0 Boeing777x Comments

  • Aerospatiale-BAC Concorde Singapore Airlines 5.1 years ago

    Looks really amazing, man. :) And by the way, would you like to build the A380Ultra in the future? The A380Ultra is a triple decker successor of the original A380 which has seating for 880 to 1060 passengers and would be powered by 4 GE9X engines. I'll let you think about it, and if yes, that would be a sight to behold. :)

    +1
  • Boeing 747-8F Cargolux 5.1 years ago

    @Panizon Because I just have too many other things to do. And spending time with my family is one of them.

  • C-353-500 5.1 years ago

    @CenturyAerospace I sure am.

  • C-353-500 5.1 years ago

    @CenturyAerospace Thanks. The reason why you won't build wide bodies could be that they would have way too many parts I assume.

  • C-353-500 5.1 years ago

    Whoa! This is one absolutely phenomenal build. I’m truly amazed by your plane designing skills, man. And do you plan on creating any large wide-bodied aircraft in the future? If yes, that would be amazing to see. And I already have some ideas. 🙂

    +2
  • The Boeing 707 will be right back! It is now time for our commercial break. 5.1 years ago

    Hello, it’s me again. Check this out. It’s the double decker propfan-powered Ar-460 by @Marine. It’s a really creative design idea IMO. Don’t you agree?

  • SkyWolf 485A 'Caribou' 5.1 years ago

    @MrSilverWolf No problem, bro. ;)

    +1
  • SkyWolf 485A 'Caribou' 5.1 years ago

    Truly an incredible build, man. Looks just like a real plane. I'm really amazed by your designing skills. Keep up the amazing work. :) ;) :D

    +1
  • Boeing E-3 Sentry 5.2 years ago

    No problem at all @Wallaby 😉

  • Boeing E-3 Sentry 5.2 years ago

    Truly a magnificent build just like everything else you make, my man. I am incredibly amazed by your designing skills. You truly make designing aircraft look very easy. Keep up the amazing work, bro. 😉

    +1
  • W320-3 Teaser #1 5.2 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo Sweet. ;)

    +1
  • W320-3 Teaser #1 5.2 years ago

    The W-320-3 here sure is gonna look really cool when it's finished. I'm honestly pretty excited for this plane. :) Oh, and my friend @DPSAircraft has recently hosted the Wright International Airshow, the biggest event in the history of SimplePlanes. Click here to check out its infromation for your self. You won't be disappointed. ;)

    +1
  • WF-X7 5.2 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo No problem, buddy. ;) It also looks simple and cool if I do say so myself.

    +1
  • Boeing 737MAX-8 Southwest (with MCAS) 5.2 years ago

    You my friend have done an extremely amazing job creating this beauty. It really looks like the real thing. I'm really proud of you my man. ;)

  • WF-X7 5.2 years ago

    To be honest, this build actually looks pretty cute if you asked me. 😊

    +1
  • WF-27A Teaser #1 5.2 years ago

    @OneTwo I certainly agree. This will be one epic fighter jet. 😊

    +2
  • Upcoming Project 5.2 years ago

    Hello, I was wondering. Once you finish your L-1011 Tristar, would you like to build double, triple, or even quadruple decker airplanes when you have the time? If yes, it would really be a sight to behold, because I really like gigantic airliners. 😁

  • C-121-400 5.2 years ago

    Any chance you'll do any wide bodied airliners in the future? Just a yes or no question. 😉

    +1
  • W-T31 Gray Star 5.2 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo ;)

    +1
  • W-T31 Gray Star 5.2 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo Okay. I'm looking forward to your double decker and supersonic jet as well. I think those will look really cool as well if you asked me. Don't you think? ;)

    +1
  • W-T31 Gray Star 5.2 years ago

    Hello, I'm back with a request to build a very large wide-body triple decker aircraft called the Altitus A-990 from NationStates. Below are its specifications.
    Length: 91 meters
    Wingspan: 98 meters
    Seating Capacity: 682 3-class, 1018 1-class
    MTOW: 655,000KG
    Range: 14,500KM
    Do you think that would be fun to build?

    +1
  • Royal Sovereign-Class Guided Missile Battleship 5.2 years ago

    @MDDJB Thanks. I'm glad you approve.

  • Royal Sovereign-Class Guided Missile Battleship 5.2 years ago

    @MarshallLewisAerospace Sounds great. I'm glad you like my offer. ;)

  • Royal Sovereign-Class Guided Missile Battleship 5.2 years ago

    @MDDJB I was actually just offering it to @MarshallLewisAerospace as a request.

  • Royal Sovereign-Class Guided Missile Battleship 5.2 years ago

    Hello, I have an idea for a new gigantic modern looking flying boat much bigger than your ML-422 pegasus flying boat. It would have 5 passenger decks, a cockpit in a similar position as the Airbus A380, and would be powered by 10 GE9X size engines. Does that sound awesome to you? 😀

  • [Another Teaser] Going Retro Part 3, Except This Time We Arent Because This is a Military Aircraft and the Military Loves Dinosaurs. 5.2 years ago

    @ForeverPie Indeed. And it was probably the largest 777 variant ever proposed.

  • [Another Teaser] Going Retro Part 3, Except This Time We Arent Because This is a Military Aircraft and the Military Loves Dinosaurs. 5.2 years ago

    Hello yet again, here's another fun fact: In 1999, Boeing once studied a further stretch of the 777-300X to 81 meters to carry 60-80 more passengers which would therefore increase the exit limit to 610-630 pax and make it a 747 replacement. Boeing abandoned that concept due to its length breaching the 80x80 limit for airports. Does that sound cool to you? :)

  • [Another Teaser] Going Retro Part 3, Except This Time We Arent Because This is a Military Aircraft and the Military Loves Dinosaurs. 5.2 years ago

    @ForeverPie Actually, first of all the 2x4x2 seating on the 797-900ER is actually of 19' premium economy which is wider than 18' standard economy. Therefore, the upper deck would have room for 3x3x3 standard economy seating. And secondly, the 797-900ER would have optional high density economy at 17', allowing for 3x6x3 seating on the main, possibly increasing the single class capacity to 1300+ pax.

  • [Another Teaser] Going Retro Part 3, Except This Time We Arent Because This is a Military Aircraft and the Military Loves Dinosaurs. 5.2 years ago

    @ForeverPie Oh no, not even close. The A380 is just 238 feet long, whereas the fan made 797-900ER I showed you looks to be much longer than that, possibly 290 feet or bigger. For a double decker like the 797-900ER to seat 800 passengers in 4 classes, it would have to be stretched at the to 290-300 feet.

  • [Another Teaser] Going Retro Part 3, Except This Time We Arent Because This is a Military Aircraft and the Military Loves Dinosaurs. 5.2 years ago

    @ForeverPie Indeed. I'm going to guess that the whole 797-900ER plane including the tail would be 300-310 feet in length, with a wingspan likely as wide as the fuselage is long at around 280-300 feet, a tail height of 90 feet, and would be powered by 4 GE9X engines. Do those sound like good estimates to you?

  • Boeing 747-8i Transaero 5.2 years ago

    Excellent work, bro. Do you think might plan to recreate the unbuilt 747-500X, 747-600X, and 747-700X in near future? If yes, that would be very cool to see. :)

  • [Another Teaser] Going Retro Part 3, Except This Time We Arent Because This is a Military Aircraft and the Military Loves Dinosaurs. 5.2 years ago

    Hello, I'm back. Check this out. It's a detailed fan made floor plan of the Boeing 797-900ER. What do you think?

  • W-T31 Gray Star 5.3 years ago

    Cool and sleek looking fighter jet you got there. ;)

    +1
  • WF-1A Air Superiority Fighter 5.3 years ago

    Looking sleek and fast. ;)

    +1
  • Boeing 747-400 Philippine Airlines 5.3 years ago

    Excellent work yet again! ;)

  • Airbus A380-800 Thai Airways 5.3 years ago

    Incredibly well done, bro. I'm extremely impressed. ;)

  • Boeing B707-300 (no mods!) 5.3 years ago

    You know it! 😆@SouthTunnel2

  • Boeing B707-300 (no mods!) 5.3 years ago

    I know right?! @SouthTunnel2

  • Boeing B707-300 (no mods!) 5.3 years ago

    No problem at all, my good bro! 😉@ForeverPie

  • Boeing B707-300 (no mods!) 5.3 years ago

    Wow! You did an absolutely phenomenal job at creating this old beauty! In fact, this could be the most accurate recreation of the Boeing 707 I have seen by far! I’m incredibly proud of you, bro! 😄

  • W320-1 Teaser #2 5.3 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo Sure. I'm good with that. ;)

    +1
  • [TEASER] Going Retro 5.3 years ago

    Alright. @ForeverPie

  • [TEASER] Going Retro 5.3 years ago

    Looking absolutely phenomenal. :D I know that I asked you this before but do you plan on doing the 747 family including the unbuilt variants after you revamp the 767 family? Just a yes or no question. ;)

  • W320-1 Teaser #2 5.3 years ago

    Hello, I'm back. I have an idea for a double decker aircraft if you plan to build one down the line called the W-380. The W-380 would be 94 meters long, with a 98 meter wingspan, and would have single class seating for around 1400 passengers with 14 abreast on main deck and 10 abreast on the upper deck. What do you think?

    +1
  • W310-2 (Wingworks Special Livery) 5.3 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo Cool. I actually like smaller narrow bodies as well as the larger wide bodies. Narrow bodies look pretty cool and some like the Boeing 737 are more sleek than the larger wide bodies, and others like the A321XLR can travel as far as some wide bodies but can carry less passengers.

    +1
  • W320-1 5.3 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo Yep.

    +1
  • W320-1 5.3 years ago

    I think winglets would look great. So, the answer would be yes. I say the A320 advanced/NEO sharklet winglets would be an excellent choice for the W-320-1 here.

    +1
  • W310-2 (Wingworks Special Livery) 5.3 years ago

    @WingworksDesignCo Okay. And will it be a narrow body or another smaller wide body?

  • W310-2 (Wingworks Special Livery) 5.3 years ago

    Hello again, I was wondering if you have plans to create a W-320 in the future. If you do, will it be larger or smaller than the W-310-2 here?

    +1