14.0k ChrisPy Comments

  • Good Ol' Texas 5.6 years ago

    @AceOfSpade It doesnt matter if he LIKES Dr.Pepper lol

  • Good Ol' Texas 5.6 years ago

    You're in my state now!

    +1
  • Good Ol' Texas 5.6 years ago

    Yessssir

  • Update 1.9.205 5.6 years ago

    nice

    +2
  • Albatro Heavy Attacker 5.6 years ago

    So its a giant flying magazine, cool!

    +1
  • Mantis 5.6 years ago

    looks great but if cockpit visibility was a concern you would not be able to see out of the sides. lol

    +1
  • F4-C Phantom II 5.6 years ago

    Use the structural wings in XMl the part of is Wing-2 @CalebRepublic

  • Tu-144S teaser 5.6 years ago

    Wack@WIZARD2017

  • General Dynamics F-16C 5.6 years ago

    Oof idk sorry man@Mastermind1941

  • X 5.7 years ago

    it look so lumpy. you could probably simplify the hood right?

  • Tu-144S teaser 5.7 years ago

    i never understood how the drop nose heled it aerodynamically tho

  • F-16 Fighting Falcon PT F-16AM 5.7 years ago

    make ur own f-16

  • F-16 Fighting Falcon PT F-16AM 5.7 years ago

    bruh this be a ripoff of Ricardos not cool

  • Five-star Red Flag 5.7 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 yeah but you need the beta to run it only the Chinese government has that...

  • Steam Frigate "Obsidian" 5.7 years ago

    @EternalDarkness yeah you were the one who helped me out on my crappy f-16 about a year or two ago its where i got my start. I still haven't finished my JU-88 I never got that undercarriage quite right Ill prob end up posting it without the working cockpit and stuff RIP Ju-88

  • DF-17 'ThunderStorm' 2.0 5.7 years ago

    idk why but the nose is bothering me sorry lol

    +1
  • Steam Frigate "Obsidian" 5.7 years ago

    When your mentor is 10 upvotes ahead of you lol

    +1
  • Su-30SM 5.7 years ago

    potential right here people!

  • Su-30SM 5.7 years ago

    Tips:
    don't use nose cone it looks weird lol
    use the EternalDarkness' custom wing tutorials
    keep building

  • New Moderator 5.7 years ago

    @SupremeDorian cool beans

  • New Moderator 5.7 years ago

    TheFantasticTyphoon yeah you really have to watch him lol@SupremeDorian @TheFantasticTyphoon

  • New Moderator 5.7 years ago

    @WarHawk95 @BogdanX I think I have the right question.... What do you guys choose the mods? or Where do you guys choose the mods? BIG BRAIN

  • F4-C Phantom II 5.7 years ago

    @CalebRepublic NP

  • General Dynamics F-16C 5.7 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx thanks man btw I have made a t-38 talon testbed that ill tag you on it doesnt have custom wings or anything yet tho

  • BF-109 5.0 5.7 years ago

    Go ahead and delete your 4.0 version. Right next to the downloads hit the drop down and hit remove.

  • F4-C Phantom II 5.7 years ago

    @CalebRepublic you put wings inside the fuselage. You are going to make the rough shape of your wing with the structural wing and then scale it down to .1. You will then make rough sizes of your control surfaces and scale them down as well and connect those wings to the moving control surfaces. If you take a look inside my F-16s wings and control surfaces, you can see what I am talking about. You should do this after you make your airfoil shape

  • Sukhoi Su-35 5.7 years ago

    @Boatrider its easy to slap together wing parts it gets difficult to create control surfaces that look nice. The reason why good builders are good builders is that they go the extra mile

  • F4-C Phantom II 5.7 years ago

    @CalebRepublic link

  • F4-C Phantom II 5.7 years ago

    Not bad! next time try custom wings for a better airfoil shape. :)

  • General Dynamics F-16C 5.7 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx yeah but why do all these random people like reignsupreme get 150-300 upvotes on something that looks lumpy, not smooth, or not fully functional. Is it just because people are plat? randomusername got 97 upvotes on her jet that is ahead of mine. It doesn't even have custom surfaces and prob took her an hour. This took me 2 months! kinda upset if you couldn't tell lol.

  • Sukhoi Su-35 5.7 years ago

    @Trijets No, because they do not have a curve as an actual airfoil does. Not only does it look nicer but it also shows you have put in a lot of effort and time.

  • General Dynamics F-16C 5.7 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx I still think I should have gotten way more upvotes on this RIP

  • BF-109 4.0 5.7 years ago

    And yes wing area is almost always incorrect in SP. It sometimes will count some fuselage parts as well. IDK it's very weird

  • BF-109 4.0 5.7 years ago

    Very good! Great Airfoil especially for a beginner. Slight left roll and the tail is stuck but it's worth my spotlight for sure. Some plats cant even make an airfoil this good. If you ever need any help with testing replicas you can always mention me!

  • EF-45A NEMON 5.7 years ago

    well done!

  • Sukhoi Su-35 5.7 years ago

    looks great but there are no custom control surfaces

  • Northrop YF-23 Concept / 20k Special 5.7 years ago

    RIP should have used the YF-23

    +1
  • Dassault Mirage F1 5.7 years ago

    very smooth design and very well done, but yes control surfaces could be better. Also, maneuverability and acceleration should be much lower.

  • Republic F-105D Thunderchief 5.7 years ago

    very good!

  • The Messerschmitt ME-262 5.7 years ago

    Cool. But that nose tho

  • Rockwell B1-B Lancer V2 5.7 years ago

    Aww man you didn’t do a rotary bomb bay or custom weapons and no “custom” control surfaces also the acceleration is way too fast. ☹️ But overall very well done!

  • General Dynamics F-16C 5.7 years ago

    What physics are you running it on I can run it on medium physics on my phone and it’s an iPhone 8@Mastermind1941

  • Excavator 1.1 5.7 years ago

    @Notnoob1000 You sound like you are from Texas, my friend! "I got these down a place they call Tex-ass, This one is Des and this one is Troy and together they destroy" lol its from Thor Ragnarok

  • SEPECAT Jaguar GR.1 RAF 5.7 years ago

    @otayahiromo8211 yes at least the look of it is except for the intakes and some other stuff

    +1
  • Excavator 1.1 5.7 years ago

    Got 6 boxes of 6.5 Creedmore ammo in my garage. I don't think anyone will be messing around here lol. America!

  • B-1.5 Ghost Stealth Bomber 4.9 5.7 years ago

    Beautiful clean lines!

  • F/A-18F SuperHornet 5.7 years ago

    @Aviator007 less engine power and less drag is the way to go. look up the turn speed, the speed at sea level, and speed at altitude

  • SEPECAT Jaguar GR.1 RAF 5.7 years ago

    lol basically a su-25t

  • try transparent cockpit 5.7 years ago

    Yeah ur right hmmmmm@Pietro

    +1