Mod DeezDucks Comments

  • Multiplayer Racing League 6.4 years ago

    @RailfanEthan Drive better lol

    +1
  • I was the first to rediscover the Wallace Giant Bee! 6.4 years ago

    The Bee looks like a giant flying Scarab Beetle? Florida's wack I'm never going,

    +3
  • Multiplayer Racing League 6.4 years ago

    I think you would attract more people if you let them make their own chassis as an option, they'd have to conform to the default cars main specs though.

    +1
  • Apology letter 6.4 years ago

    @RailfanEthan He Striketh down upon thee

    +3
  • One of the most underrated builds I’ve ever seen 6.4 years ago

    I think the largest problem with the build is the lack of good lighting, without clicking on it, I wouldn't be able to clearly tell the details of the aircraft. These days the first impression is everything when it comes to attracting views.

    +1
  • Something doesn't look right... 6.4 years ago

    According to the Sekrit Dokuments, all is as it should be, nothing is amiss.

    +1
  • New Build! 6.4 years ago

    Same comrade!
    <- This man has 5+ unfinished WIP's because he has procrastination 100 even though they're upload worthy builds.

  • Tracks 2: new tracks. 6.4 years ago

    Mmm so many opportunities

  • quack quack 6.4 years ago

    Did somebody call?

  • DDG-X-AntaresStrikeGroup 6.4 years ago

    Really good job here, the ship looks really realistic and there doesn't seem to be anything out of place.

    +1
  • Keep the comments and upvotes equal 6.4 years ago

    You thought you were slick huh?

    +3
  • Uh oh 6.4 years ago

    I think you mean 30 seconds my good sir

    +6
  • PZL-Mielec M-15 6.4 years ago

    Gottem, -10 seconds response time.

    +2
  • The World of Aviation Just Changed. (737 Crisis) 6.4 years ago

    It's not normal for two brand new planes to crash within 5 months but nonetheless I still have a lot of faith in the 737, Westjet is based in my city and 90% of their fleet is made of 737 models. Never had a bad plane related experience with them.

  • pew pew 6.4 years ago

    KMS Dresden Rises Kriegsmarine Intensifies

    +3
  • Also a Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @CrashFighter05 didn't work for imgur, turns out it works if you delete the s in https

  • Also a Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @Bearclaw189 @Zoomzoom999 @ChisP @Gameboy21 I don't remember the last time I did that but alrighty will do.

  • Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @FastDan he's a fat chunky boy

  • F-100 super sabre 6.5 years ago

    An inlet capable of swallowing entire worlds

    +2
  • Is it the parts count very important at all ? 6.5 years ago

    No not really, people like BogdanX make really accurate replicas on less than 400 parts, a good tip is to use rescaled stock parts to make details like panels and vents and whatnot.

  • Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @FastDan Says the guy with a bug pfp :P

    +1
  • Also a Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @Dllama4 dankeschön, Kamerad

  • Also a Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @Gameboy21 Imgurs garbage but I think it should work now

  • Also a Teaser 6.5 years ago

    @Notaleopard Damnit Imgur, stupid website

  • Teaser 6.5 years ago

    Kriegsmarine revival lol

    +1
  • G-force 6.5 years ago

    @stig27 I mean I never saw anyone use it for anything worse than a human cannon.

  • Here's a story about the Little Yellow truck that got kidnapped & drowned. 6.5 years ago

    @Othawne Square up, gimme like 2 months lol

  • Here's a story about the Little Yellow truck that got kidnapped & drowned. 6.5 years ago

    Vincent the serial Swedish carjacker.
    Also congrats on finally surpassing me haha

  • A-7 Corsair III 6.0 (1.8 patch) 6.5 years ago

    Ah so it was a ground attack aircraft
    At last! A worthy opponent! Our battle shall be legendary!

  • Mitsubishi T-2 6.5 years ago

    @IsaacHornblad go ahead lol

  • Tracks 2 coming soon... 6.5 years ago

    @MOPCKOEDNISHE so 11 is fine? :)

  • Tracks 2 coming soon... 6.5 years ago

    Would I be able to make Her Majesty's Churchill Mk III with this? Lots of little wheels on that

  • Republic P-47D Thunderbolt 6.6 years ago

    @otayahiromo8211 You do really good work and you shouldn't let other people "Rain on your parade" or so to speak, keep it up =)

    +1
  • Replica of my camera 6.6 years ago

    And here I thought it was going to be a Rebel T6 or something, but no you've suprised me. That's a rather lovely little Film SLR you have there.

    +1
  • Republic P-47D Thunderbolt 6.6 years ago

    @DankDorito They do good work, I believe that they should be rewarded in return. In my time before Platinum I only got featured once but that doesn't bother me, I myself didn't believe that my work after that until I reached Platinum met the mark for a feature.

  • Why the current system of our site is not fair. 6.6 years ago

    @Blue0Bull I was going to say the exact same thing! Your satisfaction shouldn't come from how many upvotes you get, you should be satisfied with what you're proud of. If you're proud of your work that should be the end of that, you should be building for your own enjoyment as much as it's for anyone who might download your work.

    +4
  • Republic P-47D Thunderbolt 6.6 years ago

    @DankDorito I agree with @ChichiWerx, it's very unprofessional to complain as such on someone else's post. About the example between the train and the Mig, while the train has much more parts, that's not all that goes into a build, you can also do an excellent job with little parts. for 188 parts, the Mig looks great for its part count, any random person could throw 700 parts at something but that won't mean it looks good. A great example of good use of little parts would also be BogdanX, his builds nearly always clock in at sub 400 parts but they all look excellent, great use of parts. At the end of the day you shouldn't be fretting over who gets how many upvotes, you should care about if you like your work or not. Your satisfaction shouldn't be based on how popular your builds are, if you're proud of your work that should be the end of that.

    +2
  • De Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk 6.6 years ago

    @randomusername The small part number on my old builds were largely due to my inability to do otherwise, I had a phone and couldn't get the details or accuracy that I wanted. Having a nicely detailed build was always in my mind, so now I can achieve the detail that I want so I'm not really planning on going back to the low part builds. I build according to how much detail I see fit anyway, it the plane only needs 400 parts then yeah sure I'm fine with that, but I'm not going to limit myself according to how many parts I think it should have. Making 400 parts last on a 134m long warship is hard anyway.

  • Announcing Winners (Bi-plane challenge) 6.6 years ago

    @Othawne anytime bby

  • De Havilland DHC-1 Chipmunk 6.6 years ago

    @randomusername Ooh very rare coming from me now

    +1
  • Announcing Winners (Bi-plane challenge) 6.6 years ago

    I'm pretty satisfied with my rank, thanks for hosting, was obviously a lot of work, absolute god hahahah

  • And You Think The Simpleplanes Upvote System is Broken? Look At This! 6.6 years ago

    Pretty sure it was to deter the flood of Jelly fans over a year ago, he told everybody to raid the site for some reason and chaos ensued.

    +8
  • Nice GA Challenge you got there, @EternalDarkness..... It would be a real shame if I were to crash it. 6.6 years ago

    I'm 100% sure that the 1000 part limit was made for you.

    +11
  • NS Freundschaft 2 6.6 years ago

    owo what's this?

    +1
  • 172 update 2 6.6 years ago

    @BaconAircraft certainly cares about the unimportant details lol

    +1
  • A very basic submarine Mobile Friendly 6.6 years ago

    @LOWEWAYY Yep go right ahead.

  • This is why I called myself AN2Felllla [Teaser!] 6.6 years ago

    The Soviet Union Air Freshener is the icing on the cake

    +6
  • [B&W] Junkers F 13 (Perfezione) 6.6 years ago

    No doubt NASA's computers can run Crisis, but can they run this??

    +2