I got that part, what I’m saying is that the 4 gyros aren’t even necessary and they degrade the handling. I have one just for yaw and that’s it. This is because normally, you have the rotors providing torque to turn the plane but in this case you need a yaw control so you need one gyro.
Try to steer clear of gyros on helicopters. While some can help in things like autopilot most of them do not help.
@BOXboy
Idea: V-280 but with jet engines instead of props. No wings so the engines would be close to the body and be tilted always.
I know I’m kind of a genius lol jk
She doesn’t fly bad but she doesn’t necessarily fly great either. To remove the strafing you need to make sure all torque scalars are 0 on the rotor. Also, most ppl don’t know this but helicopters DO have trim. You can accomplish this by going into the pitch input and putting in Pitch+(Trim/4)
@SCP1471 doesn't look bad just make sure your weight, wing loading, and thrust specs are correct when you finish. If the length is a bit off you can always scale it up a bit.
@shipster The A-10s are way too vulnerable to be used in contested airspace. We would risk way too many casualties if we did that. If they went in with F-35s they would be the only tracks on radar anyways. If we want wild weasels well just use the Stand in Attack Weapon on the F-35 which is in development and mount them externally and internally.
They are trying to replace the A-10s role with the F-35. The A-10s mission envelope no longer includes what we call CAS because of its vulnerability to AA. Now they only do CAS when it’s against infantry.@shipster
Ik these weren't copies I’m saying a good percentage of Chinese aircraft are foreign designs which have been reversed engineered or licensed@asteroidbook345
@CharlesDeGaulle Ah someone who finally understands stealth hahaha. Most radar s at the time it was designed was still X band and I think most AWACS are KU band. Yeah because it needed to fulfill a bunch of requirements from different nations it became a plane which was a hodgepodge of ideas. Yeah, 3 Fords sounds ok and I think they are gonna refurbish some Nimitz's. But that's just some speculation on my part.
@CharlesDeGaulle I'm not sure you can compare Rafale's 1-meter cross-section to the f-35s .005-meter RCS. Yes, it's not invisible but you would need a very powerful ground radar to actually get a detect and even if you do you still won't be able to get a track until the F-35 is in visual range and by that point, he has already fired 6 AMRAAMS at you. Yes, Rafael clearly wins in a dogfight but head to head at BVR the F-35 is going to win.
The helicopter carriers are much more adaptable than a supercarrier and you can get more for your money on the helicopter carriers than with supercarriers. That's why the US is trying to transition to an overwhelming number of small carriers which are lighter, faster, and more adaptable than regular carriers. The US will probably keep 3-4 of the big ones but they are just too expensive for the navy at this point.
Yeah, the F-15 is pretty awesome, when I head to flight school I'm gunning for an F-15EX or some other fast strike aircraft. The F-22 is cool but it certainly needs some work and a better HMCS. The F-35 is currently a mess so I wouldnt want to fly it at least until the fix its current engine problem.
Boeing creates the recommended timetable for maintenance. Also the plane was built in 1995 so only 25 years. I believe they are supposed to operate for 30-35 before they need a complete overhaul. If Boeing did not compensate for accelerated degradation it’s their fault. If the airline didn’t follow the correct plan it’s the airlines fault. But I think Boeing does maintenance for some airlines.
@asteroidbook345
@MrShenanigans still easy
I won't tell you what tho cuz I'm gonna meta this thing out of existance
+1Oh man this is so easy to cheat
+1@asteroidbook345 @realSavageMan @ForwardUntoDawn
yo what about Blood on the Risers?
That one is my favorite
@Tookan
1 that was a 767-200
2 that's kinda messed up
+1Also, The gun is supposed to be 30mm and the design was actually very successful so I'm not sure why you are saying it's not.
Aight how bout y’all chill ladies
@MassiveSimurgh @realSavageMan
I’m just going to be honest. If you are going to build a replica actually try to make it fly like the real thing.
+3I took the gyros off and added a few more things would you like me to link you to it?@BOXboy
I got that part, what I’m saying is that the 4 gyros aren’t even necessary and they degrade the handling. I have one just for yaw and that’s it. This is because normally, you have the rotors providing torque to turn the plane but in this case you need a yaw control so you need one gyro.
Try to steer clear of gyros on helicopters. While some can help in things like autopilot most of them do not help.
@BOXboy
Nice but it is a bit hard to control set all the torque attributes to 0 on the rotors and it should be good
Yeah the new F-15EX should be around for the next 5 decades. I kinda want to fly this plane when I get in the air force
Idea: V-280 but with jet engines instead of props. No wings so the engines would be close to the body and be tilted always.
I know I’m kind of a genius lol jk
I think the cockpit isn’t supposed to be as tall but it looks great. I’ll flight test it later
+1Crap I forgot to do the numbering. I’ve been out of town and away from my computer so sorry bout that
+1Idk why you made this so complicated lol.
+2High load = bend
She doesn’t fly bad but she doesn’t necessarily fly great either. To remove the strafing you need to make sure all torque scalars are 0 on the rotor. Also, most ppl don’t know this but helicopters DO have trim. You can accomplish this by going into the pitch input and putting in Pitch+(Trim/4)
+1She looks really good except for the wide tail. Lol
+1It’s your rear skids on the x-15 they drag on the ground causing the b-52 to not be able to do anything @realSavageMan
+1I did it’s not working @realSavageMan
+1I can’t seem to take off the runway it just turns in circles
+2Facts@TriStar
+3Red has been ejected from the cockpit
+2@SCP1471 yeah, your weight is still way off. would you be ok with me helping you make a good flight model for this plane?
Its ok but it needs less control overlap.Also, you need to list your controls and the LG does not retract on this like the real Mi-35
@SCP1471 doesn't look bad just make sure your weight, wing loading, and thrust specs are correct when you finish. If the length is a bit off you can always scale it up a bit.
@SCP1471 Its actually easier to use a blueprint you don't have to guess on lots of stuff
@shipster They will be using F-15EXs for that role as well
@shipster The A-10s are way too vulnerable to be used in contested airspace. We would risk way too many casualties if we did that. If they went in with F-35s they would be the only tracks on radar anyways. If we want wild weasels well just use the Stand in Attack Weapon on the F-35 which is in development and mount them externally and internally.
Although longer band radars like that have a hard time obtaining a track and are normally just used on search radars and not utilized in track radars
So not rlly underrated
This is a dumb meme
Turns on Applause sign
Why aren’t you using a blueprint
They are trying to replace the A-10s role with the F-35. The A-10s mission envelope no longer includes what we call CAS because of its vulnerability to AA. Now they only do CAS when it’s against infantry.@shipster
+1We might just pick up some Rafale’s that would honestly be the best thing instead of building a new aircraft.
Ik these weren't copies I’m saying a good percentage of Chinese aircraft are foreign designs which have been reversed engineered or licensed@asteroidbook345
@CharlesDeGaulle Ah someone who finally understands stealth hahaha. Most radar s at the time it was designed was still X band and I think most AWACS are KU band. Yeah because it needed to fulfill a bunch of requirements from different nations it became a plane which was a hodgepodge of ideas. Yeah, 3 Fords sounds ok and I think they are gonna refurbish some Nimitz's. But that's just some speculation on my part.
reminds me of the F-135 jet engine. How I wish the F-35 had thrust vectoring
some of them are genuine knockoffs or copies of Russian or American craft. but stuff like the J-12 are cool
+1Although some are cool
bc most of them are Russian licenses
+1@CharlesDeGaulle I'm not sure you can compare Rafale's 1-meter cross-section to the f-35s .005-meter RCS. Yes, it's not invisible but you would need a very powerful ground radar to actually get a detect and even if you do you still won't be able to get a track until the F-35 is in visual range and by that point, he has already fired 6 AMRAAMS at you. Yes, Rafael clearly wins in a dogfight but head to head at BVR the F-35 is going to win.
The helicopter carriers are much more adaptable than a supercarrier and you can get more for your money on the helicopter carriers than with supercarriers. That's why the US is trying to transition to an overwhelming number of small carriers which are lighter, faster, and more adaptable than regular carriers. The US will probably keep 3-4 of the big ones but they are just too expensive for the navy at this point.
Yeah, the F-15 is pretty awesome, when I head to flight school I'm gunning for an F-15EX or some other fast strike aircraft. The F-22 is cool but it certainly needs some work and a better HMCS. The F-35 is currently a mess so I wouldnt want to fly it at least until the fix its current engine problem.
clean and simple
+1i agree
@asteroidbook345 I know southwest works with Boeing and American might too
@asteroidbook345 i think maintenance is their own then
Yeah there are a lot of factors in this one. Was it an American Airlines or southwest? I can’t remember @FeiWu
Boeing creates the recommended timetable for maintenance. Also the plane was built in 1995 so only 25 years. I believe they are supposed to operate for 30-35 before they need a complete overhaul. If Boeing did not compensate for accelerated degradation it’s their fault. If the airline didn’t follow the correct plan it’s the airlines fault. But I think Boeing does maintenance for some airlines.
@asteroidbook345
Oh yeah sorry lol but Boeing is at fault for not doing more rigorous testing@asteroidbook345