Profile image

[M-War] Skypark updates #2 + Teaser

20.9k Dracul0Anderson  one month ago

The Aerial fleet is preparing for something big, and it's not just the arrival of Support ships that will soon be ready. Four of our Gleipnir AWs are docked just offshore, while SAW Hati keeps an eye on the events of Snowstone.

imagename
imagename

Meanwhile, our scientists have been developing a new fighter aircraft, to compliment our Discus and Chakram aircraft. Taking off from a drone carrier, they may see combat sooner then anticipated....
imagename

More at 11:00

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1
    The captured sub appears to be a liberator. Skypark scientists are still studying it.

    29 days ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @Dracul0Anderson Due to the hurricane, it is likely Cruisers will be withdrawn.

    29 days ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @Dracul0Anderson Ah, submarines of old, sure. Now they are always escorted by the Predator Class submarine and often by Liberator Class Cruisers on the surface

    29 days ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1
    This may be of concern for you, and your new submarines.

    29 days ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1

    Termination of Skypark neutrality is imminent.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1 precisely
    the exact reason the Flying T-34 is such a legend is because it shouldn't exist, but it flies because it doesn't care what humans think

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes haha

    lol the A-40B II is a masterpiece of power, the A-40S is the epitome of "heck no"

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Sorry, but kinda. It just cant work due to the invisible wings

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1 Confirm though, does everyone hate Flying T-34?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1 lol the A-40B II is a masterpiece of power, the A-40S is the epitome of "heck no"

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover The A-40 II, yes. The one with tanks attatched? No.

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1 ok so what I'm actually hearing is that everyone hates Flying T-34

    but if you're saying it like that, does that mean even the A-40 could technically still fight?

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @Dracul0Anderson Ok just let me know if you join us.

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1
    I'm still deciding who I'll be fighting.

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1 I see

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @Dracul0Anderson Thank you for complying! Welcome to the war efforts! Shall I add you to the MGLA private discussions yet or are you still considering?

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @windshifter1
    I'm going to make a more balanced version of my Gleipnir, which will have the following new traits:
    1. no stealth (no aircraft that big could ever have stealth.)
    2. Increased vulnerability (the plane in-game had weaknesses, as do real aircraft).
    3. greatly increased Shock Cannon load time(again, in-game, the cannon took considerably time to charge, so now mine will.)
    All other aerial warships will have similar traits: balanced weapons, and limited high health, and no unfair advantages.

    one month ago
  • Profile image
    10.7k windshifter1

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover @Noname918181 @Dracul0Anderson The treaty banning unrealistic builds seems to be confusing for some. Just to let you know, this does not ban any aircraft that does not resemble existing designs - It just means it has to have an explanation for how it works and would very likely work in real life. A flying tank with no visible wings obviously is unrealistic. But an aircraft made from salvaged tank parts, maybe with some tank features still visible like the turret, that would be allowed. It has a good story, and if well designed it would propably work in real life. That is creativity and realism combined. Please keep this in mind.

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image
    11.7k derlurje

    @Noname918181 @Dracul0Anderson just got the plane to deal with this

    Anyone willing to procure a few?

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    @Noname918181
    I don't seem to remember taking part in that treaty......... oh wait, I didn't.

    (Ok for real, I'm planning on making the next aerial warships more balanced, not the mention Gleipnir is still vulnerable to explosions, and, like in the game, it's a sitting duck in close-range combat)

    one month ago
  • Profile image

    has treaty about the removal of unrealistic weapons
    Finally having a fair fight in the war
    Gleipnirs are joining the war
    Gleipnirs are joining the war

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    I am having second thoughts about my recent Withdraws, but everyone on both the MGLA and Monarchii sides seem to heavily approve of it, so I'm sorta pinned there I guess... better get to work on yet another super weapon...

    +1 one month ago
  • Profile image

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover

    +1 one month ago