@jamesPLANESii why? Will there be, if I quit, an EternalDarkness tag for medium/high quality planes built on mobile? And for everyone that quits, a new tag...
Hmm, not bad. Another suggestion I forgot is: try spending more time on individual models. And when I say time, I mean a couple of days of constant improving.
It's nice. I would suggest just a few changes. Landing gear on biplanes is usually fixed (doesn't retract), and top wing is usually seme as the bottom one, or longer.
@ElysiumDarkness ok. First of all, make your own stuff. Successors, even if they are quite different from the original, never get a lot of upvotes.
Disassemble other user's planes to se how they do it (the ones that you like, and start with relatively simple ones, advancing step by step).
Old, squary blocks are almost useless. Play with resizable fuselage blocks. If you overlap them correctly, you can get almost any imaginable shape.
Base your planes on the real ones. They don't have to be replicas, but try to copy the general shape and proportions. That's all I have for now.
@SummonerOfThunderstorms hey, I've been following you for quite some time, and then you disappeared. Where have you been? (I used to be MaleticAirplanes)
@Valkyrie thanks. There will be more soon (I actually had a release planned for tonight (now), but decided to postpone it by 24 hours to tweak performance).
For me, it's the thrill of making a plane/ship/vehicle. I'm trying to make them as good as I can. Since those "Internet points" are (supposed to be) a community's rating of the build, I do give some importance to them. Acquiring points any other way than by building good stuff is, for me, cheating.
@ElysiumDarkness this one took five days to perfect. Give your builds time. Don't upload until you are completely satisfied, and can't find a single thing to add or change.
For me, it's the thrill of making a plane/ship/vehicle. I'm trying to make them as good as I can. Since those "Internet points" are (supposed to be) a community's rating of the build, I do give some importance to them. Acquiring points any other way than by building good stuff is, for me, cheating.
Somewhere, a Navy pilot from the 50s says "oh god no, not this thing again!" and commits suicide =/ (the reputation of this plane was awful. It's a great replica.)
Maybe. If it's on the build, tag me on unlisted with a description of the problem. If it's something else, again, tag me on unlisted (just upload a cockpit as unlisted). I avoid decided to avoid conversations in public.
@Somethingismadebyme i ja to ponekad radim =)
@Somethingismadebyme nema na čemu
It has the tiny pilot =) I love it
@WeeBabySeamus no problem. I love the fact that it's mobile friendly, so I could actually try it out. Thanks for caring about mobile users.
@jamesPLANESii why? Will there be, if I quit, an EternalDarkness tag for medium/high quality planes built on mobile? And for everyone that quits, a new tag...
Hmm, not bad. Another suggestion I forgot is: try spending more time on individual models. And when I say time, I mean a couple of days of constant improving.
It's nice. I would suggest just a few changes. Landing gear on biplanes is usually fixed (doesn't retract), and top wing is usually seme as the bottom one, or longer.
@VladCelTroll I'm glad you like it. It ate a lot of effort.
@ElysiumDarkness ok. First of all, make your own stuff. Successors, even if they are quite different from the original, never get a lot of upvotes.
Disassemble other user's planes to se how they do it (the ones that you like, and start with relatively simple ones, advancing step by step).
Old, squary blocks are almost useless. Play with resizable fuselage blocks. If you overlap them correctly, you can get almost any imaginable shape.
Base your planes on the real ones. They don't have to be replicas, but try to copy the general shape and proportions. That's all I have for now.
@SummonerOfThunderstorms great. I always loved your builds. If you were active, you would be well into gold by now.
@SummonerOfThunderstorms hey, I've been following you for quite some time, and then you disappeared. Where have you been? (I used to be MaleticAirplanes)
This looks great, and flies even better. @WeeBabySeamus you have captured the soul of the F/A-18 within 270 parts.
@ChaMikey I didn't tell my phone to do that... It must have bugged out. I'll remove them.
Third best? Nah... Third highest rated.
@ChaMikey no problem
He's a good builder. His stuff is usually high quality. A lot of details. That's what sells. He has 54 (now 55) followers.
This looks great. I know platinums who could never make such a good model. Great job, @Nico66.
@Valkyrie thanks. There will be more soon (I actually had a release planned for tonight (now), but decided to postpone it by 24 hours to tweak performance).
For me, it's the thrill of making a plane/ship/vehicle. I'm trying to make them as good as I can. Since those "Internet points" are (supposed to be) a community's rating of the build, I do give some importance to them. Acquiring points any other way than by building good stuff is, for me, cheating.
Hey, now it has two engines! =)
@ElysiumDarkness I can provide advice
@ElysiumDarkness this one took five days to perfect. Give your builds time. Don't upload until you are completely satisfied, and can't find a single thing to add or change.
No problem @RedBeard66
Opa, pa ovo stvarno jeste "something" =3
@CaraTuning no problem. It's a lovely machine
@Ephwurd I'm glad to hear it. But if all of us are against him, how did he get all of those upvotes?!
Great job. And the great use of those propellers. I love it!
@MasterManufacturingCo so, I'm not alone in disliking one of the top five users? Good.
@JTM55 of course.
@Sutairs no problem, buddy, and thank you too =)
For me, it's the thrill of making a plane/ship/vehicle. I'm trying to make them as good as I can. Since those "Internet points" are (supposed to be) a community's rating of the build, I do give some importance to them. Acquiring points any other way than by building good stuff is, for me, cheating.
You don't know how to xml?! You made all of those nice buils without xml!? M8, you got a new follower.
It looks great so far, @jamesPLANESii. I can't wait to see the more detailed version. If you want, you can use gauges from my older builds.
Nice work. I also usually use wing gun for cannons.
@PINK great. It's my old quick build, so I didn't experiment too much with it.
It looks great. When will it be out?
Even though I am currently working on perfecting my paint job skills, I gave you some points.
@DUDMIN yes, it looks like Antonov An2, the biggest single engine biplane ever produced.
@ChaMikey no problem, buddy
@marcel700 thanks
@CL4TRP lol
@Squirrel @TheLatentImage
Somewhere, a Navy pilot from the 50s says "oh god no, not this thing again!" and commits suicide =/ (the reputation of this plane was awful. It's a great replica.)
Maybe. If it's on the build, tag me on unlisted with a description of the problem. If it's something else, again, tag me on unlisted (just upload a cockpit as unlisted). I avoid decided to avoid conversations in public.
@LotusEngineering his popularity comes from his quality. He is one of the only few users I admire.
Great job. I love it
@LotusEngineering yes. Check his builds if you don't trust me. It says "built on IOS" in properties
@XePec no problem
Exceptionally good job. It has both the correct shape and the right details. A proof that I didn't follow you by accident.
@Somethingismadebyme ne možeš da menjaš zvuk motora.