That's a creative way to fix the pitch for sure, keep up the good work. I always like to do a couple flights between airports with a design to make sure the handling feels good but also isn't too unrealistic
Nice work, see if you can do something to make the text on the plane look better (not floating next to the fuselage), also the vertical stabilizer text overlaps the control surface. It also needs more pitch authority
@BigAeroplane it does not have to exist on the SImplePlanes website, I only mentioned that because it can be something already made in SP, but doesn't have to be. In fact it is probably better to not modify an existing build in SP, you can, but you don't have to.
@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII idk may be just me but if you apologize for breaking the rules that doesn't change the fact that you broke them, especially when you apologize only after you were found out. Just for the sake of fairness that should be treated the same way as if any other user did that, and that's not even considering the fact that he apparently did it again afterwards as @BaconAircraft says
@ChamDel78 as is extensively written in the description, yes. The starting design doesn't have to be a cargo plane, it can be military or something else, creativity counts
@NobleMobileUser yes, but doesn't have to be. You could modify an existing SimplePlanes design, but I'd rather not have you do that to someone else's build without their permission, due to the successor rules of the challenge. Besides you are better off building something completely on your own since if you are just modifying something pre-existing the judgement will be stricter (as a lot of work was already done for you)
@NobleMobileUser the original aircraft design you want to modify can be literally anything (within reason), it can be a real aircraft, a real design that was never built, completely fictional, etc, it doesn't have to exist as an SP build. It just has to be something designed prior to the challenge
that may be doable, if the engine goes over a certain thrust and you keep it there for too long i can think of a way that may disable it or reduce its power, but its probably going to be without any special effects
If your bio is correct and ".. no upvotes .. no models... simple" is your motto, then I'm sorry to say it but you leaving the community and uninstalling SP is for the best.
I understand your frustration but in the end the upvotes don't do anything for you, if the reason you play the game and invest effort into it is only to chase fake internet points then just don't play the game.
Downloading without upvoting is perfectly fine and nobody should be made to feel bad about it. If you do see a plane you like and upvote it, then good for you, but if you don't it doesn't really matter. If you were leaving negative non-constructive comments instead, that would be an issue, but just not upvoting something is fine.
The SP servers will go down sooner or later and erase all of your points anyway, at which point all the time you invested into the game would become completely wasted if all you were after were those points.
That's a creative way to fix the pitch for sure, keep up the good work. I always like to do a couple flights between airports with a design to make sure the handling feels good but also isn't too unrealistic
Nice work, see if you can do something to make the text on the plane look better (not floating next to the fuselage), also the vertical stabilizer text overlaps the control surface. It also needs more pitch authority
@Numbers2
thats called a Mac
I swear to god if there is no native Linux support i will literally
@ColonelCanada not something you just randomly get
@CanadianAircraftBuilder combining the disadvantages of both and advantages of neither
Amazing, exactly what I was looking for, thanks for entering
@BigAeroplane it does not have to exist on the SImplePlanes website, I only mentioned that because it can be something already made in SP, but doesn't have to be. In fact it is probably better to not modify an existing build in SP, you can, but you don't have to.
@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII idk may be just me but if you apologize for breaking the rules that doesn't change the fact that you broke them, especially when you apologize only after you were found out. Just for the sake of fairness that should be treated the same way as if any other user did that, and that's not even considering the fact that he apparently did it again afterwards as @BaconAircraft says
@Boeing777x also thank
my Raspberry Pi Zero W can only handle 13 parts hope thats ok
@ChamDel78 as is extensively written in the description, yes. The starting design doesn't have to be a cargo plane, it can be military or something else, creativity counts
@IDNSatyaBUKANNova that can, I meant that you can't just completely reupload something without changes
@IDNSatyaBUKANNova it has to be a new build/mod for the challenge, I should have mentioned that in the rules, I'll add it now
@NobleMobileUser yes, but doesn't have to be. You could modify an existing SimplePlanes design, but I'd rather not have you do that to someone else's build without their permission, due to the successor rules of the challenge. Besides you are better off building something completely on your own since if you are just modifying something pre-existing the judgement will be stricter (as a lot of work was already done for you)
Exactly the kind of submission I was looking for, thanks for entering the challenge
@NobleMobileUser the original aircraft design you want to modify can be literally anything (within reason), it can be a real aircraft, a real design that was never built, completely fictional, etc, it doesn't have to exist as an SP build. It just has to be something designed prior to the challenge
@beenz indeed the Bush plane is one of the planes ever made
@V i will proceed with the rituals necessary to summon the andrew and get the evil deed done
@FoxtrotCharlieCharlieX thank
@CR929thenewSPplayer that was definitely an inspiration and to an extent justification to make it
@TheFlightGuySP thanks brother
@ColonelCanada he made the bush plane, I made THE Bush Plane
know the difference
i can help you make objectively worse planes if you want
( ͝סּ ͜ʖ͡סּ)
@Erc90F4RU what
take the random ID and put it in the description of the youtube video that you want to verify
that may be doable, if the engine goes over a certain thrust and you keep it there for too long i can think of a way that may disable it or reduce its power, but its probably going to be without any special effects
can you do my bush plane
nice
awesome, maybe work on the handling a little though
nice build, a bit nose heavy so it could use trim
fun to fly
this is entirely my doing you are welcome
(https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/fFP606/MQ-9-Reaper-UAV-CN1143)
(https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/fx1bt9/Boeing-E-3-Sentry-AWACS)
@thefalkenreich i agree with that comment
@KeijunKaij plane
Can you make a plane that
@F1849 da,mn
is this a drone
cool
@rexzion it sucked
no problem
why are you green explain yourself at once
@X99STRIKER this part was 11 months in development
If your bio is correct and ".. no upvotes .. no models... simple" is your motto, then I'm sorry to say it but you leaving the community and uninstalling SP is for the best.
I understand your frustration but in the end the upvotes don't do anything for you, if the reason you play the game and invest effort into it is only to chase fake internet points then just don't play the game.
Downloading without upvoting is perfectly fine and nobody should be made to feel bad about it. If you do see a plane you like and upvote it, then good for you, but if you don't it doesn't really matter. If you were leaving negative non-constructive comments instead, that would be an issue, but just not upvoting something is fine.
The SP servers will go down sooner or later and erase all of your points anyway, at which point all the time you invested into the game would become completely wasted if all you were after were those points.
nice im surprised someone is still using the airport mod
@BarrowAircraft no
@X99STRIKER at least four