@TheUltimatePlaneLover
That plane woefully overpowered, and has, for all intensive purposes, infinite countermeasures. I thought such aircraft where agreed to be no longer used. >:(
Am I going to have to bring back missile invulnerablity?
@windshifter1
I'm going to make a more balanced version of my Gleipnir, which will have the following new traits:
1. no stealth (no aircraft that big could ever have stealth.)
2. Increased vulnerability (the plane in-game had weaknesses, as do real aircraft).
3. greatly increased Shock Cannon load time(again, in-game, the cannon took considerably time to charge, so now mine will.)
All other aerial warships will have similar traits: balanced weapons, and limited high health, and no unfair advantages.
@windshifter1
Basically everyone seems to want more balanced weapons, and I while I still want my really big planes, I don't want to be rude and still use overpowered stuff.
.......Although Skypark as not ratified this treaty(and won't), we do believe in limited restraint, plus the upkeep of such weapons that are classified as "overpowered" or "meme" is an unacceptably expensive process. As such, while we will still produce and develop such things as aerial warships, they shall not unbalanced in their capabilities.
Example A: Gleipnir type AW shall no longer be equipped with the costly stealth technology. Gleipnirs in existence will have their stealth systems removed.
@Noname918181
I don't seem to remember taking part in that treaty......... oh wait, I didn't.
(Ok for real, I'm planning on making the next aerial warships more balanced, not the mention Gleipnir is still vulnerable to explosions, and, like in the game, it's a sitting duck in close-range combat)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Just let me know when you're about to make the next official update, and I'll tell you if anything of note is happening on my part as regards the war.
I'll also tag you whenever I make my independent updates.
@OrangeConnor2
No, but the recently unveiled Junkers J.1000 should have ample room for mines. Plus, being an airliner, it's not even military, so who'd notice?
@OrangeConnor2
Well, I suppose nuclear escalation may not be a economic decision, I must say. After all, it doesn't actually make sense to use a several million dollar bomb on eels. Mabye just drop a fat shark from a B-36 into the area and call it a day.
I'd be happy to join this little eel-based cat fight. Mostly just so I use nukes on snakes' electrified ripoff. And any excuse to make combat aircraft. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
@AWESOMENESS360
Question: how do get such massive aircraft to flying correctly? I tried making a huge plane(after the J.1000) and the wing parts wobbled so much stable flight was impossible. So I'm curious how you accomplished it.
Well, you can look through my posts for fighter aircraft, but if you're looking for whole new planes, I'll get on that once my entry for a challenge is done.
@FOXHOUND26
Probably, yes.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
I can overlook the absurd amount of weapons if you give it more reasonable countermeasures.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
That plane woefully overpowered, and has, for all intensive purposes, infinite countermeasures. I thought such aircraft where agreed to be no longer used. >:(
Am I going to have to bring back missile invulnerablity?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Which?
@windshifter1
I'm still deciding who I'll be fighting.
@windshifter1
I'm going to make a more balanced version of my Gleipnir, which will have the following new traits:
1. no stealth (no aircraft that big could ever have stealth.)
2. Increased vulnerability (the plane in-game had weaknesses, as do real aircraft).
3. greatly increased Shock Cannon load time(again, in-game, the cannon took considerably time to charge, so now mine will.)
All other aerial warships will have similar traits: balanced weapons, and limited high health, and no unfair advantages.
@windshifter1
Basically everyone seems to want more balanced weapons, and I while I still want my really big planes, I don't want to be rude and still use overpowered stuff.
.......Although Skypark as not ratified this treaty(and won't), we do believe in limited restraint, plus the upkeep of such weapons that are classified as "overpowered" or "meme" is an unacceptably expensive process. As such, while we will still produce and develop such things as aerial warships, they shall not unbalanced in their capabilities.
Example A: Gleipnir type AW shall no longer be equipped with the costly stealth technology. Gleipnirs in existence will have their stealth systems removed.
@Noname918181
I don't seem to remember taking part in that treaty......... oh wait, I didn't.
(Ok for real, I'm planning on making the next aerial warships more balanced, not the mention Gleipnir is still vulnerable to explosions, and, like in the game, it's a sitting duck in close-range combat)
I hope you don't intend to escalate things, sir. Otherwise we may need to finally enter this conflict.
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 is the WAEC Navy really that big a danger?
Luckily for you, good sir, we at Skypark are actively preparing for war, so you may just get your war.
Well, I've made my own update that's somewhat tied to the official one(s).
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Just let me know when you're about to make the next official update, and I'll tell you if anything of note is happening on my part as regards the war.
I'll also tag you whenever I make my independent updates.
Mind if I give input for this war? Both in your official updates, and My own independent posts? As an active observer, I am involved to a degree.
Let me know of any issues.
You may want to check out my latest teaser(hint: it's related to that shock cannon)...
What fun, I too am planning something.
Skypark is planning on sending reconnaissance YB-60s over the battlefields at high altitude to monitor the events taking place there.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
I can build a base, if that will give my nation legitimacy
"no military presence", ha >:(...
@CrestelAeronautics
And just WHO do you think you're invading?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@plane634 😮
Maybe I can get involved in an SP conflict! I've been without a combat challenge for too long now.
This, little conflict, is it only in this video, or is it an ongoing project?
👍😮👍
My fictional country based on the skypark island South of Wright Island.
I'm in.
@Graingy
Oh!
For a minute there I was worried.
Wait, it that......an eel?
@Graingy
Well, yes, that's why it has landing gear. It's supposed to start off on the ground, then get to altitude.
@OrangeConnor2
No, but the recently unveiled Junkers J.1000 should have ample room for mines. Plus, being an airliner, it's not even military, so who'd notice?
@OrangeConnor2
I suppose you have a point there.
Fun.
@OrangeConnor2
Well, I suppose nuclear escalation may not be a economic decision, I must say. After all, it doesn't actually make sense to use a several million dollar bomb on eels. Mabye just drop a fat shark from a B-36 into the area and call it a day.
Nice.
I'd be happy to join this little eel-based cat fight. Mostly just so I use nukes on snakes' electrified ripoff. And any excuse to make combat aircraft. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
@AWESOMENESS360
Question: how do get such massive aircraft to flying correctly? I tried making a huge plane(after the J.1000) and the wing parts wobbled so much stable flight was impossible. So I'm curious how you accomplished it.
😆👍
Well, you can look through my posts for fighter aircraft, but if you're looking for whole new planes, I'll get on that once my entry for a challenge is done.
Pretty unique.
👍😀👍 Really nice.
Out of curiosity, have you tried spending more time on your tanks to increase their quality?
What th-?
You realize it's almost twice the size of the actual GvK Mechagodzilla, right?
👍👍
HONK
🙂👍
Sound fun, I'll try it.
@AndrewGarrison
Outta curiosity, do you know what's going on with the site right now?
@Ilovewillow
Sure, go ahead.
@kitkatof
Indeed, it was rather odd.