@RamboJutter the way is removing excess drag via "dragScale" and "calculateDrag". Then you need much weaker engine to reach the speed. That engine will take more time to beat inertia of the plane.
@Bdidi no. I have rushed this build. Next plane will have it (if it's a plane that kinda looks like An-72. I'm not sure which one I'm going to upload next).
@Chancey21 this bird was an inch of getting scrapped, as I have already made a much better plane. I just wanted to kick it onto the site so it doesn't go to waste. And because I don't want to convert that better plane into maritime patrol aircraft with ugly radomes and MAD probe poles. This is, in my opinion, how a low gold player should build.
Andrew said it won't have them initially. However, it's one of the most popular requests, and adds far more versatility to the game. So, we can expect it on one of the updates.
It's nice. It has details, and flies well. But why no ailerons? I mean, there are hidden ones, but I don't see anything moving on the trailing edge of the wing. In my opinion, that's a big minus. Especially with so many simple techniques for custom wing with mechanical control surfaces all over the site.
@Comradeairlines all devs and moderators are western. They probably wouldn't mind anything anti-communist. Also, I don't see how a flag can be offensive.
So, you do windows before you get to them with the fuselage plating. That's the part I was missing. I have already managed to make a semi-hollow decent looking cockpit for one of my WIPs using similar technique, but I'll try to remake it with your tricks.
It's hard to say, really. That plane looks chubby and unattractive, although it's technically great. Also, it's always builds that you hold in high regard yourself that underachieve on the site. I know that from experience. "I hate this build. It doesn't look right, it doesn't work as well as I'd like, but I have worked too much to just scrap it. So I'll post it.". The build proceeds to score over 100 upvotes, three times more than my second best at the time. I upload a build I'm proud of, and it flops.
Only thing we need for boat building are better fuselage options (concave fuselage, twisting the fuselage). It would allow us to spend fewer parts on hulls. We can already make everything you mentioned except for arresting cables. Do you really think devs would waste time adding a helipad you can make out of two or three parts?
Grammar, buddy, grammar. The word you are looking for is "you're". Also, "soccer" is actual football. American football is a derivative of rugby, which itself is a derivative of actual football.
Very nice. Only thing I would edit is setting max deflection angle of elevators to around 27°. That way, you'll avoid elevator stall at max input. That problem is easy to miss on a mobile device, because you have on-screen controls. On PC, keyboard input makes it obvious.
I recommend using standard ground vehicle controls. That's pitch for acceleration and roll for turning. With throttle input, you don't have reverse, and yaw doesn't allow you to use partial input on PC.
@Tank6376 I have a decent variety of armored vehicles you can choose from. I never make replicas of real ones. This is a scout vehicle, meant to seek targets for artillery and tank units, so its armament is only for self defence.
You should maintain quality and keep improving. That ship is, indeed, nice. But many of your other builds aren't. Popularity comes with consistent quality. Also, join Discord servers and communicate with people. That will get you friends who will help you get better, and who will see your builds. You can join the biggest SP Discord server from my bio, as well as a dedicated shipbuilding server Port SP.
Make one. Put a missile on the wide side of detacher, attach a fuselage body to the REAR of the detacher, nudge it together, and launch like normal missile. Keep in mind that detacher will fly with the missile, so nudge it inside after you connect the missile to the plane.
@RamboJutter the way is removing excess drag via "dragScale" and "calculateDrag". Then you need much weaker engine to reach the speed. That engine will take more time to beat inertia of the plane.
Nice work. It looks good and flies well. But maybe install a weaker engine and remove some drag? It accelerates like a rocket.
Try to make the cockpit frame somewhat smoother. Other than that, nice plane.
+1EDIT: never mind. I missed the part where you say it's T7.
@Baldovino good thinking.
+1Old engine, huh? I haven't seen that one in ages.
+1Very cute :)
@Bdidi no. I have rushed this build. Next plane will have it (if it's a plane that kinda looks like An-72. I'm not sure which one I'm going to upload next).
+1@Tengam for sonobuoys I couldn't install due to the lack of activation groups.
+1@Chancey21 this bird was an inch of getting scrapped, as I have already made a much better plane. I just wanted to kick it onto the site so it doesn't go to waste. And because I don't want to convert that better plane into maritime patrol aircraft with ugly radomes and MAD probe poles. This is, in my opinion, how a low gold player should build.
+1@Dllama4 sure you can. Just not on the first try. It took me two years and around fifty scrapped attempts.
@Dllama4 that was fast. Thanks :)
You may also want to use a gyroscope to keep it stable until aerodynamic surfaces become effective.
Your CoM must be in line with CoT. Incase of space shuttle, CoT must be directly below CoM, with very little margin for offset.
@Sgtk no problem.
An 835 part fan?! Don't build the rest of the plane, you'll bring down the site.
+18@Tully2001 no problem.
@Tully2001 follow the URL from a third comment from the bottom.
We need something to play with until they add weapons and other important things to SR2. SR2 will probably be a bit too basic at the start.
+1Andrew said it won't have them initially. However, it's one of the most popular requests, and adds far more versatility to the game. So, we can expect it on one of the updates.
+4It's a bit rough in some places, especially around doors. Other than that, excellent build.
+2It's Cthulu. Game code calls him that. After Lovecraft's series about a similar god-like creature.
It's nice. It has details, and flies well. But why no ailerons? I mean, there are hidden ones, but I don't see anything moving on the trailing edge of the wing. In my opinion, that's a big minus. Especially with so many simple techniques for custom wing with mechanical control surfaces all over the site.
Man, I haven't heard that song in ages. Nice plane :)
@Comradeairlines all devs and moderators are western. They probably wouldn't mind anything anti-communist. Also, I don't see how a flag can be offensive.
+2@BlyatMan I'm busy with a few of my own builds and some real life stuff. And interiors have never really been my thing anyway.
@RamboJutter no problem.
This is too nice to go unnoticed. Have a spotlight :)
AG2 extends the mast. You can look through the camera and rotate it with the same input as for the gun. AG2 also opens a satellite antenna, @Chancey21
@Chancey21 I'm really glad you enjoyed. Have you checked out parking brake and camera mast?
1 block/unit is 0.5m.
+1@goboygo1 you can adjust both the UI size and icon size. Use mod setting mod by HellFireKoder.
@Tank6376 there should be a few of those already on the site. Use search feature. It's in the "Aircraft" drop-down menu.
So, you do windows before you get to them with the fuselage plating. That's the part I was missing. I have already managed to make a semi-hollow decent looking cockpit for one of my WIPs using similar technique, but I'll try to remake it with your tricks.
+1It's hard to say, really. That plane looks chubby and unattractive, although it's technically great. Also, it's always builds that you hold in high regard yourself that underachieve on the site. I know that from experience. "I hate this build. It doesn't look right, it doesn't work as well as I'd like, but I have worked too much to just scrap it. So I'll post it.". The build proceeds to score over 100 upvotes, three times more than my second best at the time. I upload a build I'm proud of, and it flops.
+4Only thing we need for boat building are better fuselage options (concave fuselage, twisting the fuselage). It would allow us to spend fewer parts on hulls. We can already make everything you mentioned except for arresting cables. Do you really think devs would waste time adding a helipad you can make out of two or three parts?
+4Grammar, buddy, grammar. The word you are looking for is "you're". Also, "soccer" is actual football. American football is a derivative of rugby, which itself is a derivative of actual football.
+5Ugh, here's my rant...
+3@realluochen9999 no problem.
Make a boat.
Very nice. Only thing I would edit is setting max deflection angle of elevators to around 27°. That way, you'll avoid elevator stall at max input. That problem is easy to miss on a mobile device, because you have on-screen controls. On PC, keyboard input makes it obvious.
+2I recommend using standard ground vehicle controls. That's pitch for acceleration and roll for turning. With throttle input, you don't have reverse, and yaw doesn't allow you to use partial input on PC.
+2It's much better now.
@Tank6376 I have a decent variety of armored vehicles you can choose from. I never make replicas of real ones. This is a scout vehicle, meant to seek targets for artillery and tank units, so its armament is only for self defence.
Top speed is way too high. Other than that, quite a nice ship.
You should maintain quality and keep improving. That ship is, indeed, nice. But many of your other builds aren't. Popularity comes with consistent quality. Also, join Discord servers and communicate with people. That will get you friends who will help you get better, and who will see your builds. You can join the biggest SP Discord server from my bio, as well as a dedicated shipbuilding server Port SP.
@TheBoeingEngineer no problem.
Make one. Put a missile on the wide side of detacher, attach a fuselage body to the REAR of the detacher, nudge it together, and launch like normal missile. Keep in mind that detacher will fly with the missile, so nudge it inside after you connect the missile to the plane.
@Meepmaster87 no problem :)
The story is amazing too. How long did it take you to write it?
@ChiChiWerx no problem.