@JacksEpicGamingYT it's difficult not to know that something is rude. Usually, you would get a warning for the first minor offense, at least back when I was a moderator. For the current state of affairs, you would have to ask current moderators.
I like pre-dreadnoughts, and this build sort of captures the spirit of one.
You should try to, if not build a replica of a real pre-dreadnought, then at least work off a picture and try to get close.
Should you decide to do that, you can ask me for tips, or join PortSP, Discord server for exchanging shipbuilding techniques.
@IceCraftGaming it's heavy for what it is. Actually for what it was meant to be. The build it was made for was supposed to hold twelve of them, along with assorted smaller guns, and other things a protected cruiser should have. Over one thousand parts just for the main guns would be a bit excessive.
I'll sound a tad sour. The challenge post has one part too many, and asking for people to upvote the post is strictly against the rules, and a passing moderator may strike you for it.
On the other hand, this is a challenge much to my liking. Decently defined rules and requirements, and thumbnail is not a photoshopped picture, but a proper build representative of the challenge.
@CarMaker20 it's not worth it. You get to deal with a bunch of annoying users who hate your guts because you are enforcing the rules they have agreed to follow. I have received literal death threats when I was a moderator.
@CarMaker20 it comes with a temporary ban, duration of which depends on the severity of the offense. When this post was made, it wasn't so. A strike was a permanent note visible only to the moderators.
I am no longer a moderator though. Things might have changed these days.
I have finally tested it. It looks as good up close as it does in the screenshots. Suspension is quite stiff for this kind of vehicle though, and you should invest into FT engine inputs that allow both realistic acceleration and good hill climbing.
There are better ways to control an airship than a gyroscope. Mine (you can find it on my profile) uses differential vertical thrust for buoyancy and attitude control.
I like the design, though it could use some refinement. I believe future iterations will be even better. If you need any tips, feel free to ping me, or find me on Discord.
@fantasyucakistan this is a very old build. It could use a complete remake. Game's physics have been somewhat updated since this was built, and it wasn't a very good build to begin with.
I suggest joining PortSP Discord server if you are interested in learning more about building ships in Simple Planes. It's a dedicated shipbuilding server. Here's the invite link.
I would expect it to lift more (the most interesting trait of S-boot was that both bow and stern lifted while still cutting the water instead of planning on it), and more tolling in turns. It would be nice to see the spare torpedoes actually pushed in when reloading.
Other than that, very nice boat. Great details, fun to use, and accurate.
I didn't catch your reply on the previous post before it was removed. What was it?
By the way, you can put that cool picture you used there in description.
Thumbnail has to show the build as it is, not a picture of what it was supposed to look like. It's in the rules.
I advise removing this post and posting it again, before the moderators get here.
Nice build, by the way.
@Lerkov1991 it's an abandoned build. It was made over a year ago, and I don't want to update it to the current standard. You can play with it though. Here it is.
@JacksEpicGamingYT developers are above moderators. They have higher authority.
@JacksEpicGamingYT it's difficult not to know that something is rude. Usually, you would get a warning for the first minor offense, at least back when I was a moderator. For the current state of affairs, you would have to ask current moderators.
+1I like pre-dreadnoughts, and this build sort of captures the spirit of one.
+1You should try to, if not build a replica of a real pre-dreadnought, then at least work off a picture and try to get close.
Should you decide to do that, you can ask me for tips, or join PortSP, Discord server for exchanging shipbuilding techniques.
@Shootingstar07 Sure.
Sucks to see that the old problems still persist, though it only stands to reason. You're doing a great job keeping them in check, guys.
+3@WiiMini mentioning your server when context calls for it was always allowed. Quit bugging the new guy.
+7@IceCraftGaming it's heavy for what it is. Actually for what it was meant to be. The build it was made for was supposed to hold twelve of them, along with assorted smaller guns, and other things a protected cruiser should have. Over one thousand parts just for the main guns would be a bit excessive.
+1@Vincent, can you help out here?
@DeveloperKorzalerke There is a saying where I'm from. Roughly translated, goes "What a smart man is ashamed of, a fool is proud of".
It's a nice conversion. Appropriate for this chassis.
@DuskV yes. The engines themselves would be in a room next to the intakes, and would deliver power to the propellers via shafts.
I'll sound a tad sour. The challenge post has one part too many, and asking for people to upvote the post is strictly against the rules, and a passing moderator may strike you for it.
+5On the other hand, this is a challenge much to my liking. Decently defined rules and requirements, and thumbnail is not a photoshopped picture, but a proper build representative of the challenge.
@CarMaker20 I was a moderator.
@CarMaker20 it's not worth it. You get to deal with a bunch of annoying users who hate your guts because you are enforcing the rules they have agreed to follow. I have received literal death threats when I was a moderator.
@CarMaker20 it comes with a temporary ban, duration of which depends on the severity of the offense. When this post was made, it wasn't so. A strike was a permanent note visible only to the moderators.
I am no longer a moderator though. Things might have changed these days.
Quite impressive. It's not something that generally goes with my typical builds, but I'm sure it will be fun for messing around.
+4Oh, hi (:
@UmbrellaCorporation why delete your comments?
@UmbrellaCorporation I can contact him the same way you can: through the contact link in the footer of the page. Unless it is absolutely urgent.
@UmbrellaCorporation hardly. I haven't heard from the guy since I stopped being a moderator.
@UmbrellaCorporation hello.
@RomanoMilos oh, then it's great. I didn't know that.
+1I have finally tested it. It looks as good up close as it does in the screenshots. Suspension is quite stiff for this kind of vehicle though, and you should invest into FT engine inputs that allow both realistic acceleration and good hill climbing.
+2There are better ways to control an airship than a gyroscope. Mine (you can find it on my profile) uses differential vertical thrust for buoyancy and attitude control.
I like the design, though it could use some refinement. I believe future iterations will be even better. If you need any tips, feel free to ping me, or find me on Discord.
It looks amazing, especially for the part count. Hopefully I won't forget to test it when I'm free.
+3@fantasyucakistan this is a very old build. It could use a complete remake. Game's physics have been somewhat updated since this was built, and it wasn't a very good build to begin with.
+1@UrLocalGallade definitions of a corvette vary, though this ship indeed fits most of them. Its design is even based on an actual corvette.
+1You should have used a camera for pilot view, so I can keep it on the instrument panel while fiddling with buttons. Other than that, nice build.
+1Oh, hi Jasp. I haven't noticed it's you.
PS: I upvote what I like, regardless of who made it.
+1@KingOfTypos They are very nice indeed. I'm glad that you have found my technique useful.
+1I suggest joining PortSP Discord server if you are interested in learning more about building ships in Simple Planes. It's a dedicated shipbuilding server. Here's the invite link.
+1Very nice. It's rair to see a cruiser from the first word war on this site.
+1@Diloph there's both auto-credit and description credit.
@HuskyDynamics01 nice upgrade.
Strange puppy. Has a bit of an explosive temper.
+13@BgGaming it's some ancient background mod whose name I forgot. I don't have it anymore.
@ReinMcDeer no. RPČ-214 river patrol boat.
+1River patrol boat.
I would expect it to lift more (the most interesting trait of S-boot was that both bow and stern lifted while still cutting the water instead of planning on it), and more tolling in turns. It would be nice to see the spare torpedoes actually pushed in when reloading.
+1Other than that, very nice boat. Great details, fun to use, and accurate.
@jamesPLANESii indeed. It's not a beast, but it can run this build just fine.
+1I can finally play with your builds.
+1Very nice work, I really enjoyed it.
@WaitBreadIsntAfruit I used to be a mod. I'm not anymore.
@Vincent would you mind?
I didn't catch your reply on the previous post before it was removed. What was it?
By the way, you can put that cool picture you used there in description.
Thumbnail has to show the build as it is, not a picture of what it was supposed to look like. It's in the rules.
I advise removing this post and posting it again, before the moderators get here.
Nice build, by the way.
Credit for the original build would be greatly appreciated. As per the rules, you should give it.
+2I don't really mind, but others could.
Very nice ship.
+3Troll
+2Never skip the leg day.
+1@Lerkov1991 it's an abandoned build. It was made over a year ago, and I don't want to update it to the current standard. You can play with it though. Here it is.
+1I really like these kinds of builds. They are rare on the site. Thingies that are cool in real life, but can't really be used on SP.
+2You have missed the career, Andrew. You should have been an actor.
+19Very nice video, and the best April Fools so far.