I really believe that SimplePlanes Forums are literally the worst place to discuss this. This will only lead to further drama, hate and absolute idiocy.
If you do not agree with the way someone is behaving or can't agree with the morals of a joke due to whatever reason, just leave that server/conversation. The "cancel culture" in SimplePlanes that's been going on for the past couple days is cancerous and is the last thing one needs in an AIRCRAFT DESIGNING VIDEO GAME.
Tully2001 has also left all Discord servers and deleted his account from both SP.com and SR.com for reasons unknown.
@Poro I've spoken to Homemade, he is most certainly borderline depressed regarding the community.
I'm not going to join in on any existing conversations, but @AzureCorp, I implore you to delete this forum post. It's a breeding ground for chaos. Talk to Homemade in his DMs, don't make a forum post calling people monsters.
@NightmareCorporation I'm unaware, although, it's purely aesthetic for the way my build works. It's essentially one gigantic custom missile, and the "prop" starts working when the missile is "launched"
@BogdanX is right. Now that I look back, I believe I could've refined the build a lot more. It feels undercooked, unfinished. I'll keep all these pointers in mind for my next build and will ensure not to rush the upload.
@ChisP
@ChisP that's a rip. As for the flight performance, the plane mustn't exceed 5Gs in low speeds, therefore, if SP physics is accurate at all, this is how the plane actually handles irl.
Excellent, but as I said, please make it a successor of my plane and not this one.
@Blue0Bull I learn from the best.
+2@Rodrigo110 Ah, sounds excellent.
Not bad, but there are a lot of ways you could improve.
+8Aircraft pulls 34 Gs (not even at top speed)
Easily crosses sound barrier.
Nose gear doesn't completely retract.
Swastika is inverted on the left side of the aircraft.
@Frenchguyn666 Please ensure it is a successor of mine, the original variant else it will have to be reported for plagiarism.
Furthermore, please ensure it has substantial changes to the original variant and not just the colour.
At last! You're back!
Hm, I think "SavageZhou" might've been a better name, to be honest.
Nice three-pronged collaboration!
+2@Rodrigo110 You're back?!?!
+1Like you said,
wow big news NOBODY CARES
@Awsomur Indeed, and to be honest, I'd have been disappointed if it had.
@PETG No, Spiritus was banned for plagiarism and profanity (that middle finger thumbnail). It was entirely justified.
+1@Awsomur Usual Discord drama being dragged onto the forums, nothing unlike 2017, really.
+2"Logo"
+1Try using SP version 1.8
Don't forget cancerous "cancel cultures" regarding Discord drama spreading across an aircraft designing video game's website.
I really believe that SimplePlanes Forums are literally the worst place to discuss this. This will only lead to further drama, hate and absolute idiocy.
If you do not agree with the way someone is behaving or can't agree with the morals of a joke due to whatever reason, just leave that server/conversation. The "cancel culture" in SimplePlanes that's been going on for the past couple days is cancerous and is the last thing one needs in an AIRCRAFT DESIGNING VIDEO GAME.
Tully2001 has also left all Discord servers and deleted his account from both SP.com and SR.com for reasons unknown.
+4@typeZERO I might also make it if I feel I want a change from building planes.
@typeZERO I did say that I'm gonna remake it when I reach platinum.
@Alta2809 no, I was not.
Nein Nein Nein Nein!
@Zanedavid lol, yeah, the sound design lacks a lot, but oh well.
Yes, the German ball.
+3@typeZERO yes, that was made in SP 1.7; more than a couple years back. It's bound to be broken now, haha.
@typeZERO Yes, that would be me. I'll be remaking it whenever I reach Platinum.
@WIZARD2017 Yes, I had an account named
DarthAbhinavtwo and a half years ago which I had deleted.@UnmannedMaker Excellent.
@Dude32 You can't modify sound via. XML, unfortunately.
Could've added the terrain, then it wouldn't have been a circle with 92 parts mate.
You just didn't connect the cockpit. False advertising.
+1@Dude32 Yes.
@TheDerpingMemes Yes. Hello, again.
@Fei314 the nozzles add ~400 parts. Body + Wings are around 300-400. Details make up the rest.
Indeed. It has been released, by the way, @FLOWRIDER0.
@ChrisPy I wanted to, but I wanted to keep this a simple, minimalistic and ultra mobile-friendly build.
@Omel @MAHADI thank you!
+1@Mikey101234 no? The Fieseler Fi-103 is unmanned and is the equivalent of a WWII cruise missile.
The Fieseler Fi 103R Reichenberg is the manned version, which, by the way, I plan on making.
@theeunknown @ThePilotDude aye, haha. Thanks, guys.
@VVMC in 5 minutes from now.
Thank you.
@Poro I've spoken to Homemade, he is most certainly borderline depressed regarding the community.
I'm not going to join in on any existing conversations, but @AzureCorp, I implore you to delete this forum post. It's a breeding ground for chaos. Talk to Homemade in his DMs, don't make a forum post calling people monsters.
Yes! Finally!
Welcome to the club.
+1@NightmareCorporation I'm unaware, although, it's purely aesthetic for the way my build works. It's essentially one gigantic custom missile, and the "prop" starts working when the missile is "launched"
Ah, I see, @WarHawk95.
Also, I must've forgotten to remove the s from the thumbnail's url, I added that a couple minutes back.
@NightmareCorporation Yep, just did. I didn't know that was a prop.
You told me you were 13 three years ago, bruh. Regardless, congratulations, old friend.
Lmao, but to me, you'll always be Chingu-Joe.
+6The Fuhrer: NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN!
@MAHADI
@ChisP Certainly.
@Veronica no problem! Thank you for the upvote and spotlight.
+1@BogdanX is right. Now that I look back, I believe I could've refined the build a lot more. It feels undercooked, unfinished. I'll keep all these pointers in mind for my next build and will ensure not to rush the upload.
@ChisP
@4rshi
@232287168147825 great map 😉
@ChisP that's a rip. As for the flight performance, the plane mustn't exceed 5Gs in low speeds, therefore, if SP physics is accurate at all, this is how the plane actually handles irl.
@FuriousDream thank you.