Wow! You did an absolutely phenomenal job at creating this old beauty! In fact, this could be the most accurate recreation of the Boeing 707 I have seen by far! I’m incredibly proud of you, bro! 😄
Looking absolutely phenomenal. :D I know that I asked you this before but do you plan on doing the 747 family including the unbuilt variants after you revamp the 767 family? Just a yes or no question. ;)
Hello, I'm back. I have an idea for a double decker aircraft if you plan to build one down the line called the W-380. The W-380 would be 94 meters long, with a 98 meter wingspan, and would have single class seating for around 1400 passengers with 14 abreast on main deck and 10 abreast on the upper deck. What do you think?
@WingworksDesignCo Cool. I actually like smaller narrow bodies as well as the larger wide bodies. Narrow bodies look pretty cool and some like the Boeing 737 are more sleek than the larger wide bodies, and others like the A321XLR can travel as far as some wide bodies but can carry less passengers.
I think winglets would look great. So, the answer would be yes. I say the A320 advanced/NEO sharklet winglets would be an excellent choice for the W-320-1 here.
@chibikitsune I certainly agree. @WingworksDesignCo here has immensely improved his airplane building skills in just over a month since he joined this community, which really impresses me. :)
I'm very impressed by not only how detailed, realistic and good this build is, but also by the fact that you really improved your plane designing skills in such a short span of time. I'm really proud of you, bro. :) ;) :D
Hello again, I was wondering if you happen to plan on making larger planes in the future with the largest seating an excess of 1300 passengers. If yes, that would be magnificent to see, because I have a thing for very huge airliners. ;)
@TheXDimension32 No problem at all, bro. 😉 Oh, and I was wondering if you might give the unbuilt 747-500X, the 747-600X and the 747-700X from the 1990s a go sometime this summer. If yes, that would be really cool to see because I’m personally a big fan of every variant of the Boeing 747, even the unbuilt ones. 😊
@XAircraftManufacturer Glad you like my list. And I kinda have to agree with you. The 60-70 seat turbo prop would certainly be the easiest plane on my list to do. And I think the other 6 I put on my list would be fun for pros and especially modders to build. And my list is in fact for anyone who has experience in building very detailed planes, specifically nfx1 here.
Hello, do you take requests? If yes, then I have a list of airliners that you could build in the future.
1. A super twinjet with an exit limit of 600-620
2. An 85 meter double decker with seating for 800-1000
3. A triple decker with seating for 1200-1800
4. An even larger mega twin with seating for up to 750
5. A double decker trijet with seating for 900
6. A small twin aisle jet like the Boeing 797
7. A 60-70 seat twin prop aircraft
What do you think?
I really have to say, this build is Incredibly fantastic. Everything about this build is amazing, from the fuselage, to the wings, the engines, the cockpit, and last but not least, the tail. Overall, I give this plane a perfect 10 out of 10. Keep up the great work, bro. ;)
Fun Fact: Boeing studied a shrink variant of the 777 called the 777-100 back in the 1990s. This planes designation is actually the same as that concept with the ULR part added.
Hello again. I heard that @Qingyuzhou might be planning to build a 777-10X in the near future. So I was wondering if you might do the same thing. The 777-10X is mostly the same as the 777-9X but is 263 feet long which is 12 feet more than the 777-9X. If you like my offer, that's great! :D
Looking sleek and fast. ;)
+1Excellent work yet again! ;)
Incredibly well done, bro. I'm extremely impressed. ;)
You know it! 😆@SouthTunnel2
I know right?! @SouthTunnel2
No problem at all, my good bro! 😉@ForeverPie
Wow! You did an absolutely phenomenal job at creating this old beauty! In fact, this could be the most accurate recreation of the Boeing 707 I have seen by far! I’m incredibly proud of you, bro! 😄
@WingworksDesignCo Sure. I'm good with that. ;)
+1Alright. @ForeverPie
Looking absolutely phenomenal. :D I know that I asked you this before but do you plan on doing the 747 family including the unbuilt variants after you revamp the 767 family? Just a yes or no question. ;)
Hello, I'm back. I have an idea for a double decker aircraft if you plan to build one down the line called the W-380. The W-380 would be 94 meters long, with a 98 meter wingspan, and would have single class seating for around 1400 passengers with 14 abreast on main deck and 10 abreast on the upper deck. What do you think?
+1@WingworksDesignCo Cool. I actually like smaller narrow bodies as well as the larger wide bodies. Narrow bodies look pretty cool and some like the Boeing 737 are more sleek than the larger wide bodies, and others like the A321XLR can travel as far as some wide bodies but can carry less passengers.
+1@WingworksDesignCo Yep.
+1I think winglets would look great. So, the answer would be yes. I say the A320 advanced/NEO sharklet winglets would be an excellent choice for the W-320-1 here.
+1@WingworksDesignCo Okay. And will it be a narrow body or another smaller wide body?
Hello again, I was wondering if you have plans to create a W-320 in the future. If you do, will it be larger or smaller than the W-310-2 here?
+1@WingworksDesignCo No problem at all. ;)
@chibikitsune I certainly agree. @WingworksDesignCo here has immensely improved his airplane building skills in just over a month since he joined this community, which really impresses me. :)
+1I'm very impressed by not only how detailed, realistic and good this build is, but also by the fact that you really improved your plane designing skills in such a short span of time. I'm really proud of you, bro. :) ;) :D
+1@WingworksDesignCo That's cool. ;)
+1Hello again, I was wondering if you happen to plan on making larger planes in the future with the largest seating an excess of 1300 passengers. If yes, that would be magnificent to see, because I have a thing for very huge airliners. ;)
+1Very impressive plane. In fact, I could actually see this beauty flying in real life if it was built. Keep up the great work, bro. ;)
+1@ALRX No problem, buddy. 😉
Magnificent and sleek plane.
Phenomenal. Looks exactly like the real thing. I'm incredibly proud of you, bro. ;)
@TheXDimension32 No problem at all, bro. 😉 Oh, and I was wondering if you might give the unbuilt 747-500X, the 747-600X and the 747-700X from the 1990s a go sometime this summer. If yes, that would be really cool to see because I’m personally a big fan of every variant of the Boeing 747, even the unbuilt ones. 😊
+1Wow! This build is really magnificent and very well detailed. I’m incredibly proud of you, buddy. 😉
@nfx1 Sounds awesome! And no problem, bro. 😉 Can't wait to see how they turn out. 😊
+1@XAircraftManufacturer Glad you like my list. And I kinda have to agree with you. The 60-70 seat turbo prop would certainly be the easiest plane on my list to do. And I think the other 6 I put on my list would be fun for pros and especially modders to build. And my list is in fact for anyone who has experience in building very detailed planes, specifically nfx1 here.
+1Hello, do you take requests? If yes, then I have a list of airliners that you could build in the future.
+11. A super twinjet with an exit limit of 600-620
2. An 85 meter double decker with seating for 800-1000
3. A triple decker with seating for 1200-1800
4. An even larger mega twin with seating for up to 750
5. A double decker trijet with seating for 900
6. A small twin aisle jet like the Boeing 797
7. A 60-70 seat twin prop aircraft
What do you think?
@MAHADI I know, right!?
I really have to say, this build is Incredibly fantastic. Everything about this build is amazing, from the fuselage, to the wings, the engines, the cockpit, and last but not least, the tail. Overall, I give this plane a perfect 10 out of 10. Keep up the great work, bro. ;)
+1@TU134 No problem at all. ;)
Looks pretty cool.
No problem.
@ForeverPie Good idea. I actually like the Boeing 767 series as well.
What a magnificent airliner. Looks just like the real thing. I'm really proud of you, buddy. What do you plan on building next?
Fun Fact: Boeing studied a shrink variant of the 777 called the 777-100 back in the 1990s. This planes designation is actually the same as that concept with the ULR part added.
+2@ForeverPie No problem at all bro. ;)
I have to say, you did really good job making the Lufthansa livery on your A340-600 in the last shot.
Sweet! I bet those photos are gonna look great. @ForeverPie
@ALRX No problem at all. ;)
@ALRX That's pretty cool.
@ALRX That's pretty cool.
What a really spot on impressive prop aircraft. :)
What an incredibly sleek and smooth plane you have there. :)
Hello again. I heard that @Qingyuzhou might be planning to build a 777-10X in the near future. So I was wondering if you might do the same thing. The 777-10X is mostly the same as the 777-9X but is 263 feet long which is 12 feet more than the 777-9X. If you like my offer, that's great! :D
@SkyCloudGaming I agree. That would be great. :D
+1@MrSilverWolf It was that long ago, huh? I don't know either.
@MrSilverWolf I'm gonna guess that the planes's wingspan is around 210-230 feet, is it not?