Blue stripes on weapons certify they are dummy or practice. I've done a lot of research on that stuff and I've gotten that confirmed by multiple people who have worked as USAF ground crew. No need to be upset I have accidentally done it multiple times. In terms of the weapons being pointed, it's hard to get the curves right in SP anyways, the AIM 120C does follow the general curve you have but at the very tip it is rounded and not as sharp.
I think the reason why it doesn’t turn so well is because y’all used artificial surfaces. Sometimes it is better to have a wing in each custom control surface. The artificial surfaces scaled inside the wing sometimes just doesn’t work. My F-16 wouldn’t work when I used this method so I switched to wings in the control surface and it fixed the problem. Hope this helps... @edensk
Whoa nice. One thing flight model is unrealistic, when close to done tag someone to help you out or to test. However, for a silver this is exceptional.
Err I actually think you could do this before... unfolding demo we could have the covers pop off by attaching that to the small side of the detacher as well did that here
@QingyuZhou its people's nature to ask stupid questions and annoy the living sh*t out of you. Therefore with such an obvious answer, the question itself is a dumb question.I rest my case. lol
@CRJ900Pilot Thank you! Well, I am using newer techniques anyways, and I'm sure you could build a much better one now. Oof no one is spotlighting as they did on my f-16
@RamboJutter I tried my name is a typo. I contacted Andrew a while back but all the names I could come up with were taken by people who weren't active and had never posted a plane let alone commented on anything. It kinda sucks
Bruh REALLY?!
Lemme do this on my m-17 for some reason the detacher isn’t working
The right one doesn’t unfold
Actually this doesn’t even unfold every time
Gave me a good chuckle lol
Love it!!!!
I saw Texas Texas= Upvote
It’s a real plane but it is a fictional livery @SkyCloudGaming
+1Blue stripes on weapons certify they are dummy or practice. I've done a lot of research on that stuff and I've gotten that confirmed by multiple people who have worked as USAF ground crew. No need to be upset I have accidentally done it multiple times. In terms of the weapons being pointed, it's hard to get the curves right in SP anyways, the AIM 120C does follow the general curve you have but at the very tip it is rounded and not as sharp.
Not bad some of these weapons should have more rounded tips and some of the colors are off but generally well done!
Aight I’ve submitted mine you can specifically run it on medium physics right? @MAHADI
Lol 😂😂@Diloph
+1Np@edensk
+1I think the reason why it doesn’t turn so well is because y’all used artificial surfaces. Sometimes it is better to have a wing in each custom control surface. The artificial surfaces scaled inside the wing sometimes just doesn’t work. My F-16 wouldn’t work when I used this method so I switched to wings in the control surface and it fixed the problem. Hope this helps... @edensk
+2Good luck lol
+1Whoa nice. One thing flight model is unrealistic, when close to done tag someone to help you out or to test. However, for a silver this is exceptional.
This looks really good!
CoD MW lets goooooo
Yeah I can make one real quick I can probably just use this @Pilotmario
I’m actually super surprised this doesn’t have more upvotes I guess the site had low traffic today RIP
Just let me know if you need help with weapons in the future. The GBU-39s I made were actually first designed for the F-22@ReignSUPREME
You just use the attachments UI it’s definitely possible to do both at once@Pilotmario
Err I actually think you could do this before... unfolding demo we could have the covers pop off by attaching that to the small side of the detacher as well did that here
Bruh @KerlonceauxIndustries
+1Make min and max values something like 999999999999999 it’ll take a while to get to the end...
+3Huh there aren’t many people around today. Normally this would have like 50 or 60 upvotes by now today is kinda slow.@RamboJutter
Thanks @Trainzo @Hedero
@Vlad1k @nadvgia thank you
@QingyuZhou lol I go to a classical school so I do debates and stuff and this is how I use it lmao
@SchadeAircaftCompany np
@QingyuZhou its people's nature to ask stupid questions and annoy the living sh*t out of you. Therefore with such an obvious answer, the question itself is a dumb question.I rest my case. lol
+4you can only tag three people per comment btw
The question ur asking is a stupid question lol
@ACEPILOT109 Thanks
@CRJ900Pilot u good thank you btw
@CRJ900Pilot Thank you! Well, I am using newer techniques anyways, and I'm sure you could build a much better one now. Oof no one is spotlighting as they did on my f-16
@RamboJutter shoot i forgot to take a photoshoot with my Ju-88 I'm going to post some time
@RamboJutter I tried my name is a typo. I contacted Andrew a while back but all the names I could come up with were taken by people who weren't active and had never posted a plane let alone commented on anything. It kinda sucks
@TheFantasticTyphoon lol
Whoa this is pretty cool
+1@lilgreen06 IDK I have like 5 projects going on right now
Nice one, lump of meat,lol
+1That's racist! lol JK
@asteroidbook345 Facts, they would have dominated the air. They didn't make enough of these to matter though...
Thanks everyone! Sorry for tagging everyone in SP history. lol
Enjoy
@RamboJutter
@Tang0five
@RicardoAs1515
A worthy opponent @RamboJutter
This is pretty cool man! U should enter into snowflakes Funky trees challenge!
You've been tagged
@SodiumChloride
@Texasfam04
@TheMutePaper