My iPad that used for everything broke 2 years ago when it was charging and someone stepped on the cord suspended between two desks. My iPad catapulted across the classroom and the screen shattered. I was able to bullshit my way to a replacement at the Apple Store.
We once had a fire in our room 317 science lab. Some grade nine thought it was a good idea to open the gas valve and put a burning splint in front of it. Let's just say things didn't go well for that kid...@ForeverPie
"All entries MUST be mount able on an AIRCRAFT. NO SCALE MODELS of guns or infantry weaponry, unless if it is at a 1:1 scale." Umm, what if it already include the aircraft/ propulsion system already?
@ChiChiWerx To be honest, I'm not surprised that this thread is being bombarded by other users. Infinite fuel does help airliner and larger aircraft builders like me or BaconEggs a lot due to the impractical aspect of realistic fuel without making it fly like a brick. I think people mainly use infinite fuel to reduce weight, improve flight characteristics and produce less lag once over 700 parts; which i see nothing wrong in. ...and I get why people may get triggered by this post due to that.
@ChiChiWerx I agree. Also realistic acceleration. I have to mod the engine power and MaxMin settings to make sure my 256 feet airbus a340 doesn't have the acceleration of a Mclaren p1.
I'm very guilty of using infinite fuel tanks. However, there just isnt enough room on some of my planes to add a realistic amount of fuel while still keeping the weight and flight characteristics untouched. Since most of my planes are high in part count, adding weight to each individual fuselage sometimes just isn't practical, and can turn the framerate down quite a significant amount due to the weight. For other aircraft, since they're designed to fly long periods of time (e.g. +4 hours-16hours), realistic fuel can be simply obligated. For example, on my current Airbus A340, the thing has a large enough fuel tank already, and is designed for long range, so why not use a two part infinite fuel tank. Also, explain how I'm ganna fit 204000 liters of fuel onboard.
.
Although I like this idea of yours of preferring realistic fuel levels, sometimes it's just impracticable for some people.
.
This is just my opinion.
@EliteIndustries1 Indeed you didn't.
On a side note, you don't intimidate me. However, if you're trying to annoy me and be a little prick, you're actually doing a good job.
@MrMecha ur drunk.
Mecha = Wheels lover
9000% info
NORAD approves @MrMecha
Creative!
It's connection points. Things like that tend to happen when you're working with scaled parts or rotated parts.
Wheels are superior @MrMecha eks dee
Delicious ex dee
Superb!
@AdrianFlyingAce 1100
Absolutely amazing!
Very unique aircraft. Nice replica. :)
@PaderiegeZ Indeed. I'm thinking of a narrow body airliner with the profile like that of the 787.
Nice plane!
Oh dear.. Do i need to release one of these narrow body airliners as well to compete? ...or should i stay out of this one?
My iPad that used for everything broke 2 years ago when it was charging and someone stepped on the cord suspended between two desks. My iPad catapulted across the classroom and the screen shattered. I was able to bullshit my way to a replacement at the Apple Store.
We once had a fire in our room 317 science lab. Some grade nine thought it was a good idea to open the gas valve and put a burning splint in front of it. Let's just say things didn't go well for that kid...@ForeverPie
Scale a really big one to 0.1x0.1x0.1 and put it in the very back, away from the COM.
Noice. Waiting for dat V/STOL variant :)
Idk why you didn't use the successor system...
1100 @Kentheman
@Kentheman Its 99% done. Just waiting on a some contribution from others to finish up.
The thing looks absolutely amazing and also makes really good target practice for guided bombs on multiplayer runways. :)
Noice
@Kentheman Of course, although note that building with this type of fuselage is quite dificult. MrSilverwolf and I are working on one as well.
@mushr0om To be fair, I do have to admit that it's a nice touch.
DAMN YOU MOD! I just got rickrolled by it.
@TheLatentImage Lol. #Feelsbadman
Mind if my thing is 20 parts over?
@TheLatentImage Rip. Feels bad how many times you have to click on Rick Astley daily.
I see a great builder here!
Well, not exactly, the "plane" is the bomb itself and the wings simply detach. I'll tag you on it to show u what I mean. @spefyjerbf
"All entries MUST be mount able on an AIRCRAFT. NO SCALE MODELS of guns or infantry weaponry, unless if it is at a 1:1 scale." Umm, what if it already include the aircraft/ propulsion system already?
HA! I just made one 2 days ago! Perfect.
I'm making the new acc. @ValtsuAircraftIndustries
If you have a computer, why are you asking me if lag is the issue. @landspeedcreator
Looks like minecraft
@landspeedcreator It sounds like you're getting me to do the entire exterior? Unfortunately I can't do that for you.
@Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing Look at my planes and figure out :)
@landspeedcreator What do you need help on exactly?
@ChiChiWerx To be honest, I'm not surprised that this thread is being bombarded by other users. Infinite fuel does help airliner and larger aircraft builders like me or BaconEggs a lot due to the impractical aspect of realistic fuel without making it fly like a brick. I think people mainly use infinite fuel to reduce weight, improve flight characteristics and produce less lag once over 700 parts; which i see nothing wrong in. ...and I get why people may get triggered by this post due to that.
@ChiChiWerx I agree. Also realistic acceleration. I have to mod the engine power and MaxMin settings to make sure my 256 feet airbus a340 doesn't have the acceleration of a Mclaren p1.
@TTHHSSSS That was the first thing i said as well.
XML mod and delete the line with the successor URL
I'm very guilty of using infinite fuel tanks. However, there just isnt enough room on some of my planes to add a realistic amount of fuel while still keeping the weight and flight characteristics untouched. Since most of my planes are high in part count, adding weight to each individual fuselage sometimes just isn't practical, and can turn the framerate down quite a significant amount due to the weight. For other aircraft, since they're designed to fly long periods of time (e.g. +4 hours-16hours), realistic fuel can be simply obligated. For example, on my current Airbus A340, the thing has a large enough fuel tank already, and is designed for long range, so why not use a two part infinite fuel tank. Also, explain how I'm ganna fit 204000 liters of fuel onboard.
.
Although I like this idea of yours of preferring realistic fuel levels, sometimes it's just impracticable for some people.
.
This is just my opinion.
Such A340, much beautiful, many wow
Much competition, such wow, many amaze.
Such self advertisement, much shame, many wow
@Sauce or copy the "ConHdE" in the url of https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ConHdE/55-Part-Challenge and press CTRL+L in game.
OMG! You're back!!! Eyyyy welcome back man!
@Tully2001 K good night!
@Tully2001 Yeah. Do agree. Got myself #TRIGGERED when someone claims a public tag as theirs.
@EliteIndustries1 Self realization is the best kind of reflection. Have a nice day.
@EliteIndustries1 Indeed you didn't.
On a side note, you don't intimidate me. However, if you're trying to annoy me and be a little prick, you're actually doing a good job.