@Rub3n213 It is a good idea, and very thoughtful of you to carefully explain it in this post. As a spoiled PC user, I'd prefer they add new content to 1.8 (stuff like cannons, new fuselage block shapes, things that might bring people back into the game or let us build new things) but I can see how a lot of IOS users could benefit from your suggestions.
@RailfanEthan is right. What if Trump had read this? How many innocent people would've been killed before he realized the mistake and blamed it on Hillary Clinton?
@dcshoeco193 I like the early, black and white illustrations, though the recent IDW issues are brilliant as well. But I think you're referring to the films, which of course the Urban/Thirlby/Headey version is the obvious winner.
@8bitgamer33 I love the Wright flyer, but your claim that nobody would ever make airplanes had the Wrights not done so is ridiculous. That's like suggesting that if the first-place runner in a race hadn't shown up, that no one else would have run. The future is unwritten, and that's how it was for the people of the past as well. Had the Wrights not flown at Kittyhawk, there were plenty of others taking to the sky around that time.
As a matter of fact, the Wright brothers damaged American aviation by ruthlessly suing anyone else who tried to build airplanes in the USA. For a decade the States lagged behind European countries because the monopoly the Wright brothers held.
@HistoricBirds Originally built during WW2 as an A-26B, the Invader was redesignated B-26B in 1948 (around the same time as the Airforce split from the Army). All solid-nosed Invaders are B models, all glass-nosed Invaders are C models. This is how the aircraft would've looked in 1953.
If you stretch certain fuselage blocks too far in certain ways it messes up the way the game processes shadows. The result is a strangely reflective surface that can look a bit translucent, but not in a good way.
@jamesPLANESii Planesii, is that Greek? It sounds Greek. Anyway, the way it was explained to me was that you can increase the size of the bomb, which increases the size of the visual explosion, but there was no way to effect the damage of a bomb. Obviously I heard that on these forums, and I could be wrong... but anyway.
Yes, with fine tuner mod. But only do it with all three dimensions equally. If you try to stretch just one direction, you will experience hilarious disaster.
I find that I do a better job on planes I really, really like. Find one that really grabs your attention, maybe it'll inspire you to go all out for it.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck Right. But the A-26 was real, and people really used it in combat for almost half a century. Few aircraft could match it for counter-insurgency operations until the AC gunships were developed.
@AircraftoftheRedStar Same here. I try to make my planes realistic up to a point, but there are a lot of cool planes that never saw mass production for very good reasons.
@AircraftoftheRedStar As long as you keep the blue behind the red, you'll be good to go. That's one of the nice things about Simple Planes, sometimes you can make them fly better than the real thing. :)
@AircraftoftheRedStar Maybe, but for high caliber, slow firing guns you're going to want stability. With forward swept wings you'd have problems at trans sonic speeds, but more importantly you'd have an inherantly unstable plane. You'd be lucky to get it to fly at all without computer assistence, much less line up a shot effectively.
IOS is the devil. It doesn't support mods. If you've heard otherwise, go ask the people you heard it from. I know it's frustrating, but we can't help you. Blame Apple.
Because that's not how aircraft work. In real life, the yaw controls are used sparingly and in conjunction with the roll controls. To understand the why's and how's of this, you're going to have to read a bit about aerodynamics. I recommend wikipedia.
@Spitfirelad05 Start off with something simple but effective, like the North American F-100 or the Shenyang J-8II (the pointy nose version).
@Squirrel Like this? lol
@Rub3n213 Well... there's only a few devs. Five I think. And they have the other game to work on as well.
@Rub3n213 It is a good idea, and very thoughtful of you to carefully explain it in this post. As a spoiled PC user, I'd prefer they add new content to 1.8 (stuff like cannons, new fuselage block shapes, things that might bring people back into the game or let us build new things) but I can see how a lot of IOS users could benefit from your suggestions.
+2@Gameboy21 Educate yourself.
Nothing official but there is one that's very active
@CptJacobson You only added it after two people reminded you. You're lucky we care so much.
@JelloAircraftCorporation Fret not, comrade. Also, nice plane you got there on the front page.
More like dank times! Yololololol
@CptJacobson Happy? No. You were lucky this time. Meditate on your mistake, be grateful no one was hurt and never do this again.
+1Don't set mass to zero, that causes bugs. Instead, try multiplying it by .01
@CptJacobson
@RailfanEthan is right. What if Trump had read this? How many innocent people would've been killed before he realized the mistake and blamed it on Hillary Clinton?
USE THE ROLEPLAY TAG
+3Some good ideas here.
+1JAMES PLANES NUMBER 2 IS NUMBER ONE!
+2Facebook sucks, don't do it!
@RailfanEthan Hey! I'm from Snowstone.
+3Snowstone Ice Base
+3@dcshoeco193 I like the early, black and white illustrations, though the recent IDW issues are brilliant as well. But I think you're referring to the films, which of course the Urban/Thirlby/Headey version is the obvious winner.
@8bitgamer33 I love the Wright flyer, but your claim that nobody would ever make airplanes had the Wrights not done so is ridiculous. That's like suggesting that if the first-place runner in a race hadn't shown up, that no one else would have run. The future is unwritten, and that's how it was for the people of the past as well. Had the Wrights not flown at Kittyhawk, there were plenty of others taking to the sky around that time.
As a matter of fact, the Wright brothers damaged American aviation by ruthlessly suing anyone else who tried to build airplanes in the USA. For a decade the States lagged behind European countries because the monopoly the Wright brothers held.
+3@HistoricBirds Originally built during WW2 as an A-26B, the Invader was redesignated B-26B in 1948 (around the same time as the Airforce split from the Army). All solid-nosed Invaders are B models, all glass-nosed Invaders are C models. This is how the aircraft would've looked in 1953.
If you stretch certain fuselage blocks too far in certain ways it messes up the way the game processes shadows. The result is a strangely reflective surface that can look a bit translucent, but not in a good way.
@jamesPLANESii Not James-PLANES!-eeee?
@jamesPLANESii Planesii, is that Greek? It sounds Greek. Anyway, the way it was explained to me was that you can increase the size of the bomb, which increases the size of the visual explosion, but there was no way to effect the damage of a bomb. Obviously I heard that on these forums, and I could be wrong... but anyway.
Does this mean you won't be making any more forum posts today?
+1PEACE
Not piece.
+1@HistoricBirds You can page up to three people at a time. Good luck with your meet up.
Yes, with fine tuner mod. But only do it with all three dimensions equally. If you try to stretch just one direction, you will experience hilarious disaster.
+1Use the search tool.
There are hundreds of them on here.
Few planes were smaller than the Yakovlev Yak-3. Her pilots liked to call her the "Little Beauty"
+1I find that I do a better job on planes I really, really like. Find one that really grabs your attention, maybe it'll inspire you to go all out for it.
@Boundslayer Thanks!
Looking good
It's not tomorrow yet, kiwi.
+3I'd rather the 4 or 5 people behind this game spend their time on new features.
+2Go to google and look up "SimplePlanes Auto roll"
This is a common peoblem with a small vaeiety of causes that have been exhaustively covered. If you've got any more questions after that, lemme know.
+1"@ThePilotDude will complete building in 4 or 5 days"
Not if Snake has anything to say about it!
+1@Marine
I thought they had a 12 year timer that restarts whenever anyone posts questions like this in the forms. Was that just a rumor?
@jamesPLANESii
+1@GeneralOliverVonBismarck Right. But the A-26 was real, and people really used it in combat for almost half a century. Few aircraft could match it for counter-insurgency operations until the AC gunships were developed.
AWESOME! SEE YA!
@AircraftoftheRedStar Same here. I try to make my planes realistic up to a point, but there are a lot of cool planes that never saw mass production for very good reasons.
3/5 Stars
Not to scale but looks great. Would dig with bare hands immediately after spawning again.
OH YEAH BABY!
@AircraftoftheRedStar As long as you keep the blue behind the red, you'll be good to go. That's one of the nice things about Simple Planes, sometimes you can make them fly better than the real thing. :)
@RailfanEthan :(
@AircraftoftheRedStar Maybe, but for high caliber, slow firing guns you're going to want stability. With forward swept wings you'd have problems at trans sonic speeds, but more importantly you'd have an inherantly unstable plane. You'd be lucky to get it to fly at all without computer assistence, much less line up a shot effectively.
The wings are backwards.
+1Did somebody say 50 Cals? This one's packing 14 of them.
+1You gonna make an El Camino to chase it around?
+1IOS is the devil. It doesn't support mods. If you've heard otherwise, go ask the people you heard it from. I know it's frustrating, but we can't help you. Blame Apple.
+1Because that's not how aircraft work. In real life, the yaw controls are used sparingly and in conjunction with the roll controls. To understand the why's and how's of this, you're going to have to read a bit about aerodynamics. I recommend wikipedia.
+1