@SheriffHackdogMCPE
Hi! I've planned in a few days make a post with a link, that link will contain the file with all the 2020 edition aircraft. Soon I'll have it ready and all those aircraft will be free to use.
@XAircraftManufacturer
I am making an update to most of the aircraft that I had available, some will not be republished because they were very old publications or they were not the adequate size in relation to the other aircraft.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
I try that my aircraft have the lowest possible number of parts but maintaining a design with a good amount of detail, this is also limited by the computer in which I create them, which is not high performance, basically I am limited to what the Vega 10 graphics can offer me. Despite the fact that they are all made in Windows, I test them in the mobile version as well, and so far there have not been any problems with performance. But it is true that this generation demands more in graphic resources than the previous one.
@AirplaneGuy3000
I'm not sure if I will continue to work on the older generation in order to better focus on the one that is developing.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
Each of the J30 line models will be published linearly, the NG and MAX will be published last.
@RedWasNotTheImposter
Thanks!
@x3Harrion
What makes it very heavy are the engines and fuel, I use up to 5 different types of engines, for thrust and for sound, and this last point is where the most fuel is consumed. That is what makes it very heavy, and when I tried to lighten the weight a bit, the aircraft reached negative weights when empty. It would be amazing if there was an option for the engine not to consume fuel, to use it in an ornamental way.
@Alta2809
I have decided to remove them temporarily so that they can be improved, as well as changing the names of aircraft so that they can be better organized.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer
Hello there!
Sorry for the delay...
I was busy with some High School stuff.
I hope that the proposal still in table, contact me by Telegram for more details.
Yeah, about the very small cockpit I had to learn the bad way. The first time I started using it, I finished with more than 700 parts. That's why I put it at the end, When I finished all the tests. I prefer to use with that size because I can be more precise when placing it so that parts of the fuselage do not cover the view of the pilot.
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
Note: Corrected a code problem in which the thrust reverser was activated in flight, causing the aircraft to lose speed and subsequently enter an unrecoverable stall.
@Hellohaveaniceday
Hi there!
Sure! The reason I publish it so quickly is because I had already done it a long time ago, this same model will replace AD-K10-100. Several of the planes that I will publish are already built, only some adjustments and their specification sheets are missing as well as their manuals and doing that takes time.
@XAircraftManufacturer
Thanks! I’m still figuring out how to! I’ve planned adding full cockpits but I still don’t know how much impact that would be in mobile devices.
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
I'm thinking about publishing the engines that I use on my planes, it will be credit-free to use, what do you think?
@Planeguy385
Hi there!
I use windows made out of fuselage with measures of 0.6 Width x 1 Height x 0.25 Length. This size of windows are perfect for 6.75 x 6.75 fuselages. All the windows should have a distance of 6.000Z between them, and a slight inclination to match the fuselage surface.
@TheKugelblitz
So you said that you have some difficulties with engine startup funky tree…
If you check out the internals of my engines you'll see that I use multiple engines:
• Thrust engine
• Reverse thrust engine
• Reverse thrust sound engine
• Engine throttle up sound engine
Some of this share the same code, and other use a modified code, depending the function.
What is your problem exactly?
@PapaKernels
I’ll try, but this is like a “house livery or factory livery”.
I want the thumbnails to be uniform, in my opinion it looks good like this.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+2Hi! I've planned in a few days make a post with a link, that link will contain the file with all the 2020 edition aircraft. Soon I'll have it ready and all those aircraft will be free to use.
Beautiful!
+2Good job!
+2@XAircraftManufacturer
+2I am making an update to most of the aircraft that I had available, some will not be republished because they were very old publications or they were not the adequate size in relation to the other aircraft.
Nice!
+1@EugeneDumDum
+1You must copy XML & BAK file of each aircraft to AircraftDesigns folder.
@PapaKernels
+1Thanks!
@XAircraftManufacturer
+1I guide with KingHandspider’s Airfield Charts, use the lines in the runway to calculate an estimated use of runway.
@TriStar
+1Thanks for your observation! Adjustments and optimizations are going to be applied to the final version of the aircraft.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
I try that my aircraft have the lowest possible number of parts but maintaining a design with a good amount of detail, this is also limited by the computer in which I create them, which is not high performance, basically I am limited to what the Vega 10 graphics can offer me. Despite the fact that they are all made in Windows, I test them in the mobile version as well, and so far there have not been any problems with performance. But it is true that this generation demands more in graphic resources than the previous one.
@AirplaneGuy3000
I'm not sure if I will continue to work on the older generation in order to better focus on the one that is developing.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
Each of the J30 line models will be published linearly, the NG and MAX will be published last.
@RedWasNotTheImposter
Thanks!
@x3Harrion
+1What makes it very heavy are the engines and fuel, I use up to 5 different types of engines, for thrust and for sound, and this last point is where the most fuel is consumed. That is what makes it very heavy, and when I tried to lighten the weight a bit, the aircraft reached negative weights when empty. It would be amazing if there was an option for the engine not to consume fuel, to use it in an ornamental way.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+1😂
@DreamsPilot
+1Wright Airport
@DPSAircraft
+1Thanks! It's amazing to have you back again.
@Alta2809
+1I have decided to remove them temporarily so that they can be improved, as well as changing the names of aircraft so that they can be better organized.
@DPSAircraft
+1Hi there!
It's wonderful to have you back!
@MSGamezYXZ360 @Mustang51
+1Hi there! You should check this post, where I explain better why I don't put cockpits in my planes, except for some models.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer
+1Hello there!
Sorry for the delay...
I was busy with some High School stuff.
I hope that the proposal still in table, contact me by Telegram for more details.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer
+1No, just a 767 😁
@DPSAircraftManufacturer
Yeah, about the very small cockpit I had to learn the bad way. The first time I started using it, I finished with more than 700 parts. That's why I put it at the end, When I finished all the tests. I prefer to use with that size because I can be more precise when placing it so that parts of the fuselage do not cover the view of the pilot.
Thanks for the tip ;).
+1@DPSAircraftManufacturer
+1Sure!
Nice aircraft, if you need help automatizing some control surfaces, my e-mail is at my bio.
@VinFage
@XAircraftManufacturer 👀
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
Note: Corrected a code problem in which the thrust reverser was activated in flight, causing the aircraft to lose speed and subsequently enter an unrecoverable stall.
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
@CanadianAircraftBuilder
Thanks!
@Hellohaveaniceday
I always try to keep the part count on my planes as low as possible, less than 600.
@Hellohaveaniceday
Hi there!
Sure! The reason I publish it so quickly is because I had already done it a long time ago, this same model will replace AD-K10-100. Several of the planes that I will publish are already built, only some adjustments and their specification sheets are missing as well as their manuals and doing that takes time.
@Hellohaveaniceday
Sure, I’ll try.
@XAircraftManufacturer
Thanks! I’m still figuring out how to! I’ve planned adding full cockpits but I still don’t know how much impact that would be in mobile devices.
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
I'm thinking about publishing the engines that I use on my planes, it will be credit-free to use, what do you think?
@Decembermin
Sure!
@Planeguy385
Hi there!
I use windows made out of fuselage with measures of 0.6 Width x 1 Height x 0.25 Length. This size of windows are perfect for 6.75 x 6.75 fuselages. All the windows should have a distance of 6.000Z between them, and a slight inclination to match the fuselage surface.
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
@TheKugelblitz
So you said that you have some difficulties with engine startup funky tree…
If you check out the internals of my engines you'll see that I use multiple engines:
• Thrust engine
• Reverse thrust engine
• Reverse thrust sound engine
• Engine throttle up sound engine
Some of this share the same code, and other use a modified code, depending the function.
What is your problem exactly?
@TheKugelblitz
I’m not a professional 😅, but I can help with what I know…
@TheKugelblitz
Sure! What's the problem?
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
This is a huge improvement
Well done!
@SuperLJY
OneDirve link has been added, now you should be able to download the files.
@ADAP
Thanks! I’ll try your advice.
@SuperLJY
I’ve added a Google Drive link, you should be able to download now!
If you have any doubts with aircraft operation, please leave a comment!
@ZhuYanYaoxiaozhu10187
Thanks for the advice! The problem will be fixed in the next variant of the aircraft.
@NotPoliteCat
Thanks!
@Boeing777x
Thanks! :D
@Spenzerointernational
Thanks!
@PapaKernels
I’ll try, but this is like a “house livery or factory livery”.
I want the thumbnails to be uniform, in my opinion it looks good like this.