Looks like a real thing. I will take MoterKade's word about its handling, since I currently don't have the time to test it. Tag me on its final version please, I'll be looking forward to it.
@Razr depends on the situation. Big rotator is, in my opinion, obsolete. Small rotator (and the old, big one) simulate the rotating part being placed on an axel. Hinge rotator simulates joint or a hinge.
That simply means that you have to upgrade your basic technique or start making something more interesting. Keep in mind, both looks and performance are important. Good basic design plus details is a winning combination.
If you want to embed a link (make a clickable link) write it like this: [text that you want to be seen] (link), with no space in between.
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you being a Bosnian nationalist is enough for me to end this conversation now. Please remove your comments from my post. Just to be clear, I do have friends in Bosnia. I do not support anybody's nationalism. Go away.
No problem. Since Latent suggested it, I'll try to leave a comment with every upvote describing why I upvoted. I suggest you, and everyone, do the same.
It looks so cool. Unfortunately, I don't have time to flight test it now, but - Note to self: cream on green looks great.
Just one thing I noticed: with a 53mm auto-canon, it's more of a ground attack plane than fighter. That's one big gun.
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you only know the side of the story brodcasted by western media. War crimes were on both sides. War on kosovo was between JNA and OVK, which was supported by Alkaida. NATO stepped in for OVK to make its puppet state on Balkan Peninsula. No Bosnian, Croatian, or Albanian commander was held responsible. Only Serbs, because we were pro-russin, not pro-american like other factions.
@DanAviation build a lot of good stuff. I did that and got to platinum in 3 months and 3 days. Don't build for upvotes. Google "airplane", or "weird vehicle concept" or something if you are out of ideas. Check what you haven't made yet. Looking at your profile, I have to suggest: add details. Many of your builds are good bases for improvements. I could spend an hour on many of them, and make them much better by adding details. You can do the same. No slacking. When you build it, save it, and come back to it tomorrow. Look at it for 15 minutes, and think what you can add. That way, you'll get to the dark side.
@Toscio56 I'm not asking you to explain and show me every single detail, or how to use Google to find info about something. What I'm interested in is the general technique you use to achieve such performance. I could probably figure it out myself, but I'm too busy these days. Anyway, thanks for considering...
I have upvoted this plane when I first saw it. Since then, it has been sitting in my favorites. I finally came around to test it.
Conclusion:
How do I upvote one model twice? Great overall look, excellent cockpit, perfect maneuvering... Have you thought about making a tutorial for making planes like this? I'm impressed.
@ChasingHorizon I don't care. My hulls are built in under 10 minutes a piece. It's a simple technique. I know at least one user who used it before me, and at least one who discovered them independently few days ago.
Quite a good concept. The plane itself is a bit sluggish on controls, but that's what makes landing it without wheels so easy. Overall, I like it.
A suggestion: if not the wheels, then why not a rail under it's nose? It would allow it to land like a glider.
@TheLatentImage I couldn't agree more. Only problem is a bug that came into existence with 1.4. When I download a plane, I need to find it in the file browser and open it from there. Then, due to performance of my phone, I have to close file browser in order to play with the plane I downloaded. Because of that, since 1.4. came out, I'm downloading only the best looking models. Once devs fix that, I'll probably be downloading a lot more.
In case that @AndrewGarrison notices this comment, the device is Sony Xperia E4g.
@CaliphIndustries "we don't talk about it" was answer to CL4TRP mentioning secret community of top quality builders. For you, and anyone else, my advice is: Use xml, Fine Tuner mod, nudge.
Take your time. You can't make a great model in under five hours in editor.
Focus on details. If it doesn't look appling, it probably won't even be downloaded. For the same reason, take good screenshots. Experiment with angles, try to catch the best of it... Also, for the same reason, use bright, lively colors.
Of course, in the end, it's performance that sells it. If it looks good, but flies/rolls bad, it's bad.
@Benny3053 no problem.
Good job, buddy. This plane looks great and flies really well. @Cedy117, a feature?
Looks like a real thing. I will take MoterKade's word about its handling, since I currently don't have the time to test it. Tag me on its final version please, I'll be looking forward to it.
No. That leads to real price system, which leads to "pay to win". Your suggestion is nice, but it would eventually have bad consequences.
@Johndfg no problem
@Razr depends on the situation. Big rotator is, in my opinion, obsolete. Small rotator (and the old, big one) simulate the rotating part being placed on an axel. Hinge rotator simulates joint or a hinge.
Nice work. Looks great.
Oh, it's a Chinese Ilyushin Il-76 ripoff. Yous is definitely better.
Cool. I love this tank so much that I have a model of it in my room. Thanks for making it.
I never thought I'll see this plane on SP. Good job.
+1It looks really cool. Keep up the good work.
@Benny3053 no problem
I wish you all the luck with that. I'll be looking forward to your ships.
@DanAviation no problem, buddy.
That simply means that you have to upgrade your basic technique or start making something more interesting. Keep in mind, both looks and performance are important. Good basic design plus details is a winning combination.
If you want to embed a link (make a clickable link) write it like this: [text that you want to be seen] (link), with no space in between.
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you being a Bosnian nationalist is enough for me to end this conversation now. Please remove your comments from my post. Just to be clear, I do have friends in Bosnia. I do not support anybody's nationalism. Go away.
Great work. I love detailed builds. It really looks realistic.
@Othawne no problem, m8
@Othawne oh. Ok. It's a lovely plane anyway.
No problem. Since Latent suggested it, I'll try to leave a comment with every upvote describing why I upvoted. I suggest you, and everyone, do the same.
It looks so cool. Unfortunately, I don't have time to flight test it now, but - Note to self: cream on green looks great.
Just one thing I noticed: with a 53mm auto-canon, it's more of a ground attack plane than fighter. That's one big gun.
Hey, it's one of them ships! I like those =3
Interesting idea, @SimpleFlow. Upvote for creativit..
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you only know the side of the story brodcasted by western media. War crimes were on both sides. War on kosovo was between JNA and OVK, which was supported by Alkaida. NATO stepped in for OVK to make its puppet state on Balkan Peninsula. No Bosnian, Croatian, or Albanian commander was held responsible. Only Serbs, because we were pro-russin, not pro-american like other factions.
So cool. Great job, buddy. Keep it up!
@DanAviation build a lot of good stuff. I did that and got to platinum in 3 months and 3 days. Don't build for upvotes. Google "airplane", or "weird vehicle concept" or something if you are out of ideas. Check what you haven't made yet. Looking at your profile, I have to suggest: add details. Many of your builds are good bases for improvements. I could spend an hour on many of them, and make them much better by adding details. You can do the same. No slacking. When you build it, save it, and come back to it tomorrow. Look at it for 15 minutes, and think what you can add. That way, you'll get to the dark side.
@Stingray no problem
@DestinyAviation I'm glad that you did. I would start following you now, but I already am.
Nice. I like the details on it.
Yey, my suggestion was accepted 0,_,0
@DestinyAviation glad to hear it. Tag me on it, I want to play with it.
@Toscio56 I'm not asking you to explain and show me every single detail, or how to use Google to find info about something. What I'm interested in is the general technique you use to achieve such performance. I could probably figure it out myself, but I'm too busy these days. Anyway, thanks for considering...
@mikoyanster thanks
@Johndfg no problem. I asked for An2, and you did a great job delivering one.
@AndrewGarrison I'm using Opera to download. Later I access them via ES file explorer. I never had that problem before 1.4.
@warlord1128 no problem, but keep it in mind from now on please.
@TheInvisible no problem.
@CaliphIndustries no problem, buddy. Advice is easy to give and free to take.
Well, I'm glad I helped, at least indirectly. Good work, my friend. I'll be looking forward to your future builds @TheInvisible.
@Noman0rumeral no problem
Simple and effective, just like the real one. Good job.
I have upvoted this plane when I first saw it. Since then, it has been sitting in my favorites. I finally came around to test it.
Conclusion:
How do I upvote one model twice? Great overall look, excellent cockpit, perfect maneuvering... Have you thought about making a tutorial for making planes like this? I'm impressed.
@ChasingHorizon I don't care. My hulls are built in under 10 minutes a piece. It's a simple technique. I know at least one user who used it before me, and at least one who discovered them independently few days ago.
Quite a good concept. The plane itself is a bit sluggish on controls, but that's what makes landing it without wheels so easy. Overall, I like it.
A suggestion: if not the wheels, then why not a rail under it's nose? It would allow it to land like a glider.
@TheLatentImage I couldn't agree more. Only problem is a bug that came into existence with 1.4. When I download a plane, I need to find it in the file browser and open it from there. Then, due to performance of my phone, I have to close file browser in order to play with the plane I downloaded. Because of that, since 1.4. came out, I'm downloading only the best looking models. Once devs fix that, I'll probably be downloading a lot more.
In case that @AndrewGarrison notices this comment, the device is Sony Xperia E4g.
No problem @Benny3053
Congrats
Great job. I love it.
@Polandball you sunk a destroyer with a patrol boat?! Cool.
@CaliphIndustries "we don't talk about it" was answer to CL4TRP mentioning secret community of top quality builders. For you, and anyone else, my advice is: Use xml, Fine Tuner mod, nudge.
Take your time. You can't make a great model in under five hours in editor.
Focus on details. If it doesn't look appling, it probably won't even be downloaded. For the same reason, take good screenshots. Experiment with angles, try to catch the best of it... Also, for the same reason, use bright, lively colors.
Of course, in the end, it's performance that sells it. If it looks good, but flies/rolls bad, it's bad.