@WiiMini getting people to mass report is an abuse of the report feature, and is a bannable offense. Please refrain from doing it again. Moderators are here for a reason.
Your post has been removed for targeting a specific user. Said user has been dealt with though. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, but next time please do it more discreetly.
@UltraLight yes and no. It's a borderline case. I advise using plain screenshot, maybe with some subtle filters and text.
BTW, you can only tag three people in a comment. Only the first three will receive notification. No need to edit it now, they were all already tagged in individual comments.
@UltraLight I think "thanks for the spotlight" would suffice. By copy-pasting and pinning every spotlight message, you're just clogging up your comment section.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook cordScale property needs to be set to 7-8 for the prop to work just under the surface. As the depth increases, you need bigger cordScale.
@SmSmThe10684 I checked the teaser. You have tagged twelve people, and even if we count upvotes as tags, not nearly that many asked for it.
Yes, you can reupload.
Your post has been removed for continuing the drama.
I understand that you're just trying to express your counter-opinion as vocally as the original opinion was expressed. However, posts like these do no good to the community.
I have edited your post to exclude the part where you are calling out a specific user. Said user did not consent to his builds being used as a negative example. Do it again and you will be issued a strike.
I disagree with this post. First of all, this isn't a new trend. Users like General360 and ccooper/Zed have thrived on quantity over quality since forever, ccooper going so far as to reach the number one spot on the users list. Secondly, many of the lower quality users have friends who will upvote their builds. Thirdly, not everyone shares your criteria on what makes a good build. Many users genuinely like the creations you're calling out here.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@KnightOfRen I wouldn't strike you over an opinion. That would be abusing mod powers.
Let's not spam this comment section though. If you want to talk more, you know where to find me.
@KnightOfRen I don't do the whole build for a thumbnail. I do fuselage art. However, I always post an example of a build that would score high so people can see I'm competent to judge their entries.
@APilotOfPlanes this challenge is acceptable. I wouldn't join it though. If you don't have a bushplane presentable enough to be in the thumbnail, how can you fairly rate bushplanes?
Moderator here. Welcome to the community. To make people receive notification of your comment, you must tag them as you did in this comment. I see you have read the rules. Follow them, and you'll never have a problem with red-tags. If you need any help with the community, see someone breaking the rules, or need build advice, feel free to tag me.
@Alucard689 it means that your build is listed among the successors of the challenge, and he gets seven points whenever you get an upvote. Basically, the reason to have this feature is so that original builder can receive points when somebody modifies and posts their build, but it is commonly used for challenges to make keeping track of entries easier. Now that your build is a successor to the challenge, it is officially a challenge entry.
I can make it not a successor again if you don't want to be a part of the challenge.
Most of the build is very nice. However, main gear retraction is so far below your usual quality it made an onion cry. Both the wheel and the door panel keep sticking out a lot.
Sure. You could have asked Blue0Bull too though.
@Blizt oh, I don't have ships with so few parts. You can delete some details from my 600-700 part ships.
@TheCityCopzz usually three, though that depends on the severity of the offenses.
@Blizt what do you consider mobile friendly? I have ships with as few as 620 parts.
Your post has been removed. Please keep your forum posts in the Forum section.
@WiiMini getting people to mass report is an abuse of the report feature, and is a bannable offense. Please refrain from doing it again. Moderators are here for a reason.
Your post has been removed for targeting a specific user. Said user has been dealt with though. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, but next time please do it more discreetly.
@UltraLight frankly, I'm not sure. I think it will.
@UltraLight yes and no. It's a borderline case. I advise using plain screenshot, maybe with some subtle filters and text.
BTW, you can only tag three people in a comment. Only the first three will receive notification. No need to edit it now, they were all already tagged in individual comments.
@UltraLight I think "thanks for the spotlight" would suffice. By copy-pasting and pinning every spotlight message, you're just clogging up your comment section.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
cordScaleproperty needs to be set to 7-8 for the prop to work just under the surface. As the depth increases, you need biggercordScale.@brians1209 sure.
+1@Cabbage17 it won't be removed if it's your own. However, most challenge hosts don't allow edits of old builds.
+1@SmSmThe10684 I checked the teaser. You have tagged twelve people, and even if we count upvotes as tags, not nearly that many asked for it.
Yes, you can reupload.
Your post has been removed for mass tagging.
"Upvote to be tagged" is begging for upvotes. I have edited that part out.
Your post has been removed for continuing the drama.
I understand that you're just trying to express your counter-opinion as vocally as the original opinion was expressed. However, posts like these do no good to the community.
@ToxicToxicTheVito REW didn't request his content to be removed. KnightOfRen did. I also don't think REW will mind being used as a positive example.
@Demogorgon don't hate people. Hating people is bad.
+1I have edited your post to exclude the part where you are calling out a specific user. Said user did not consent to his builds being used as a negative example. Do it again and you will be issued a strike.
I disagree with this post. First of all, this isn't a new trend. Users like General360 and ccooper/Zed have thrived on quantity over quality since forever, ccooper going so far as to reach the number one spot on the users list. Secondly, many of the lower quality users have friends who will upvote their builds. Thirdly, not everyone shares your criteria on what makes a good build. Many users genuinely like the creations you're calling out here.
+1Done.
+1@STUKAWOLF87 sure. You only can't tag random people to get attention to your post.
@STUKAWOLF87 you can tag a user or two for that if you think they'll be willing to help.
@lxc010826 sure, you can repost this build. The rule isn't on the "Rules" page because Andrew is lazy, so you didn't get a strike.
@lxc010826 Your post has been removed for mass tagging.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Done.
@AzureCorp You need to give me a link to the challenge.
Pyramid ship.
You have a strike now. Get two more and you will be banned.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
2 good. Pls nerf.
+2@KnightOfRen I wouldn't strike you over an opinion. That would be abusing mod powers.
Let's not spam this comment section though. If you want to talk more, you know where to find me.
@KnightOfRen I don't do the whole build for a thumbnail. I do fuselage art. However, I always post an example of a build that would score high so people can see I'm competent to judge their entries.
@APilotOfPlanes this challenge is acceptable. I wouldn't join it though. If you don't have a bushplane presentable enough to be in the thumbnail, how can you fairly rate bushplanes?
@STUKAWOLF87 no. If they don't want to be in the challenge, you can't force them.
@BuiltBionixInd10 might be him. I only did a quick check, didn't investigate deeper.
It would seem that the account has been deleted by the user and that no new one has been made.
@DeathStalker627 this account has been inactive for almost half a decade. Why spotlight?
+1Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Moderator here. Welcome to the community. To make people receive notification of your comment, you must tag them as you did in this comment. I see you have read the rules. Follow them, and you'll never have a problem with red-tags. If you need any help with the community, see someone breaking the rules, or need build advice, feel free to tag me.
+10@STUKAWOLF87 thanks :)
@DefinitelyNotAnFBI @Someterribleuser it is now a successor.
@UNOWENWasHer I have removed underscores from your username, as they rendered you impossible to tag.
@Alucard689 it means that your build is listed among the successors of the challenge, and he gets seven points whenever you get an upvote. Basically, the reason to have this feature is so that original builder can receive points when somebody modifies and posts their build, but it is commonly used for challenges to make keeping track of entries easier. Now that your build is a successor to the challenge, it is officially a challenge entry.
+1I can make it not a successor again if you don't want to be a part of the challenge.
@TCollins thanks :)
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook sure.
+1@SavageMan it doesn't fully retract. Door panel doesn't get flush with the skin, it stays a bit open.
+5Most of the build is very nice. However, main gear retraction is so far below your usual quality it made an onion cry. Both the wheel and the door panel keep sticking out a lot.
+1