Overall very decent build quality, it's nice to fly, the roll rate is a bit low but that's about it for the part count. Landing gear should be slightly angled :))
@RicardoAs1515 Yeah, in further testing I noticed the elevators were stuck, the two pieces at the edge of the elevators are fused to the horizontal stabilizer, some connection editing fixes the issue.
Just a technicality but IIRC, NATO naming convention dictates that names beginning with "F" are for Fighter Jets. This looks like something more like the TU-144 "Charger" and therefor would have to start with "C" :)
As of yet, I do think think there's any simpler way to make funky tree formulas. It's a pretty new implementation at the moment so I think they would try adding more content and fleshing it out before they make an easier way to make them, if at all.
Actually, Qin in Mandarin is pronounced like "Cheen" not "King", Yu is pronounced as such and not "E" so it would actually be more like "Cheeng-Yu-Jow"
@Vidal99977
@Brields95 They're all "legit", but are they all garbage and a clear degradation and dare I say insult of my work? Yes they are. It doesn't matter anyway because their knock off is not an indicator to my original builds quality.
Looks great, the cockpit is really well done. However it turns a bit too well I believe, and with the negative mass, the orbit camera is in a really odd and rather uncomfortable position. In the future I think you should try to build with lighter mass blocks from the start instead of decreasing weight later, or at least attach an orbit camera in the body to have a normal orbit view.
@KDS If you guys like playing as nations and stuff, there's a website called Backstabber.com where you can run a private game and replicate the first world war in Europe. Ive played it and it's pretty fun. You gotta work with other people and maybe backstab them.
Going off of what everyone else is saying, You want to get the shape of the build right before detailing. Detailing should be like an extra treat not the main focus here.
I really, really don't see the point of doing something like this, it's a game. I get all my real news by swiping right on my phone home screen. I'd imagine it's not that different for everybody else here. Doing something like this to "Boost points" is missing the point. plus forum upvotes are only worth 2 vs 15 for a build. Maybe don't post 4 forums a day and make something if you want to "Boost your points"?
@ProcessedPlAnEs I'm only in high-school so not really. Besides that, I have a Revell 1:48 CF-104 Starfighter kit I'm gonna build soon. Also got a school technical arts award for my work on a plane in 3D modelling. I'm trying to get a new telephoto zoom lens so I can get some pictures of planes at the airport and an airshow this summer, the'res going to be a P-47 and P-40 there I heard.
@JamesBoA To be honest, no clue? I'm only Duck by name. Had nothing to do with the whole "Ducc" thing, but it did convince me to spice up and personalize my profile picture a bit.
flame inbound
+1I made a super basic I-401 years ago but this is insane!
+1was this a filter or an actual drawing? either way looks nice
+1Overall very decent build quality, it's nice to fly, the roll rate is a bit low but that's about it for the part count. Landing gear should be slightly angled :))
+1@RicardoAs1515 Yeah, in further testing I noticed the elevators were stuck, the two pieces at the edge of the elevators are fused to the horizontal stabilizer, some connection editing fixes the issue.
+1This is a very beautifully made aircraft, it's quite fun to fly too, just a tad bit unforgiving :)
+1ChiChiWerx built an excellent F-20 Tigershark, which shares almost the same airframe as the F-5, Maybe give his a try to see how yours could fly.
+1@officialryanyang I've been playing this game for almost 5 years. I think I know how the missiles work.
+1@TheKraken3 That's realistic to the actual Avro Arrow IIRC, being a heavy interceptor designed in the late 50's
+1Just a technicality but IIRC, NATO naming convention dictates that names beginning with "F" are for Fighter Jets. This looks like something more like the TU-144 "Charger" and therefor would have to start with "C" :)
+1@Mustang51 @MrPorg137 @AV8R Thanks guys, hopefully there's more where that came from :)
+1@Gameboi14 No one thinks that.
+1@SkyCloudGaming weird, I've never had a problem, and others haven't had that problem so far.
+1isn't this just the FA-2 Fand II from Yukikaze
+1@TransDadGaming Most people don't like spending time listening to some guy mumble half the words to a song :)
+1@DuckMint I like this idea.
+1As of yet, I do think think there's any simpler way to make funky tree formulas. It's a pretty new implementation at the moment so I think they would try adding more content and fleshing it out before they make an easier way to make them, if at all.
+1@VVMC Hoping to have it out in a week or two, you can follow me if you want and get notified when I upload it
+1@NightmareCorporation Congratulations, you have achieved: Comedy
+1Actually, Qin in Mandarin is pronounced like "Cheen" not "King", Yu is pronounced as such and not "E" so it would actually be more like "Cheeng-Yu-Jow"
+1@Vidal99977
Dllama: Makes 10 teasers, doesn't upload.
+1@thefalkenreich @belugasub Enough, you're starting to cross the point into tasteless insulting. I won't accomplish anything at all.
+1@BlackhattAircraft They're truly something lol
+1@bjac0 Right??? Literally less than 10m apart and we had no clue hahahaha
+1@Brields95 They're all "legit", but are they all garbage and a clear degradation and dare I say insult of my work? Yes they are. It doesn't matter anyway because their knock off is not an indicator to my original builds quality.
+1@Subnerdica yes, that was very much my intention 100% ;)
+1@Gameboi14 Right, your mom called you to bed over an hour ago :)
+1That's a war crime right there.
+1Looks great, the cockpit is really well done. However it turns a bit too well I believe, and with the negative mass, the orbit camera is in a really odd and rather uncomfortable position. In the future I think you should try to build with lighter mass blocks from the start instead of decreasing weight later, or at least attach an orbit camera in the body to have a normal orbit view.
+1@F4f879 I'm looking forward to when you upload it lol
+1Adding on to what the other guy said, you can also have a gun that heals your parts lol
+1@ElonMuskOfficial Moderator tracks your IP
+1Now you have many holes in your wings.
+1So you know who's ok to talk to and who's not :)
+1@KDS If you guys like playing as nations and stuff, there's a website called Backstabber.com where you can run a private game and replicate the first world war in Europe. Ive played it and it's pretty fun. You gotta work with other people and maybe backstab them.
+1@KDS Damnnn, exposed hahaha
+1Looks and flies great, but the rudder seems to be inverted from the visual one?
+1Maybe make a Discord
+1Welcome back! Unfortunately, Hollow fuselages have the same hitbox as a regular one if I recall correctly.
+1@HarryBen47 Hey I think you spelled "are" with a "we'r" by accident!
+1Going off of what everyone else is saying, You want to get the shape of the build right before detailing. Detailing should be like an extra treat not the main focus here.
+1@Gameboi14 Have you considered the possibility that it's not that people aren't on?
+1Another Duck... Welcome.
+1I really, really don't see the point of doing something like this, it's a game. I get all my real news by swiping right on my phone home screen. I'd imagine it's not that different for everybody else here. Doing something like this to "Boost points" is missing the point. plus forum upvotes are only worth 2 vs 15 for a build. Maybe don't post 4 forums a day and make something if you want to "Boost your points"?
+1I'm saying this in the best way possible but, what the * * * *
+1No, I don't think I will
+1Canadian is the vastly superior choice here, no bias at all
+1@jamesPLANESii Got hit by a large Letter T when I was young, I've watched his videos a few times but not too into Bush Flying to have subscribed.
+1@ProcessedPlAnEs I'm only in high-school so not really. Besides that, I have a Revell 1:48 CF-104 Starfighter kit I'm gonna build soon. Also got a school technical arts award for my work on a plane in 3D modelling. I'm trying to get a new telephoto zoom lens so I can get some pictures of planes at the airport and an airshow this summer, the'res going to be a P-47 and P-40 there I heard.
+1@JamesBoA To be honest, no clue? I'm only Duck by name. Had nothing to do with the whole "Ducc" thing, but it did convince me to spice up and personalize my profile picture a bit.
+1