@MaliciousMuffin
Ok, yes, it did fly up to 60,000 feet, but that was the late 20th and early 21st century. So who knows, maybe redoing Concorde in this day and age, or the future, could allow it to fly higher.
@WarHawk95
I'm more talking about its fuel consumption problem. The amount of fuel it burned just taxing to the runway is so ridiculous. And we also have far better technology now than we did when the Concorde was designed. So I'm more talking about improving the design.
It's quite difficult to make a good decision on this.
Concorde makes the most logical sense (to me at least) in passenger capacity in comparison to the 747 and especially the A380 as you are more likely to sell the most seats at a time, but it consumes wayyy more fuel than the other two.
.
The 747 does also have the advantage of being able to be used as a freighter, but as an airliner, it can have the trouble of not selling a lot of seats.
.
The A380 just has issues. It's too big for a lot of airports and also has the same issue of selling a lot of seats, having about 500 in total. It also can't be used as a freighter.
.
Tbh, with a big rework of the design, I would probably go with Concorde.
Nice trailer, but just a couple of criticisms (constructive).
First, I think you should try doing other shots, like ones of it on the ground for example, as that can add a bit of variety as this trailer got a bit repetitive.
Second, it isn't really recommended for a trailer to go on longer than about 2 minutes at most, otherwise it starts to drag. Essentially, the video length should just be a bit shorter
.
I'm not a film expert or anything and you don't have to listen to me, I'm just recommending these two tips to you.
Basically, you can use a Discord Server, or a working Image hosting site (I use Discord). You post your image on the Discord server or image hosting website, copy the link, then put the link into this which goes in the description: 
@SupremeDorian
Your 'C' point. Is SP actually too difficult to update right now? Like, is it just the way the game is made that makes it difficult to update, or some other reason?
@WIZARD2017
This should work: Click me
Kennneth is the creator and apparently had to remove it for a bit due to some bugs. Reposted it here though, Space should turn on/off the rain I believe.
I have a similar problem with my game that, without warning, just shows up an error message with a loading bar, that when said bar fills, the game closes.
This mostly happens in the Designer, however. I don't have any memory of it happening outside the designer.
It's impossible now in the usual way as modding support was removed from android.
I believe you can only use source code for Android, but I use a Laptop, so I don't know how to use that.
@Mostly
I'm assuming that goes in the Prop engine input?
(I already have an FT code in there for it to activate with an AG and spool up to certain amount.)
I would say that something you should try and improve on is your aerofoils. Your wings are made out of fuselage blocks, but they are typically only made out of one block. Looking at your builds, I believe you are capable of doing these more proper looking aerofoils, the ones made up of multiple fuselage blocks and with a proper aerofoil shape, which also have better custom control surfaces.
Of course, this is up to you and you don't have to listen to me, I'm just making a suggestion.
So I'm not judging this challenge, which to be honest you should really be doing yourself, before you say it's closed which is how every challenge is judged.
@Kipo
Oh for the love of God, the deadline is March 1st. Currently, as of writing this comment, it's February 28th, so I'm not judging your challenge yet.
Ok, this is like, making you one of the mod makers who are basically God-like mod makers in the SP community (My own opinion FYI).
@Mustang51
I'm doing fine.
@MaliciousMuffin
Ok, yes, it did fly up to 60,000 feet, but that was the late 20th and early 21st century. So who knows, maybe redoing Concorde in this day and age, or the future, could allow it to fly higher.
@ChrisPy
1st: Which Military?
2nd: Militaries are always working on something.
@ChrisPy
You can't really change the volume level of a Sonic boom...
Maybe it's a problem that could be solved by being able to fly higher.
@WarHawk95
I'm more talking about its fuel consumption problem. The amount of fuel it burned just taxing to the runway is so ridiculous. And we also have far better technology now than we did when the Concorde was designed. So I'm more talking about improving the design.
@Dazare
That's what I said...
It's quite difficult to make a good decision on this.
+2Concorde makes the most logical sense (to me at least) in passenger capacity in comparison to the 747 and especially the A380 as you are more likely to sell the most seats at a time, but it consumes wayyy more fuel than the other two.
.
The 747 does also have the advantage of being able to be used as a freighter, but as an airliner, it can have the trouble of not selling a lot of seats.
.
The A380 just has issues. It's too big for a lot of airports and also has the same issue of selling a lot of seats, having about 500 in total. It also can't be used as a freighter.
.
Tbh, with a big rework of the design, I would probably go with Concorde.
@ledownloader123
I mean...debatable...but whatever you say.
Your post doesn't make a lot of sense, can you try and rephrase it?
@AWESOMENESS360
Yes, maybe, but the point still stands.
This is amazing, straight up.
+2Nice trailer, but just a couple of criticisms (constructive).
First, I think you should try doing other shots, like ones of it on the ground for example, as that can add a bit of variety as this trailer got a bit repetitive.
Second, it isn't really recommended for a trailer to go on longer than about 2 minutes at most, otherwise it starts to drag. Essentially, the video length should just be a bit shorter
.
I'm not a film expert or anything and you don't have to listen to me, I'm just recommending these two tips to you.
@ledownloader123
I don't see why...
Dunno why, but this is also giving me 'Chitty Chitty Bang Bang' vibes.
+1Good build however.
Also, why are you asking the Devs?
Wow, I have no idea what you did for the thumbnail, but it really makes it look real.
Basically, you can use a Discord Server, or a working Image hosting site (I use Discord). You post your image on the Discord server or image hosting website, copy the link, then put the link into this which goes in the description:
@MIAW26PERSIAN
It's not like you have to use a Blueprint for the landing gear...
Not to be a naysayer or anything, but I have to point out that the landing gear is proportionally too small in comparison to the airframe.
@SupremeDorian
Well that makes sense.
@asteroidbook345
Ok, I solved the issue.
@SupremeDorian
Your 'C' point. Is SP actually too difficult to update right now? Like, is it just the way the game is made that makes it difficult to update, or some other reason?
What's the position of the rotator/hinge rotator?
@LoafOfBread
Heh, cool. When good old blighty gets Swedish aircraft.
Are there really RAF roundels on this?
+1@AmaeroLLC
Yeah....
Probably best you don't finish that sentence :\
@AmaeroLLC
Also, can't be a cheap "cash grab" if there is no 'cash' to be 'grabbed'.
This makes
Zerosense.@WIZARD2017
This should work: Click me
Kennneth is the creator and apparently had to remove it for a bit due to some bugs. Reposted it here though, Space should turn on/off the rain I believe.
You know a Mod section on this website exists...right...?
@SCP1471
I don't see how it's impossible as we already have a working Rain mod.
@EternalDarkness
Yeah, that doesn't really work either.
I have a similar problem with my game that, without warning, just shows up an error message with a loading bar, that when said bar fills, the game closes.
This mostly happens in the Designer, however. I don't have any memory of it happening outside the designer.
@Fox00One
+1Actually, saying that, it's only 119 parts, so it doesn't even count.
@Fox00One
+1Well, sorry about that.
It's impossible now in the usual way as modding support was removed from android.
+2I believe you can only use source code for Android, but I use a Laptop, so I don't know how to use that.
@Mostly
Ok, well I'll give it a try.
@Mostly
I'm assuming that goes in the Prop engine input?
(I already have an FT code in there for it to activate with an AG and spool up to certain amount.)
@Uchanka
Wing parts or fuselage wings?
@Boelin
Uh, no.
I decreased the drag, and that didn't do much.
I can't just remove it outright either or that wouldn't be realistic.
@MassiveSimurgh
Lol, your comment just made me realise we can make our own ground targets :p
@PapaKernels
It really hasn't, I'm talking about the wings if you don't know what I'm talking about.
I would say that something you should try and improve on is your aerofoils. Your wings are made out of fuselage blocks, but they are typically only made out of one block. Looking at your builds, I believe you are capable of doing these more proper looking aerofoils, the ones made up of multiple fuselage blocks and with a proper aerofoil shape, which also have better custom control surfaces.
Of course, this is up to you and you don't have to listen to me, I'm just making a suggestion.
"Why do I hear Boss music?"
+1But instead, "Why do I hear freedom?"
@Mustang51
Hey, you doing ok?
@Kipo
Well if you want me to "compile a list for you", I need all the entries to be judged that have not been disqualified, if any.
@SyntheticL
Bruh, why did you have to copy my comment letter to letter?
So I'm not judging this challenge, which to be honest you should really be doing yourself, before you say it's closed which is how every challenge is judged.
@Kipo
Oh for the love of God, the deadline is March 1st. Currently, as of writing this comment, it's February 28th, so I'm not judging your challenge yet.