Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Rickyjasper2 three of your comments have been removed. Please don't be rude. If you think user has done something wrong, politely explain that to them.
The build looks nice, but you should definitely consider using a better looking airfoil. Roll rate is far lower than I'd expect from a fighter too. WHen you are using custom control surfaces, if the hinge axis of the control surface is angled (not 90° to the longitudinal axis), you also need to angle the rotator. Otherwise, it looks ugly when you move the control surface.
Your comments:
"eternal darkness Just doesn’t like me"
"That’s like the second or third time he’s done that to me he’s giving me the reasons why and I have avoided them and they still get removed"
It always seems to be a minor offence, since you don't have any strikes. We do remove posts that are too far off-topic. I have, over time, removed quite a lot of "my cat died", "my friends in school don't like me", and similar posts despite off-topic tag, simply because they don't belong on SP.
Your "memes" included ones discussing sexuality, anti-vax movement, and male stripper plush toys (sexually suggestive?), among other things. That is not the kind of content that is appropriate for a site of a physics simulation/sandbox game.
@Prolex917 I don't have the ability to implement new features to the site. It's not necessary either. If a user decides to bring porn to a gaming site, they should know what to expect, a ban.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed for bypassing successor system, and for being taken from another build it is a part of with apparently no major changes done to it.
Considering the part count, I'd say there's more to this build than meets the eye. I suggest adding some closeup and interior (if there is one) pictures to description, since many of us can't download this monster.
I don't remember seeing any Airco's on the site. Nice work.
I suggest Hansa Brandenburg W.29. It's not a very common build, and it's somewhat unusual and interesting.
Welcome to the community. I see some users have already pointed you to the rules. Follow those rules, and you'll never have a problem with us red tags.
@Blob700004 to reply to a comment, and send notification to a user you are replying to, tag them as I've tagged you at the start of this comment. Clicking "Reply" button does it automatically for you.
I have removed your post as it looks too much like Nazi swastika. I understand you probably didn't do it on purpose, but please check if your build can be taken out of context before posting it.
@Subnerdica hence the remark. I understand that you dislike it, I mostly dislike it too, but don't bug me to remove it from the site if it's not against the rules.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
You seem to have stolen the truck from user IridiumCorporation without giving credit and with bypassing of successor system. This seems to be the original build.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@SimpleMADNESS I have removed his comment, but also yours for calling user an idiot. Be nice to new users and try to teach them how to behave in the community instead of insulting them.
@thefalkenreich your post has been removed for bypassing successor system. You have been issued a strike. Also, your comment has been removed. Don't ask people to upvote your posts.
@Chancey21 it seems more suited for a transport/attack helicopter role than for space battles though. Like those shuttles they used to deploy clones in the old movies.
One of the better designed SW ships. Decent firing arcs, one of only few SW ships where designers seem to have considered practicality of the design. Looks good so far.
@Zanbradcr3per the fact that I've made one doesn't mean you can't make another. Mine is certainly not the first, and probably won't stay the best forever.
@JakeTheDogg you can see the winches by ghosting the base of the turret and a few large pieces of the rear superstructure with Fine Tuner, and magnet is on the barrel lock just behind the cabin.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
While this is an acceptable successor, featuring enough changes from the original, there's no need to post it twice. I have removed one example, leaving the other.
Why would I? Custom airfoils are one of the features that separate low quality builds from medium and high quality ones. Not including them would mean posting a fice minute build, which I won't do.
@SHYNERAYQQ I take down posts that are against the rules, not any post I'm tagged on.
@Nickr you could use "report" button every now and then instead of tagging me. Give other moderators a chance to do something.
@Wyguy797 you need to make major and functional changes to an existing build if you want to post it. For example, improving the functionality of this build by perhaps making a better looking hydraulic system than on the original, or by making it perform some other role. Btw, I haven't issued you a strike since you seem to be new.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Rickyjasper2 three of your comments have been removed. Please don't be rude. If you think user has done something wrong, politely explain that to them.
The build looks nice, but you should definitely consider using a better looking airfoil. Roll rate is far lower than I'd expect from a fighter too. WHen you are using custom control surfaces, if the hinge axis of the control surface is angled (not 90° to the longitudinal axis), you also need to angle the rotator. Otherwise, it looks ugly when you move the control surface.
+1Your comments:
"eternal darkness Just doesn’t like me"
"That’s like the second or third time he’s done that to me he’s giving me the reasons why and I have avoided them and they still get removed"
It always seems to be a minor offence, since you don't have any strikes. We do remove posts that are too far off-topic. I have, over time, removed quite a lot of "my cat died", "my friends in school don't like me", and similar posts despite off-topic tag, simply because they don't belong on SP.
Your "memes" included ones discussing sexuality, anti-vax movement, and male stripper plush toys (sexually suggestive?), among other things. That is not the kind of content that is appropriate for a site of a physics simulation/sandbox game.
+3Because this isn't 9gag. If you are posting memes, keep them SP-related.
+3@Armyguy1534 hmm... ok.
+4Is this still a memorial post?
+5Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed for being too far off-topic.
@Prolex917 I don't have the ability to implement new features to the site. It's not necessary either. If a user decides to bring porn to a gaming site, they should know what to expect, a ban.
+7Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed as spam.
+4@CruzerBlade we won't remove every anime profile pictures. Only those those for which we have reason to believe have sexual connotation.
Your post has been removed as spam.
Your post has been removed for bypassing successor system, and for being taken from another build it is a part of with apparently no major changes done to it.
@grizzlitn no problem.
Considering the part count, I'd say there's more to this build than meets the eye. I suggest adding some closeup and interior (if there is one) pictures to description, since many of us can't download this monster.
+10I don't remember seeing any Airco's on the site. Nice work.
I suggest Hansa Brandenburg W.29. It's not a very common build, and it's somewhat unusual and interesting.
@carguy2007 just editing power isn't enough of a change. Anyone can do it for themselves and it takes less than twenty seconds to do.
It's called gimbal lock, apparently. Two axis match up. Multi-select the part or reset rotation as CrashFighter suggested.
+1Welcome to the community. I see some users have already pointed you to the rules. Follow those rules, and you'll never have a problem with us red tags.
+5@Blob700004 to reply to a comment, and send notification to a user you are replying to, tag them as I've tagged you at the start of this comment. Clicking "Reply" button does it automatically for you.
I have removed your post as it looks too much like Nazi swastika. I understand you probably didn't do it on purpose, but please check if your build can be taken out of context before posting it.
Everywhere. Make it a Christmas plane.
+5@Subnerdica hence the remark. I understand that you dislike it, I mostly dislike it too, but don't bug me to remove it from the site if it's not against the rules.
@Nutsee could you please change your profile picture to something @Subnerdica won't find sexually arousing?
@Nutsee no problem. You have been issued a strike for sharing sexusally suggestive content (animated pornography).
I have re-approved your bio. There's nothing in your mod notes to suggest why it was removed.
@JamesBleriot she could have stubbed her toe though. I think people do that occasionally in Japanese cartoons.
@Armyguy1534 well, we all started from the bottom :)
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
You seem to have stolen the truck from user IridiumCorporation without giving credit and with bypassing of successor system. This seems to be the original build.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
It looks very nice, but has more drag than an apartment building and power to weight ratio of a jet fighter.
+5@SimpleMADNESS I have removed his comment, but also yours for calling user an idiot. Be nice to new users and try to teach them how to behave in the community instead of insulting them.
+16@thefalkenreich your post has been removed for bypassing successor system. You have been issued a strike. Also, your comment has been removed. Don't ask people to upvote your posts.
@Jokowi lol, I saw it seconds before the tag. Shouldn't you add description before tagging people though?
@Chancey21 it seems more suited for a transport/attack helicopter role than for space battles though. Like those shuttles they used to deploy clones in the old movies.
+1One of the better designed SW ships. Decent firing arcs, one of only few SW ships where designers seem to have considered practicality of the design. Looks good so far.
+3@Zanbradcr3per the fact that I've made one doesn't mean you can't make another. Mine is certainly not the first, and probably won't stay the best forever.
@TheMitsuboshiBoi could you not have posted it unlisted?
Don't tag me, I'm following you.
+2@JakeTheDogg you can see the winches by ghosting the base of the turret and a few large pieces of the rear superstructure with Fine Tuner, and magnet is on the barrel lock just behind the cabin.
+1Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
While this is an acceptable successor, featuring enough changes from the original, there's no need to post it twice. I have removed one example, leaving the other.
Why would I? Custom airfoils are one of the features that separate low quality builds from medium and high quality ones. Not including them would mean posting a fice minute build, which I won't do.
+8@VINCENT68245 thanks :)
@SHYNERAYQQ I take down posts that are against the rules, not any post I'm tagged on.
@Nickr you could use "report" button every now and then instead of tagging me. Give other moderators a chance to do something.
@Wyguy797 you need to make major and functional changes to an existing build if you want to post it. For example, improving the functionality of this build by perhaps making a better looking hydraulic system than on the original, or by making it perform some other role. Btw, I haven't issued you a strike since you seem to be new.
It looks very nice. Looking at the stats though, I'd say it has too much drag and way too much power.
+4