Maybe it's because the last time I came on with you in the lobby, you lined up a triple collateral on me and 2 others and lagged the living daylights out of everyone in the server?
looks cool but there's a number of noticeable issues right off the bat.
1: The ailerons are broke and don't move with roll.
2: the landing gear is wayy too far back, you can sacrifice 4 missiles for correct gear placement.
3: Roll is too slow.
4: Above about 70% thrust the exhaust starts to look really funky.
5: When you turn off vector thrust while pulling up or down, the exhaust nozzles lock in that position.
6:The rockets you put on the tail can be fired? I'm not sure why you made them with rockets.
7: The hover mode is very strange and not that practical.
Overall, looks cool, but heres just some things you can improve on in future projects.
@randomusername Ok you're not the only one to have people make crappy successors of your builds. The difference in this situation is you let it get to you and acted out, which is what some people wanted. You have to either roll with it or not care at all, getting pissed off is absolutely the worst thing to do in these situations. Just because someone made a knock off of your build, that isn't indicative of that posts "quality". This happens to literally everybody on the site with a shred of attention.
I think the winglets are quite cool on the Airbus aircraft. Also, did the plane crash after this picture was taken? Seeings as the flaps are fully down and the thrust reversers are on
@PyrrhaNikos ah that is rather unfortunate, because that is definitely not a G model. Nonetheless, shape is good however you may want to turn collisions off of moving doors and stuff that sits in contact with other parts :)
Just lower the drag then you can in turn lower the engine thrust, currently the acceleration is insane, it takes off in a fraction of the time and irl 940m distance the real one needs. A potentially helpful tip I have is to lower the engine powermultipler while increasing the engines max value. I did that on my CF-105.
Maybe it's because the last time I came on with you in the lobby, you lined up a triple collateral on me and 2 others and lagged the living daylights out of everyone in the server?
+38/10, pilot likes to vibrate furiously when strapped for catapult launch, very funny.
+3???
+3looks cool but there's a number of noticeable issues right off the bat.
+31: The ailerons are broke and don't move with roll.
2: the landing gear is wayy too far back, you can sacrifice 4 missiles for correct gear placement.
3: Roll is too slow.
4: Above about 70% thrust the exhaust starts to look really funky.
5: When you turn off vector thrust while pulling up or down, the exhaust nozzles lock in that position.
6:The rockets you put on the tail can be fired? I'm not sure why you made them with rockets.
7: The hover mode is very strange and not that practical.
Overall, looks cool, but heres just some things you can improve on in future projects.
ah shoot, If I didn't spend money for 500 GE in War Thunder I'd have enough for SR2 :T
+3@jamesPLANESii Elitists? whomst?
+3Devil incarnate in War Thunder... Looks nice but it's the lunchbox so 3/10, good effort, should've built something not cursed :I
+3@MrSilverWolf I see no problems with that, liquids put out fires... right?
+3@randomusername Ok you're not the only one to have people make crappy successors of your builds. The difference in this situation is you let it get to you and acted out, which is what some people wanted. You have to either roll with it or not care at all, getting pissed off is absolutely the worst thing to do in these situations. Just because someone made a knock off of your build, that isn't indicative of that posts "quality". This happens to literally everybody on the site with a shred of attention.
Here's some examples:
+3This one
And this one
This one too
Another one
Yet another one
When you gotta speedrun the Turkey prep cause the family's showing up in 5 minutes
+3I can't seem to figure out where to find the 6 digit ID to paste into the original?
+3I think the winglets are quite cool on the Airbus aircraft. Also, did the plane crash after this picture was taken? Seeings as the flaps are fully down and the thrust reversers are on
+3@Gameboi14 Just please note, if you're gonna right an essay, please paragraph them so I don't lose my eyes, thank you :)
+3The Bee looks like a giant flying Scarab Beetle? Florida's wack I'm never going,
+3@RailfanEthan He Striketh down upon thee
+3You thought you were slick huh?
+3KMS Dresden Rises Kriegsmarine Intensifies
+3Should have given it a hat
+3"This is my first upload" I sense a lie hahaha, very nice work!
+3@CarlosDanger13 That ones so easy you can just take one of mien and paint them...
+3@CarlosDanger13 No
+3@CarlosDanger13 Camos like that are hard you can take a mustang and do it yourself just to prove my point :/
+3@CarlosDanger13 Lol your gonna ask everyone right? Hes not going to do it either sorry to say.
+3Lol you beat the last highest rated of all time in less than a month.
+3Mmmm yes my favourite UC grunt suit, if I can't find the PBandai version anywhere I can atleast have this
+2Words cannot describe the hate I hold for #3
+2WideBeast
+2idk what this is, but it looks very cool
+2Idk what you want us to do about that but
+2I approve of this tutorial
+2@Rework yeah but I don't want to, have a day.
+2@BeastHunter hehehehe
+2Why is the caution sign there what
+2it is done
+2Mmmmmm CF-18
+2this entire thing is illegal, we love it
+2@PyrrhaNikos ah that is rather unfortunate, because that is definitely not a G model. Nonetheless, shape is good however you may want to turn collisions off of moving doors and stuff that sits in contact with other parts :)
+2ok
+2@Aviator01 yeah, 4k 60fps on all major tv stations.
+2@SimplyPlain yes, I'm not quite sure how it works exactly but you are able to update the XML without making a new upload.
+2Oh no, anyway
+2Very clean looking ship :)
+2looks and flies pretty nice but it could look a lot better if you did away with the rounded circular trailing edges.
+2Just lower the drag then you can in turn lower the engine thrust, currently the acceleration is insane, it takes off in a fraction of the time and irl 940m distance the real one needs. A potentially helpful tip I have is to lower the engine powermultipler while increasing the engines max value. I did that on my CF-105.
+2@SheriffHackdogMCPE nah he assembled it himself so it won't break, he's Swedish so he gets a boost.
+2@RailfanEthan the sauce, hand it over
+2Y E S
+2looks nice but would look nicer if you didn't take the photo at dusk :P
+2I remember being ding donged by a Sturmpanzer after having everything disabled by a T95.
+2This unlocked a deep forgotten memory...
+2