@General360 as for you being added to the group, unfortunately, I don't see that happening in near future. This is the same Hangouts group chat you were a part of before you left, and there were arguments. Many old users from there still hold a grudge, and would vote against adding you. If it was up to me alone, I would wait and see what you can do with your newly-gained xml abilities, and help you refine them, since I suppose you are new to that, and then I would add you.
Also, I see you are done with your depression. A week of being back, and you still haven't caused any drama. I'm very glad to see that.
@MrDoolittle how much time do you spend per build? Most of su from Masters often spend more than a week on a single build, building for a few hours every day. It's dedication that we are looking for, and that is seen in one's posts. For example, Cedy117 used to be an iOS builder, but his builds from that period are better than most builds made on PC. That level of skill and dedication got him on the chat. Are we better builders than you? We are a group of people who spend whole lot of time trying our best to be good at this. I even invested into a laptop just so I can overcome limitations of my phone. I'm generally not using it for anything else. That's how much we give ourselves to this game.
@Weaverfish both. Example of a low part count builder who I've been following from the start is Luciozanazzi. He makes light aircraft with realistic looks, amazing handling, and low part count.
@Viper28 we all start with bad. @Dllama4 is maintaining a constant good quality for a while now, and has caught my eye, and maybe of some other users on the chat. That's how adding people works. I scrolled through some of his posts, and he's good enough in my opinion. But, well, this happened.
@KDS I understand that. But that's not what other users from "Underlings" were saying. JAWC is in to cause drama, and others were in for our reputation.
On another account, @Dllama4, this has turned out very unfortunate. You are getting good, and made it on my "to suggest for voting" list. Chances are, you were a month from being added.
@KDS I am pretty much getting a live photo stream from your group as I'm typing this. You made a group out of people who know and appreciate me. As for groups, I don't have a problem with groups forming, as long as they are decent, friendly, and not hostile towards us. Make your own, and stay away from ours please.
@helilover03 really? That's nice. Maybe you can add me there, if it's on Hangouts. If some of the guys wanna learn tricks, I have quite a few of those tho show.
@JakeTheDogg maybe. Why don't you also make a suggestion, with a few other models? These are the ones that I thought suit the purpose the best. Brahmos is nice, but these three are icons.
@helilover03 you could do it. You do have some potential. Try, and try hard, to replicate shapes from real planes, even when building fictional ones. That's the key. Also, do understand that we invest days, sometimes weeks into every build. Quality isn't easy. I hope you'll go down that path.
@Solarisaircraft all it lacks are windows and a mast for radar and antennas. You can make that on iOS. Takes a bit of time and skill, but it can be done
@Weaverfish that, and also ease the work for the rest of us. If I make a 1300 part ship that already lags my laptop, I don't want to spend 35x4 on torpedoes, that would also take up four activation groups. I have created both torpedoes and cruise missiles before, but I have never used them on my builds due to them requiring AGs to be operated, and me leaving the plane to guide them, during which time the plane often drifts off course.
@RedstoneAeroAviation yes. Given that I have reached Platinum in three months and two days, that was probably around a three weeks after I made my account.
@Weaverfish yes, while flying a plane. These missiles are radar- or inertially-guided. Also, that would allow for only seven missiles, given that I don't use activation groups for other things
@RedstoneAeroAviation not counting constant conversations on the subject of building on SP Masters, I only did a few times, long time ago. I can't remember how long exactly, or how many points I had, nor who answered. I remember that I needed some help with ship steering and stability when I was making my first ship. I think I was barely silver at the time.
@Dllama4 it was over a year ago. Masters chat still wasn't the Masters chat. It was a bunch of folks who play SP. I found a way to make small prop engine work under water, and that caught an eye of the guys on the chat. We started talking, and they decided to add me there due to easier communication on Hangouts. It was @AeroEngineering who added me.
@Shmexysmpilot a little of both. I was making stuff for fun, and then I saw I'm becoming popular here. Then I decided I'm here to stay, improved my technique a lot, and adjusted my upload times to when more users are active, so more people would see my builds. I still build for my own pleasure, but popularity I'm getting is really nice too. Basically, popularity i what keeps me building, and the joy of building is what keeps me improving.
@EpicPigster1 no problem buddy. If I don't forget, I'll show you a technique I found while improvising, that gives good-looking custom control surfaces.
@Ctracerx2
1: No;
2: ...;
3: Yes, CT. You have beautiful eyes XD;
4: Because you have nothing better to be doing right now, or you are procrastinating;
5: I just told you.
@Ian1231100 sorry, haven't seen part 2 of your question. There are no rules for that. I will often make a build in a few hours, and then tweak it for a week, or invest better part of the month into a ship.
@General360 as for you being added to the group, unfortunately, I don't see that happening in near future. This is the same Hangouts group chat you were a part of before you left, and there were arguments. Many old users from there still hold a grudge, and would vote against adding you. If it was up to me alone, I would wait and see what you can do with your newly-gained xml abilities, and help you refine them, since I suppose you are new to that, and then I would add you.
Also, I see you are done with your depression. A week of being back, and you still haven't caused any drama. I'm very glad to see that.
@General360 that's fine by me. I remember we did have a few arguments, but that was long ago. Welcome back and enjoy your stay :)
@MrDoolittle how much time do you spend per build? Most of su from Masters often spend more than a week on a single build, building for a few hours every day. It's dedication that we are looking for, and that is seen in one's posts. For example, Cedy117 used to be an iOS builder, but his builds from that period are better than most builds made on PC. That level of skill and dedication got him on the chat. Are we better builders than you? We are a group of people who spend whole lot of time trying our best to be good at this. I even invested into a laptop just so I can overcome limitations of my phone. I'm generally not using it for anything else. That's how much we give ourselves to this game.
@Weaverfish both. Example of a low part count builder who I've been following from the start is Luciozanazzi. He makes light aircraft with realistic looks, amazing handling, and low part count.
@General360 welcome back. It's been a while, huh?
@Shmexysmpilot by scaling the cockpit to be shorter
@Viper28 we all start with bad. @Dllama4 is maintaining a constant good quality for a while now, and has caught my eye, and maybe of some other users on the chat. That's how adding people works. I scrolled through some of his posts, and he's good enough in my opinion. But, well, this happened.
@KDS I understand that. But that's not what other users from "Underlings" were saying. JAWC is in to cause drama, and others were in for our reputation.
On another account, @Dllama4, this has turned out very unfortunate. You are getting good, and made it on my "to suggest for voting" list. Chances are, you were a month from being added.
@MrDoolittle don't be disrespectful please.
@helilover03 please stay out. I appreciate your help, but we can solve this ourselves. No need for you to get in potential trouble.
@MrDoolittle look a bit down
@KDS just to assure you that I'm telling the truth
@KDS I am pretty much getting a live photo stream from your group as I'm typing this. You made a group out of people who know and appreciate me. As for groups, I don't have a problem with groups forming, as long as they are decent, friendly, and not hostile towards us. Make your own, and stay away from ours please.
@helilover03 really? That's nice. Maybe you can add me there, if it's on Hangouts. If some of the guys wanna learn tricks, I have quite a few of those tho show.
@helilover03 can't wait to see that buddy.
@JakeTheDogg maybe. Why don't you also make a suggestion, with a few other models? These are the ones that I thought suit the purpose the best. Brahmos is nice, but these three are icons.
@helilover03 nothing wrong in having fun. This is a game after all. Enjoy it your way by all means.
@helilover03 I can't. Everybody's skill is different. I can't assess if you are rushing them, or not having ideas to build realistic.
@helilover03 no problem buddy.
@helilover03 you could do it. You do have some potential. Try, and try hard, to replicate shapes from real planes, even when building fictional ones. That's the key. Also, do understand that we invest days, sometimes weeks into every build. Quality isn't easy. I hope you'll go down that path.
@Solarisaircraft all it lacks are windows and a mast for radar and antennas. You can make that on iOS. Takes a bit of time and skill, but it can be done
You forgot to mention jump zone :)
@Tully2001 eh, in a way that they should have more details, I guess
@Tully2001 some of the guys voted against you, unfortunately. They think that your builds should be far more detailed.
@KerlonceauxIndustries yes, Exocet is French for flying fish
@KerlonceauxIndustries thank you
Did you read description of the mod? It explains how to host a server.
@Weaverfish that, and also ease the work for the rest of us. If I make a 1300 part ship that already lags my laptop, I don't want to spend 35x4 on torpedoes, that would also take up four activation groups. I have created both torpedoes and cruise missiles before, but I have never used them on my builds due to them requiring AGs to be operated, and me leaving the plane to guide them, during which time the plane often drifts off course.
@RedstoneAeroAviation yes. Given that I have reached Platinum in three months and two days, that was probably around a three weeks after I made my account.
@Weaverfish yes, while flying a plane. These missiles are radar- or inertially-guided. Also, that would allow for only seven missiles, given that I don't use activation groups for other things
@Weaverfish eh, being realistic? Some of us want that. A large bomber doesn't dive upon a ship, it launches a missile from 100 miles away.
@arcues not a post about those, buddy. Torpedos will be back when their bugs are fixed and a model for them made. Might be soon.
@TAplanes not personally. I saw it going down. I was four years old at the time.
@RedstoneAeroAviation not counting constant conversations on the subject of building on SP Masters, I only did a few times, long time ago. I can't remember how long exactly, or how many points I had, nor who answered. I remember that I needed some help with ship steering and stability when I was making my first ship. I think I was barely silver at the time.
I doubt devs discontinue this game. If they do, there's still mod makers that will continue the work.
@jamesPLANESii a sentence in an interrogative form, addressed to someone in order to get information in reply.
Looks very nice. A bit wobbly in flight with keyboard input, but "mouse as joystick" fixes that. To make it less wobbly, use slower pitch rotators.
@Dllama4 it was over a year ago. Masters chat still wasn't the Masters chat. It was a bunch of folks who play SP. I found a way to make small prop engine work under water, and that caught an eye of the guys on the chat. We started talking, and they decided to add me there due to easier communication on Hangouts. It was @AeroEngineering who added me.
@Shmexysmpilot a little of both. I was making stuff for fun, and then I saw I'm becoming popular here. Then I decided I'm here to stay, improved my technique a lot, and adjusted my upload times to when more users are active, so more people would see my builds. I still build for my own pleasure, but popularity I'm getting is really nice too. Basically, popularity i what keeps me building, and the joy of building is what keeps me improving.
@EpicPigster1 no problem buddy. If I don't forget, I'll show you a technique I found while improvising, that gives good-looking custom control surfaces.
@TheWeaver lol
@Ctracerx2
1: No;
2: ...;
3: Yes, CT. You have beautiful eyes XD;
4: Because you have nothing better to be doing right now, or you are procrastinating;
5: I just told you.
On Android, clearing your memory helps a lot, and so does removing unnecessary apps. I don't know if that work on iOS. Might be worth a shot.
@SAC923 Ford Focus Station Wagon 2007, my car
@Ian1231100 sorry, haven't seen part 2 of your question. There are no rules for that. I will often make a build in a few hours, and then tweak it for a week, or invest better part of the month into a ship.
@AdrianFlyingAce nope, doesn't work. Maybe you posted hidden/unlisted
@AdrianFlyingAce
@AdrianFlyingAce ugh, can't find it...
@Delphinus I don't know that. Sorry, can't help.
@AdrianFlyingAce the link is faulty. It takes me to "image doesn't exist" page