@CaesiciusPlanes you can simply download Discord, make a free account (takes less than a minute), and join. I think you can even log in with G+ and other stuff.
@CaesiciusPlanes bull###t. Anyone can build a good APC. Join me on Builders discord chat (you can join through a link in my bio if you aren't a member already), and I'll help you a bit.
Why would you even put a pilot? 5th gen already has RC mode planned for future versions. 6th gen probably won't even have the ability to carry a human pilot.
@Diver you can upload unlisted or catch me on Builders chat on Discord and show me a picture. You can get to Builders chat through a link in my bio if you aren't there already.
Not bad at all. Only thing I don't like are the road performance. I suggest adding dead weight to the bottom, lowering the hull (nudging wheels up), reducing engine power a bit, and adding "maxAngularVelocity = "x" " to the wheels to limit their speed. Experiment with "x" value until you get desired max speed. I don't see why it's a successor to Noman0rumeral's T-90. Seems to be made from scratch.
@Diver 100 part creation would stand no chance of winning against entries already submitted. You are pretty good with your limited part count, but not that good.
@TheDerpingMemes I would rather save room for those who have better chances. Your build has missed the subject by not being armoured. Thus, it has failed from the start. It's simply not for this challenge.
Nice vehicle, but not quite BM-21-like. It's too low. Real BM-21 has its cabin over the gearbox, and is quite tall. It's mounted on Ural-375 truck. Hood should be as tall as it is wide, approximately. Hood is also too long. It gives a feel of a large pickup truck, not an off-road beast.
@TheDerpingMemes it's not bad, but it doesn't stand a chance of winning for multiple reasons. So I'll have to reject it. I'll give some feedback on the build.
I'll give you an example a friend reluctant to interact with other users on subjects like this gave me. Let's say you are going to a coffee shop to get a coffee. You want a good cup of coffee. Of course, you'll first go to a coffee shop you know has good coffee. If everyone is talking good stuff about their coffee and everybody goes there, it must be worth checking out.
On the other hand, if you stray into the coffee shop known for bad coffee or not known at all, and get some great coffee, you'll tell your friends, and they'll come to check it out. That's why good builds by less popular builders get so many upvotes.
But if you go into a mediocre coffee shop and get a mediocre coffee, you won't even mention being there. You won't advertise that coffee shop to others, and it won't get new customers.
@Lilsmok rules are the rules, kiddo. I have just cited them and explained how I knew it's a copy. I'll let moderators do the rest. Best way to get respect in this community is to develop your technique by studying other people's builds and making your own from scratch.
@Lilsmok read rules of the site. If you click predecessor link, it shows identical older build by Spefyjerbf. Since Spefy and I are in some groups together, I watched him make this plane.
@DeezDucks realism. Different types of vehicles behave different, shoot different targets... Passing Armoured Games course isn't paramount. I might even have to rest some high part count vehicles on the stock map to avoid lag.
@Leehopard sure. Welcome aboard.
@Tank6376 I don't just go around adding friends. You can, however, join Builders chat server on Discord through a link in my bio.
That's a very unique design. I like it.
@CaesiciusPlanes you can simply download Discord, make a free account (takes less than a minute), and join. I think you can even log in with G+ and other stuff.
@CaesiciusPlanes bull###t. Anyone can build a good APC. Join me on Builders discord chat (you can join through a link in my bio if you aren't a member already), and I'll help you a bit.
@jamesPLANESii no problem. Great job on this plane.
Why would you even put a pilot? 5th gen already has RC mode planned for future versions. 6th gen probably won't even have the ability to carry a human pilot.
@mikoyanster ok, I'll add a link.
+1Is this for my challenge?
@Diver hopefully, a spot will stay open until I see something more promising.
@Diver it's better now. Still, I don't think you'll be able to add enough details to pair builds by users with far more powerful devices.
@Diver I can't access it. Deleted?
@Diver no, it's unfortunately not good enough. Shape has no room left for tracks or wheels, headlights, and other parts. Iy is also oversimplified.
Remind me to fly it tomorrow, please. I can't do it now. It looks great.
+3@SPCWorkshops ok, you have a spot.
@TheDerpingMemes I'm sorry to disappoint you, but it's nowhere near realistic and doesn't meat the minimum part count.
@GermanWarMachine me too. I gave my blessing. But he can post them unlisted.
@Tully2001 well, to be frank, I did want that job.
Dude, post them unlisted. And how many versions do you need for a 3d print anyway?
@mikoyanster it's very cute. Welcome aboard.
@Diver you can upload unlisted or catch me on Builders chat on Discord and show me a picture. You can get to Builders chat through a link in my bio if you aren't there already.
@whitewolf no problem.
@Diver just show me a picture of your progress on the build for this challenge. If I think it looks good so far, I'll add you to the list.
Not bad at all. Only thing I don't like are the road performance. I suggest adding dead weight to the bottom, lowering the hull (nudging wheels up), reducing engine power a bit, and adding "maxAngularVelocity = "x" " to the wheels to limit their speed. Experiment with "x" value until you get desired max speed. I don't see why it's a successor to Noman0rumeral's T-90. Seems to be made from scratch.
@Diver 100 part creation would stand no chance of winning against entries already submitted. You are pretty good with your limited part count, but not that good.
@TheDerpingMemes I would rather save room for those who have better chances. Your build has missed the subject by not being armoured. Thus, it has failed from the start. It's simply not for this challenge.
Nice vehicle, but not quite BM-21-like. It's too low. Real BM-21 has its cabin over the gearbox, and is quite tall. It's mounted on Ural-375 truck. Hood should be as tall as it is wide, approximately. Hood is also too long. It gives a feel of a large pickup truck, not an off-road beast.
+3@TheDerpingMemes it's not bad, but it doesn't stand a chance of winning for multiple reasons. So I'll have to reject it. I'll give some feedback on the build.
I'll give you an example a friend reluctant to interact with other users on subjects like this gave me. Let's say you are going to a coffee shop to get a coffee. You want a good cup of coffee. Of course, you'll first go to a coffee shop you know has good coffee. If everyone is talking good stuff about their coffee and everybody goes there, it must be worth checking out.
+4On the other hand, if you stray into the coffee shop known for bad coffee or not known at all, and get some great coffee, you'll tell your friends, and they'll come to check it out. That's why good builds by less popular builders get so many upvotes.
But if you go into a mediocre coffee shop and get a mediocre coffee, you won't even mention being there. You won't advertise that coffee shop to others, and it won't get new customers.
@TheDerpingMemes that doesn't really look like an armoured fighting vehicle. Just an MLRS.
@Lilsmok rules are the rules, kiddo. I have just cited them and explained how I knew it's a copy. I'll let moderators do the rest. Best way to get respect in this community is to develop your technique by studying other people's builds and making your own from scratch.
+1@Milo1628xa you don't have an idea of how common it is. Good thing we have good moderators.
+1@TheDerpingMemes show WIP to be added to the list of participants.
@Lilsmok read rules of the site. If you click predecessor link, it shows identical older build by Spefyjerbf. Since Spefy and I are in some groups together, I watched him make this plane.
This post is obviously a repost (copy) of another user's plane. That is against the rules. Please remove this post.
+1@DeezDucks realism. Different types of vehicles behave different, shoot different targets... Passing Armoured Games course isn't paramount. I might even have to rest some high part count vehicles on the stock map to avoid lag.
@DeezDucks lol
@XMarcoX you'll have a reserved place when I see some serious progress on that. When I can guess it's gonna be a good build.
@Piloteerz use contact form at the bottom of the page to recover ask developers to recover your password.
@CommanderSword I'll sign you up when I see a WIP. That's a measure meant to reduce the chance of competitors giving up.
@Kimcotupan15 ok. I'll sign you in.
@ErvenDynamics as long as they are armoured.
@JangoTheMango I would warn the candidate, giving him a deadline. If he doesn't meet it, I'd call another candidate.
@Baldeagle086 unfortunately, no. That's why I made armoured games.
@Alienbeef0421 I mean I'm interested in acquiring a number of these.
That's a great concept, @JangoTheMango. Both real and fictional entries are treated equally on this challenge.
@JangoTheMango ok, you're in.
@JangoTheMango sure. I'm looking forward to it. Can you show me a pic at least? Just to be fair to others.
@Hawkeye156 I don't use voice chat. You can join Builders chat through a link in my bio.
@Hawkeye156 yes. I'm chatting there right now. Builders chat.