@imprezamk I don't. It's simpler to let others deal with the miscreants. I've had my boost of reputation out of it, and there was nothing left for me in that role anyway.
You could maybe have a small piece somewhere creating drag. If you are sure it's not that, it could be mass. Make sure that collisions are disabled on all moving parts, as that can cause roll too.
Another common mistake is airfoil of the vertical stabilizer or rudder not being symmetric.
This is a beautiful build. It flies very well, behaves like an airship, weapons are functional...
It is under-detailed. If your device can run more parts, I suggest going all out on this concept. If not, perhaps build a smaller one so you can detail it.
Either way, I enjoyed playing with this build. Cheers.
That's a stupid default remove message for copies. I hardly ever used it when I was a moderator, since it poorly explains the offense.
I always sought to leave more precise and witty remove/ban messages.
@Clutch123 I can no longer help you with that kind of thing, and Andrew generally doesn't bother with the community. I think @Vincent is your best bet.
(Vincent, if you are reading this, bottom comment)
Is the challenge accepting armored fighting vehicles that border on tanks or are often mislabeled as tanks, such as assault guns, self-propelled artillery, wheeled vehicles with tank guns, and tank destroyers?
By the way, this is a pretty nice challenge. Good luck with it.
@LobsterBisque128 you are allowed to use any engines you want, of course. I have provided these for the people who have no previous experience in making things levitate. As for the rest, I don't quite understand what you mean.
@BluestBoi oh, never mind that. When you have a history of hosting popular challenges, you learn to use as much of a harsh tone as you can. It makes people read the rules carefully, resulting in higher quality of entries, and more good airships for the community to enjoy.
@BluestBoi this challenge template has been developed by me years ago, and has since been copied by pretty much every successful challenge. If you don't like it, you don't have to participate.
Besides, while I would accept criticism of a fellow veteran player, I will not accept it from someone who hasn't even seen a fraction of this community yet, or explored one hundredth of the possibilities this game has to offer.
You're insane mate.
Amazing build. It was a pleasure watching it progress, and the end result is something I would really enjoy if my PC were ten times more powerful.
@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
@BeastHunter that's strictly a US problem. I come from a nation that has been enslaved throughout most of the history, and that doesn't even have black people. Hence, I am completely insensitive to that word, and it doesn't impact my belief in freedom of speech one bit. Quite the opposite, in fact. If we ban words that offend some people, more people will find new words that offend them. We might as well, at that point, make a list of words approved by the government and not use any others.
In the culture I come from, nobody is offended by pejoratives. They are just names for certain groups of people.
@GermanPaperProjects I am not a racist. I believe all people are born equal, and race or genetics do not, on their own, dictate person's character or lifestyle.
I believe in unlimited freedom of speech, and in simple language that uses the simplest possible label for everything, regardless of how self-entitled people feel about it.
@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
It looks really nice, but it flies like a brick.
I think you should increase the size of ailerons, increase the size of actual elevator wings by a lot, and balance it better. It rolls heavily to the left.
She's too fast and a bit prone to drifting, but building style is great, especially for the part count. Very efficient as well. Weapon systems work perfectly. All in all, a very good build, I love it.
Having test-flown this plane, I have a few more suggestions. You should enable trim on elevators, and flaps are set so that one goes up and the other down when VTOL slider is moved. Other than that, very pleasant build to fly.
You should try to get elevator hinge line straight. You can achieve that with Overload. Other than that, exceptionally good looking build for a new guy, very promising.
Custom wings are very rare on first builds.
I advise using tags to make your build easier to find by others in the future.
Welcome to the community.
The build is very nice. I like it.
I'd just like to offer a small correction to the description: Tu-128 was an interceptor, not a fighter. The role of an interceptor is as far removed from the role of a fighter as is a bomber or an attacker. It's not a plane built for air superiority, but solely for taking out incoming bombers and reconnaissance aircraft.
@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
@WinsWings it is.
+1@imprezamk I don't. It's simpler to let others deal with the miscreants. I've had my boost of reputation out of it, and there was nothing left for me in that role anyway.
You could maybe have a small piece somewhere creating drag. If you are sure it's not that, it could be mass. Make sure that collisions are disabled on all moving parts, as that can cause roll too.
Another common mistake is airfoil of the vertical stabilizer or rudder not being symmetric.
This is a beautiful build. It flies very well, behaves like an airship, weapons are functional...
+2It is under-detailed. If your device can run more parts, I suggest going all out on this concept. If not, perhaps build a smaller one so you can detail it.
Either way, I enjoyed playing with this build. Cheers.
Thanks for the entry. It looks really nice.
+1Finally, a biblically accurate build.
+22That's a stupid default remove message for copies. I hardly ever used it when I was a moderator, since it poorly explains the offense.
+26I always sought to leave more precise and witty remove/ban messages.
@Quartz05 you don't have to, of course, though you could benefit from it. We're sharing ideas and techniques there.
+1@Clutch123 I can no longer help you with that kind of thing, and Andrew generally doesn't bother with the community. I think @Vincent is your best bet.
(Vincent, if you are reading this, bottom comment)
I don't know if you already have them, but I'd like to see your take on my two favorite planes, Antonov An-2 and Pilatus Pc-6.
+4Is the challenge accepting armored fighting vehicles that border on tanks or are often mislabeled as tanks, such as assault guns, self-propelled artillery, wheeled vehicles with tank guns, and tank destroyers?
+1By the way, this is a pretty nice challenge. Good luck with it.
@LobsterBisque128 you are allowed to use any engines you want, of course. I have provided these for the people who have no previous experience in making things levitate. As for the rest, I don't quite understand what you mean.
It looks really nice. I'll accept it without any penalty, despite the part count. Thanks for the entry (:
@XandyCandy this challenge is still ongoing. You are free to participate.
This should have been a forum post. Builds are for when you actually build something. This isn't worth fifteen points per upvote.
+7@ACGspOfficial let's say a winner should receive ten upvotes. You go to ten of their builds, and upvote them. That's really all there is to it.
+3@Randomplayer sure.
@ACGspOfficial by upvoting their builds.
+1@ShocK69 why don't you make one?
@32 it isn't. It has too few parts, and I don't think it stands enough chance to win for me to excuse that. It is an interesting build though.
@BluestBoi oh, never mind that. When you have a history of hosting popular challenges, you learn to use as much of a harsh tone as you can. It makes people read the rules carefully, resulting in higher quality of entries, and more good airships for the community to enjoy.
+1@BluestBoi what part is bothering you exactly?
@BluestBoi this challenge template has been developed by me years ago, and has since been copied by pretty much every successful challenge. If you don't like it, you don't have to participate.
+2Besides, while I would accept criticism of a fellow veteran player, I will not accept it from someone who hasn't even seen a fraction of this community yet, or explored one hundredth of the possibilities this game has to offer.
Thanks for the entry.
+1@WarringMunky I'm not a Catholic priest.
+3@Kerbango it's very nice.
You could do LZ-120 for my challenge.
I didn't think I'd ever see a Kraguj properly done on SP. Good job.
+1@MrShenanigansSP I will probably accommodate a few late entries.
+1@UnmanagedReservoir you can't limit art, eh?
+1@UnmanagedReservoir you can't limit art, eh?
You're insane mate.
+4Amazing build. It was a pleasure watching it progress, and the end result is something I would really enjoy if my PC were ten times more powerful.
@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
+1@BeastHunter that's strictly a US problem. I come from a nation that has been enslaved throughout most of the history, and that doesn't even have black people. Hence, I am completely insensitive to that word, and it doesn't impact my belief in freedom of speech one bit. Quite the opposite, in fact. If we ban words that offend some people, more people will find new words that offend them. We might as well, at that point, make a list of words approved by the government and not use any others.
In the culture I come from, nobody is offended by pejoratives. They are just names for certain groups of people.
@GermanPaperProjects @Graingy for clarification of my attitude, refer to the comment below.
@GermanPaperProjects I am not a racist. I believe all people are born equal, and race or genetics do not, on their own, dictate person's character or lifestyle.
+3I believe in unlimited freedom of speech, and in simple language that uses the simplest possible label for everything, regardless of how self-entitled people feel about it.
@Graingy no worries.
@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
+1Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
+1I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
It looks really nice, but it flies like a brick.
+5I think you should increase the size of ailerons, increase the size of actual elevator wings by a lot, and balance it better. It rolls heavily to the left.
She's too fast and a bit prone to drifting, but building style is great, especially for the part count. Very efficient as well. Weapon systems work perfectly. All in all, a very good build, I love it.
+5This is a very impressive trawler. I don't think I've seen actual funcfioning trawling features before in the game.
@Garuda dobrodošao na SimplePlanes. Ovo je jednostavan, brzinski projekat, ali mi je drago da ti se sviđa.
+1@Dathcha ah, the good old times XD
Having test-flown this plane, I have a few more suggestions. You should enable trim on elevators, and flaps are set so that one goes up and the other down when VTOL slider is moved. Other than that, very pleasant build to fly.
You should try to get elevator hinge line straight. You can achieve that with Overload. Other than that, exceptionally good looking build for a new guy, very promising.
Custom wings are very rare on first builds.
I advise using tags to make your build easier to find by others in the future.
Welcome to the community.
The build is very nice. I like it.
I'd just like to offer a small correction to the description: Tu-128 was an interceptor, not a fighter. The role of an interceptor is as far removed from the role of a fighter as is a bomber or an attacker. It's not a plane built for air superiority, but solely for taking out incoming bombers and reconnaissance aircraft.
Are those custom wings that I see? (:
+1@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
+1"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
@Terminator2809 You had a message accompanying the ban.
+1