@FasterThanLight
1. I'd recommend it being a successor so i dont lose your design and its easier to keep track of. However, if its not possible, dont worry.
2. Yes you can.
@Botfinder @MrSilverWolf Shoot. My newest version of the airliner has a thrust to weight ratio of 8.41... 16 engines but 12 are cosmetic, providing 0 thrust.
I hate it when people spend hours on end making (in most cases,) a great replica or original design but has horrifically unrealistic maneuverability or speed. E.g. a cessna 172 with the speed of an airliner and maneuverability of an f22
Bonjour, Hon hon hon hon. Funny thing is that learning French is mandatory up until grade 9 in Canada but I barely know how to speak a single sentence. Probably the only one I remember was "Puis je aller au toilet" or something along those lines. 😂
@Kazin Nah, no worries. xD I think at this point, most of us share the same opinion that the nasty stuff should of been kept in ones head and not just spouted out... well, if one can word it so it sound more nicely as in a proper piece constructive criticism rather than an insult, that's a different story.
"If you'd want my honest opinion, I don't really like it. Mainly because of performance, the 767 usually would rotate at around 160 knt which is around 180mph. Instead I went up at 230, and it couldn't even pitch up at 200mph. It also is very rough around some edges with the paint on it as well.
I also don't see the point in mentioning people if it's even worth it. I only click on things I'm interested in, and i only downloaded it to see how it would fly, not because it looked cool or anything."
"BaconEggs 3 May @ 12:45am
@bacon Because you think you’re infallible, you think the rules are for other people. You came after I did, now you have a higher rank out of blind luck, justifying you playing god. I had no choice, who I have on my friends list are people who actually understand the concept, not people who would be a complete dick on everything and think that it doesn’t have an impact at all. You didn’t care, you barely ever do."
Nobody asked for your negativity. Show some respect for the dude who actually spend his time to make the aircraft, and the livery. If you're ganna say something, make sure it's nice, or at least constructive feedback.... spouting straight up nonsensical crap to discourage someone trying their best is not the way to go...@BaconEggs
.
. At least his engines are at the right scale...
@EpicPigster1 Currently, Im running 8000% at 8x mass scale for the spring and 16x mass scale for the wheels. ...and my A340 is not even 1/4 of the realistic weight.
Funny thing is, his old profile pic was a pixel art. He asked me for help when designing it.
The below were some alternate designs we made as well. Design C 1 Design C 2
@jamesPLANESii Bang Bang shots fired! xD
...btw this was built 14 months ago. Back then I had limited knowledge and cant really build either, so no complaining. eks dee
祝你生日快乐。
Happy birthday.
@FasterThanLight
1. I'd recommend it being a successor so i dont lose your design and its easier to keep track of. However, if its not possible, dont worry.
2. Yes you can.
CLICK ME FOR 0.5X SCALED CRATES
@Swagginpiglet
Noice
Dammit @Awsomur
Dammit. I iz wanna block. Kek @Awsomur
A n d r o i d p l z
Undertandable. Good point.
However your forum post is lacking something... that is support for
andriod plz
@trolman "Normal Class: Yes, that includes you, android. These... ...."
Lucky... Meanwhile Im still runing on an acer laptop that has been somewhat modded for more storage and ram...
Adorable!
Litterally look further down the comments............ @villulennuk
@LiamW Yeah. Go for it! :) I can put it on autopilot and come back later xD
The max bonus points for extra crates is going to be 3. Since I don't want people to abuse the bonus point system by slapping on 5 crates. @Tully2001
I feel like the body is from someone's helicopter...
@zackattack316 No problem. Have fun!
CLICK ME FOR 0.5X SCALED CRATES
@zackattack316 Sure my friend.
@jamesPLANESii You can scale them down if you like.
@helilover03 Feel free to use two. Though one is recommended. Maybe i should give out bonus points for those who uses more than one xD
Oi noice
@PyrusEnderhunter September 15th.
@PyrusEnderhunter Ofcourse!
Hope i answered ur questions.
...and when people tag you on their builds for attention and upvotes.
@Botfinder @MrSilverWolf Shoot. My newest version of the airliner has a thrust to weight ratio of 8.41... 16 engines but 12 are cosmetic, providing 0 thrust.
I hate it when people spend hours on end making (in most cases,) a great replica or original design but has horrifically unrealistic maneuverability or speed. E.g. a cessna 172 with the speed of an airliner and maneuverability of an f22
K
C o n g r a t u l a t i o n s m y d u d e
@ThunderAircraft Nobody said they were. And it doesn't have to be under 300 parts if he doesn't want them to be.
yESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Moar steampunk plox
Absolutely amazing!
Yeah.... no @jamesPLANESii
@JetFly k thx
And plz tell me the model of dat heli or autogiro. I'm intrigued.
Bonjour, Hon hon hon hon. Funny thing is that learning French is mandatory up until grade 9 in Canada but I barely know how to speak a single sentence. Probably the only one I remember was "Puis je aller au toilet" or something along those lines. 😂
Ugh.... idk. I don't make military stuff xd. So, I'm everywhere 😈
@PhantomBladeCorp Da
So this is pretty much the Soviet Avro Arrow xD
This should be in off-topic. ...but i do admit, it scared the sh** out of me
@Kazin Nah, no worries. xD I think at this point, most of us share the same opinion that the nasty stuff should of been kept in ones head and not just spouted out... well, if one can word it so it sound more nicely as in a proper piece constructive criticism rather than an insult, that's a different story.
Noice. 100000x better than that PC-6 i made back in spring 2016...
"If you'd want my honest opinion, I don't really like it. Mainly because of performance, the 767 usually would rotate at around 160 knt which is around 180mph. Instead I went up at 230, and it couldn't even pitch up at 200mph. It also is very rough around some edges with the paint on it as well.
I also don't see the point in mentioning people if it's even worth it. I only click on things I'm interested in, and i only downloaded it to see how it would fly, not because it looked cool or anything."
"BaconEggs 3 May @ 12:45am
@bacon Because you think you’re infallible, you think the rules are for other people. You came after I did, now you have a higher rank out of blind luck, justifying you playing god. I had no choice, who I have on my friends list are people who actually understand the concept, not people who would be a complete dick on everything and think that it doesn’t have an impact at all. You didn’t care, you barely ever do."
Hypocrite much ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Nobody asked for your negativity. Show some respect for the dude who actually spend his time to make the aircraft, and the livery. If you're ganna say something, make sure it's nice, or at least constructive feedback.... spouting straight up nonsensical crap to discourage someone trying their best is not the way to go...@BaconEggs
.
.
At least his engines are at the right scale...
First!
That's stupid... and defeats the purpose of realism. @APimpNamedSlickback
Dank.exe
@EpicPigster1 Currently, Im running 8000% at 8x mass scale for the spring and 16x mass scale for the wheels. ...and my A340 is not even 1/4 of the realistic weight.
Heres a tip: Set the spring for 8000%, edit the mass scale accordingly. If it collapses, increase the mass scale on both the wheels and spring
Funny thing is, his old profile pic was a pixel art. He asked me for help when designing it.
The below were some alternate designs we made as well.
Design C 1
Design C 2
@jamesPLANESii Yeah sure xD
@jamesPLANESii Bang Bang shots fired! xD
...btw this was built 14 months ago. Back then I had limited knowledge and cant really build either, so no complaining. eks dee