@L0NGSW0RDPIL0T no, and no. Mobile friendly version would get rid of most of the functionality, and jamming electronics of SP is difficult, as there aren't any electronics to be jammed. You could use a hidden countermeasure launcher, but I don't see a point of that, as nothing locks onto this anyway.
@NightfallFlyers indeed, it takes time to learn all the tricks. If you need advice, you can ask here or find me on one of Discord servers linked in my bio.
@DeathStalker627 one is of camera passing by the system, the other one of system being deployed. If you have tested the build, you aren't missing anything. Only reason I can imagine for you not seeing gifs is the hosting site being blocked in Turkey.
@blackvultureaeroespace airborne systems are susceptible to nuisances like SAM, fighters, and other anti-aircraft things. Ground based installations can't fall :)
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck orbital bombardment via tungsten rods wouldn't be effective, which is a reason why it doesn't exist. It would do small amounts of damage and would have exorbitant costs per launch.
We've had worse upvote dry seasons caused by bad weather. So what if a few users are leaving? We still have plenty. There's also plenty of us still building for fun. I've had literally all ranks I can get without working for Jundroo including a rare and hard to get Mod rank, and I'm still going.
I know you haven't made this post with a bad intention, but it is still against the rules. You shouldn't mention being blocked by someone. I suggest finding Gestour on Discord and asking him there.
I finally got around to testing this build. I really like the airfoil and details. However, I think it is far too maneuverable, and accelerates like a bullet. To have realist acceleration and realistic top speed, find and use parts with disabled drag. To have more realistic turning, reduce size or deflection of control surfaces.
Your post has been removed, as it is a copy of its predecessor. For a successor build to be approved, it must provide significant improvement over the original, or at least be sufficiently different.
To use Cleaver as an engine, you'd have to make your plane a fuselage of a custom weapon and launch your plane after getting a lock onto a target. You'd launch it as a standard Cleaver. It should be possible to prevent Cleaver to turn towards the target on its own via XML.
A bit of color diversity wouldn't have killed you. Other than that, I like it.
First :)
+1@LancasterAce lol
@DeathStalker627 I've noticed it has fewer upvotes than I'd expect, so I did what I can to help :)
@L0NGSW0RDPIL0T no, and no. Mobile friendly version would get rid of most of the functionality, and jamming electronics of SP is difficult, as there aren't any electronics to be jammed. You could use a hidden countermeasure launcher, but I don't see a point of that, as nothing locks onto this anyway.
I agree with @GritAerospaceSolutionsLTD.
+4@PyrusEnderhunter lol. I'm glad you like it.
@SwiftAirTM thanks.
@NightfallFlyers :)
@NightfallFlyers indeed, it takes time to learn all the tricks. If you need advice, you can ask here or find me on one of Discord servers linked in my bio.
@UniverseAndSea I'm glad to hear that. Thanks.
@DeathStalker627 Great Leader Erdogan is happy that you are enjoying it XD
@NightfallFlyers wow, thanks.
@NightfallFlyers I'm glad you like it buddy.
+1@jamesPLANESii they were made for me by Vincent. Big thanks to him.
@DeathStalker627 one is of camera passing by the system, the other one of system being deployed. If you have tested the build, you aren't missing anything. Only reason I can imagine for you not seeing gifs is the hosting site being blocked in Turkey.
@KRAYTEK999 thank you for the few you gave :)
+1@blackvultureaeroespace oh. Most broadcasts go via cable these days anyway.
@blackvultureaeroespace I'm not sure I understand. Land-based EW systems are a thing.
@blackvultureaeroespace airborne systems are susceptible to nuisances like SAM, fighters, and other anti-aircraft things. Ground based installations can't fall :)
@SimpleNerd I don't know. maybe turn it into SAM platform?
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck orbital bombardment via tungsten rods wouldn't be effective, which is a reason why it doesn't exist. It would do small amounts of damage and would have exorbitant costs per launch.
@tylerdeveneuxmusic @Spitfirelad05 I'm glad you like it.
@8bitgamer33 struts were meant to just keep the vehicle in place. I didn't want them to fully separate it from the ground.
@Mick1234567890 :)
Great job. This is one of the best flying helicopters I have used so far. Best vertical landing I have ever performed.
+2No problem.
Your post has been removed as it is a copy of its predecessor. Copying planes is against the rules of this community.
Step 1: release quick, unremarkable build;
+6Step 2: whine about community dying when community doesn't find it remarkable;
Step 3: profit.
@Supercraft888 and for design? XD
Just kidding, no problem.
@flyingsteve88 no problem. It's an amazing build.
We've had worse upvote dry seasons caused by bad weather. So what if a few users are leaving? We still have plenty. There's also plenty of us still building for fun. I've had literally all ranks I can get without working for Jundroo including a rare and hard to get Mod rank, and I'm still going.
+5@Gravity no problem. I chat with Gestour every now and then, so it wasn't much of a bother.
Nice plane. However, diameter of the prop is too large, forcing the upper wing to be too high.
+2@TheMlgKing feel free to modify this build as you want. Just make sure to make enough changes, so it doesn't get removed as a copy.
@TheMlgKing it got stuck so many times I just couldn't keep remaking it. I'm glad you like it.
@Gravity you have been unblocked. Gestour says he might have done it by accident.
I've had that problem too. I don't know if it can be fixed.
I know you haven't made this post with a bad intention, but it is still against the rules. You shouldn't mention being blocked by someone. I suggest finding Gestour on Discord and asking him there.
@Rub3n213 there are many such parts on my builds. Usually wing covers. Take them if you want, no credit needed.
I finally got around to testing this build. I really like the airfoil and details. However, I think it is far too maneuverable, and accelerates like a bullet. To have realist acceleration and realistic top speed, find and use parts with disabled drag. To have more realistic turning, reduce size or deflection of control surfaces.
@JED T-100 is Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master renamed for the contest, and M-346 is a development of Yak-130 with Western engines and electronics.
T-100 was refused for the sole reason of actually being Yak-130 XD
Your post has been removed, as it is a copy of its predecessor. For a successor build to be approved, it must provide significant improvement over the original, or at least be sufficiently different.
No problem, @Stingray.
@WarHawk95 that's the old way. It is rather unreliable, but it could work.
Nice post. Congrats on one year.
+3To use Cleaver as an engine, you'd have to make your plane a fuselage of a custom weapon and launch your plane after getting a lock onto a target. You'd launch it as a standard Cleaver. It should be possible to prevent Cleaver to turn towards the target on its own via XML.
Why not devote it to brave man who died on both sides? It's not their fault their side lost.
+4@oliveCLONE600 you can delete one of the previous planes to make room for a new upload, or wait 24h. It's not the end of the world.