Ok, you got my permission to use that little engine. I'm too busy to edit it for you, but hopefully someone else will. If not, simply don't use full throttle.
@Benny3053 I'm on Android too. It's not that hard to xml, you just have to write in the right thing. If you make a mistake, you can't open the editor. Just make sure you don't change anything except putting - in front of the number.
@Mr_6371 if you find a comparison picture, you will notice that the wings are almost exactly the same, the tail is just smoother version of Il76's tail, they are almost exactly the same size (I'm not sure about that one, they look the same size in the picture I stumbled upon, I only compared them visually), and so on. I don't doubt that it's a significant improvement, but those two planes look too much alike for it to be a coincidence. Greatest visible difference is the nose, that was completely redesigned, landing gear having smaller number of bigger wheels, and most of the rough Soviet lines being smoothed.
@JeffreyD2015 add more stuff, or better yet, make a new, better/different one. Re-uploading with such a small fix ain't worth it. Guys who download it can fix it themselves in a few seconds.
To prevent spinning out (doing doughnuts), try putting vertical stabilizer on the stern. For some reason, physics is the same for both planes and boats, so keep CoM in front of the CoL.
@Cerdon it wasn't always like that. That was introduced when users started making alternative accounts to upvote their own builds. Nowadays, you can't upvote until you build a model good enough to get upvotes.
Welcome to the community. Now you should have more than enough points to upvote stuff. Be nice to other users. If you need any advice, feel free to ask. Enjoy.
@Cerdon so far noone has made a version with planes, as far as I know.
To get points, you need to get upvotes. Every upvote is worth 15 points on builds and 2 points on forum posts. You need 30 points to upvote stuff. That means two upvotes.
Looks like a real thing. I will take MoterKade's word about its handling, since I currently don't have the time to test it. Tag me on its final version please, I'll be looking forward to it.
@Razr depends on the situation. Big rotator is, in my opinion, obsolete. Small rotator (and the old, big one) simulate the rotating part being placed on an axel. Hinge rotator simulates joint or a hinge.
That simply means that you have to upgrade your basic technique or start making something more interesting. Keep in mind, both looks and performance are important. Good basic design plus details is a winning combination.
If you want to embed a link (make a clickable link) write it like this: [text that you want to be seen] (link), with no space in between.
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you being a Bosnian nationalist is enough for me to end this conversation now. Please remove your comments from my post. Just to be clear, I do have friends in Bosnia. I do not support anybody's nationalism. Go away.
No problem. Since Latent suggested it, I'll try to leave a comment with every upvote describing why I upvoted. I suggest you, and everyone, do the same.
It looks so cool. Unfortunately, I don't have time to flight test it now, but - Note to self: cream on green looks great.
Just one thing I noticed: with a 53mm auto-canon, it's more of a ground attack plane than fighter. That's one big gun.
Ok, you got my permission to use that little engine. I'm too busy to edit it for you, but hopefully someone else will. If not, simply don't use full throttle.
@Benny3053 I'm on Android too. It's not that hard to xml, you just have to write in the right thing. If you make a mistake, you can't open the editor. Just make sure you don't change anything except putting - in front of the number.
@Mr_6371 if you find a comparison picture, you will notice that the wings are almost exactly the same, the tail is just smoother version of Il76's tail, they are almost exactly the same size (I'm not sure about that one, they look the same size in the picture I stumbled upon, I only compared them visually), and so on. I don't doubt that it's a significant improvement, but those two planes look too much alike for it to be a coincidence. Greatest visible difference is the nose, that was completely redesigned, landing gear having smaller number of bigger wheels, and most of the rough Soviet lines being smoothed.
Benny, there's no glass yet. You can xml it to have negative length (or width/hight) to make it see-through from the outside.
Welcome back. Have an upvote.
Nice. Great job, buddy
I'm glad to hear that there are more guys who like ultralights, @KnightOfAraluen.
Well, that certainly is more rounded. Now work on the details.
@ChasingHorizon you mostly have those. My destroyers will take care of what little rest you have.
@TheInvisible thank you, buddy
@ChasingHorizon spare it from what? Ww2 naval AA guns would struggle to hit even this one =)
@JeffreyD2015 add more stuff, or better yet, make a new, better/different one. Re-uploading with such a small fix ain't worth it. Guys who download it can fix it themselves in a few seconds.
Woah, cool car, dude. My only complaint is that the wheels are shiny.
Thanks @Benny3053
Aww, it's a chubby one =) I love it.
@Woodenking1983 thanks buddy. I'm glad you like it.
@Cedy117 @ForeverPie thanks guys
@General360 thanks
@JTM55 really? How?
@JTM55 yey, somebody likes it 😀. Thanks buddy
Great job, @Noman0rumeral. I'm impressed.
@Benny3053 no problem. Why don't you make your next plane a bit rounder? Someone might get cut on those corners.
To prevent spinning out (doing doughnuts), try putting vertical stabilizer on the stern. For some reason, physics is the same for both planes and boats, so keep CoM in front of the CoL.
@Cerdon it wasn't always like that. That was introduced when users started making alternative accounts to upvote their own builds. Nowadays, you can't upvote until you build a model good enough to get upvotes.
@GriffithAir I know, buddy. Thanks for notifying me anyway.
Welcome to the community. Now you should have more than enough points to upvote stuff. Be nice to other users. If you need any advice, feel free to ask. Enjoy.
@Cerdon so far noone has made a version with planes, as far as I know.
To get points, you need to get upvotes. Every upvote is worth 15 points on builds and 2 points on forum posts. You need 30 points to upvote stuff. That means two upvotes.
Great. Now put some skin on these bones.
Ugh, the hammer explodes first...
@Benny3053 no problem.
Good job, buddy. This plane looks great and flies really well. @Cedy117, a feature?
Looks like a real thing. I will take MoterKade's word about its handling, since I currently don't have the time to test it. Tag me on its final version please, I'll be looking forward to it.
No. That leads to real price system, which leads to "pay to win". Your suggestion is nice, but it would eventually have bad consequences.
@Johndfg no problem
@Razr depends on the situation. Big rotator is, in my opinion, obsolete. Small rotator (and the old, big one) simulate the rotating part being placed on an axel. Hinge rotator simulates joint or a hinge.
Nice work. Looks great.
Oh, it's a Chinese Ilyushin Il-76 ripoff. Yous is definitely better.
Cool. I love this tank so much that I have a model of it in my room. Thanks for making it.
It looks really cool. Keep up the good work.
@Benny3053 no problem
I wish you all the luck with that. I'll be looking forward to your ships.
@DanAviation no problem, buddy.
That simply means that you have to upgrade your basic technique or start making something more interesting. Keep in mind, both looks and performance are important. Good basic design plus details is a winning combination.
If you want to embed a link (make a clickable link) write it like this: [text that you want to be seen] (link), with no space in between.
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you being a Bosnian nationalist is enough for me to end this conversation now. Please remove your comments from my post. Just to be clear, I do have friends in Bosnia. I do not support anybody's nationalism. Go away.
Great work. I love detailed builds. It really looks realistic.
@Othawne no problem, m8
@Othawne oh. Ok. It's a lovely plane anyway.
No problem. Since Latent suggested it, I'll try to leave a comment with every upvote describing why I upvoted. I suggest you, and everyone, do the same.
It looks so cool. Unfortunately, I don't have time to flight test it now, but - Note to self: cream on green looks great.
Just one thing I noticed: with a 53mm auto-canon, it's more of a ground attack plane than fighter. That's one big gun.
Hey, it's one of them ships! I like those =3