247k EternalDarkness Comments

  • M.Corp C-2 Taurus 7.0 years ago

    @SaiShu I'm glad you like it, buddy.

  • M.Corp BOV-X Boar 7.0 years ago

    @temporaryaccount lol

  • Proteus 7.0 years ago

    I like this design. Enough details to keep it interesting, but still SD style.

    +6
  • M.Corp C-2 Taurus 7.0 years ago

    @randomusername I know how to edit fuel consumption. I just found this consumption to be pretty fine.

  • M.Corp C-2 Taurus 7.0 years ago

    @randomusername I didn't want to overdo fuel. Let's say tanks aren't full. I was aiming for a 500km flight. Also, it's meant to be flown at 85% power at 5000m.

  • M.Corp C-2 Taurus 7.0 years ago

    @randomusername that's unusual. I flew it Avalanche - Maywar a few times during testing. Try redownloading it.

  • M.Corp C-2 Taurus 7.0 years ago

    @randomusername you have to keep some speed and come in shallow. Fuel shouldn't be a problem, as it has massive hidden weightless fuel tanks, I think. They might have gotten lost before upload, but nobody else complained about this problem. At what altitude did you fly?

  • A special suprise 7.0 years ago

    This post has been removed for breaking rules. It is far too off-topic and potentially insulting.

  • f 22 raptor striker slamer 7.0 years ago

    @Chickenbut56 it's not a big problem. New users like you often make that mistake. I wish you a long and enjoyable stay in this community.

  • [Question] Slowest Aircraft? 7.0 years ago

    If we eliminate all VTOLs, lighter-than-air craft, and other "cheaters", my bet is on Dornier Do-29. It was a partial tiltrotor STOL aircraft with minimal controllable speed of just 24km/h.

    +1
  • f 22 raptor striker slamer 7.0 years ago

    This plane is breaking the copy rule. It's not enough to just rearm or repaint a build to upload it. Please read rules. Unfortunately, I have to remove it. You should try building your planes from scratch. It's far more rewarding.

  • T-14 Armata (2 Year Special) 7.0 years ago

    @Dllama4 no problem.

  • T-14 Armata (2 Year Special) 7.0 years ago

    @Renovator why did you tag me?

  • Mod help 7.0 years ago

    I don't think I can help. I haven't had that problem.

  • Le Grand Mort 7.0 years ago

    @Hyattorama no problem.

    +1
  • Le Grand Mort 7.0 years ago

    Very nice. Use tags.

    +2
  • M.Corp Banhammer SSMS 7.0 years ago

    @LotterCrafts thanks for pointing it out. It's fixed now.

  • Fa-223 Focke-Achgelis 7.0 years ago

    Excellent build. Great job.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @tsampoy I've created Futuristic tag. I don't think I've changed now that I'm a mod. Except for the fact that I can ban people now :)

    +1
  • No Engine Challenge (Not A Glider Challenge) [CLOSED] 7.0 years ago

    @Watlel you don't wanna offer a winning prize that big. What if I win? I have a lot of planes. And there are users who have even more.

    +1
  • Vans RV-12 single seater 7.0 years ago

    @CALLSIGNNOODLE you can make better trailing edges if you use fuselage inlets. Flip an inlet onto the side, point the open end backwards, and edit its width to zero. That'll give you a sharp trailing edge, and you can use inlet angle to make trailing edge not parallel to the leading edge.

  • Q and A with EternalDarkness 7.0 years ago

    @xXRaindropXx it's a monarchy holding most of Africa and Southeast Europe. It owns all strategic resources and manufacturers of strategic goods and military equipment on its territory.

    +2
  • Vans RV-12 single seater 7.0 years ago

    Nice build, especially for a relatively new player.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @EliteArsenals24 they are all Parts.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @EliteArsenals24 give me an example on which I can create tag.

  • OPD Sheriff 7.0 years ago

    Check tags.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @EliteArsenals24 would "contraption" do? I think "gizmo" would be easily confused with "gizmo" tab of parts.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @SledDriver or just use a built-in system. It's easier.

  • B-24 D [42-72843, no. 24, Strawberry Btch] 7.0 years ago

    Mention history of this example to justify the livery please. Great build.

    +2
  • EternalDarknes Dragon 7.0 years ago

    lol thanks

  • Vote 7.0 years ago

    @CALVIN232 thank you.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @Mattangi2 they are most basic vehicles. But I'll consider tagging them too.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @Rodrigo110 all wheel drive is related to off-road tag I've already created. I can't make a tag for everyone. I'll consider the cargo tag.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD added. Check tags on your Mercedes bus in your highlighted planes.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD would public transport tag suffice? I don't think there's enough busses or trams to necessitate a tag. But combined, they just might.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @temporaryaccount what am I supposed to do? As long as they aren't breaking rules, they are fine.

    +3
  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @BaconAircraft added.

  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @LiamW added.

    +1
  • Regarding Tags 7.0 years ago

    @temporaryaccount it already exists.

  • B-24 D [42-72843, no. 24, Strawberry Btch] 7.0 years ago

    @Chancey21 if that is a historic livery kids can see in a museum, I won't remove it. Alternately, you can switch the "B" with "W".

    +3
  • Vote 7.0 years ago

    @CALVIN232 I think you should take a break. Recharge your batteries, get some new inspiration, regain motivation... Deleting account is like demolishing a bridge you've just crossed. There's no turning back. I advise against doing that.

  • *FULL COCKPIT* Vickers Wellington Mk.III Coastal Command 7.0 years ago

    This is a great looking build. However, it has some problems. Trim up is required to keep the plane level, but it prevents opening of bomb bay. Nose is constantly trying to go up. Also, use tags. That way, your plane stands a chance of being stumbled upon by someone browsing, for example, "Bomber" tag.

    +4
  • J-10(Eggy) 7.0 years ago

    @FENRIRpapapa why tag me? I'm following you, so your build automatically shows in my jet stream. Btw, try to egg a ship.

  • M.Corp Banhammer SSMS 7.0 years ago

    @Minecraftpoweer I knew someone will be childish enough.

    +5
  • TEAM DEATHMATCH CHALLENGE COMING UP 7.0 years ago

    @jollyJoey my job is to enforce rules. Yours is to follow them. I'm not threatening, but informing you where your current behaviour will lead if continued. Your current behavior is annoying others, and I'm guessing it doesn't make you any happier either. Finally, both of your stikes have been noted and are accessible to all moderators. That means any one of us can ban you next time you cross the line. Have a nice day.

    +3
  • TEAM DEATHMATCH CHALLENGE COMING UP 7.0 years ago

    @jollyJoey your comment has been removed due to violating rules. Consider this a warning. Gather three of these and you are banned. This is your second one.

  • TEAM DEATHMATCH CHALLENGE COMING UP 7.0 years ago

    @Hexcorpz your comment has been removed due to violating rules. Consider this a warning. Gather three of these and you are banned.

  • M.Corp Banhammer SSMS 7.0 years ago

    @SPCWorkshops here you go

  • F-16(Eggy) 7.0 years ago

    @FENRIRpapapa no problem. Very simple build, but very cute.

  • Weird... 7.0 years ago

    Gotha had to get featured. It's quite amazing for a first build. It would even be great for a gold-level user. The other biplane is also very well made. I'm generally not into such old planes, but quality is quality, and both builds could use some more attention.