181
your welcome :3
@BuiltBionixInd10
No idea, but I will need to decide if such a thing will actually be allowed in my book
@Hedero
Just look it up. But they are typically 2 or 4 seat, single or twin engine light aircraft. Also probably the largest aircraft that can really count in this category is the Beechcraft KingAir 350
@Mustang51
+11250.
I will change it XD
This looks quite nice :3
I think that the details are really good.
Well Done
@BuiltBionixInd10
@Mustang51
@Noname918181
@DerekSP
@MrPorg137
@Zippy6
Do you mind if I use this for a thumb nail?
@Mustang51
+1You will see...
Also, I will tag you on these things :3
@Mustang51
I'm also going to make another challenge, so look out for that
@Mustang51
Then I want to make a General Aviation, personal transport (single seat) aircraft that has a single jet engine
@Mustang51
I currently have a 3-engined (my first one) bomber with a rotary bomb bay and rocket boosters. It will be called: 'The Silver Phantom'
@Mustang51
+2Same here XD
@davis8634
That's the spirit :3
@Mustang51
Ends tomorrow, huh?
out of 10, what would you rate the successfulness of this challenge?
@MrSilverWolf
+1I want to use this because I'm making another challenge and this will be perfect for the thumbnail
I have no words, this is the MOST REALISISTIC Cessna 172 I'VE EVER SEEN. And this is SimplePlanes too, making it even more impressive. I tip my hat to you, good sir and everyone else who helped you :3
+2@BoganBoganTheMan
ohhhh...
@BoganBoganTheMan
What you mean by that?
@davis8634
Very good job, this is really detailed.
One thing I will say though, is that it looks more like a turbo-jet engine due to it's length and that it has a visible orang exhaust flame sort of like an afterburner.
But still, good job :3
@MrSilverWolf
Hey, do you mind if I use this for a thumbnail?
I will tag you
@Mustang51
hmm.. thanks anyways
@Mustang51
Do you know anyone that has any sort of experience in making mods?
@Gestour
@EternalDarkness
@mikoyanster
@Fartspoppop
I don't know if you know this or not, but to tag someone on a post, you need to say '@name' in a comment for it to be a tag
@Alta2809
+1Do you think you could upload the plane as unlisted and tag me?
@Mustang51
it ends in 2021 If you want to be REAL specific :3