"All entries MUST be mount able on an AIRCRAFT. NO SCALE MODELS of guns or infantry weaponry, unless if it is at a 1:1 scale." Umm, what if it already include the aircraft/ propulsion system already?
@ChiChiWerx To be honest, I'm not surprised that this thread is being bombarded by other users. Infinite fuel does help airliner and larger aircraft builders like me or BaconEggs a lot due to the impractical aspect of realistic fuel without making it fly like a brick. I think people mainly use infinite fuel to reduce weight, improve flight characteristics and produce less lag once over 700 parts; which i see nothing wrong in. ...and I get why people may get triggered by this post due to that.
@ChiChiWerx I agree. Also realistic acceleration. I have to mod the engine power and MaxMin settings to make sure my 256 feet airbus a340 doesn't have the acceleration of a Mclaren p1.
I'm very guilty of using infinite fuel tanks. However, there just isnt enough room on some of my planes to add a realistic amount of fuel while still keeping the weight and flight characteristics untouched. Since most of my planes are high in part count, adding weight to each individual fuselage sometimes just isn't practical, and can turn the framerate down quite a significant amount due to the weight. For other aircraft, since they're designed to fly long periods of time (e.g. +4 hours-16hours), realistic fuel can be simply obligated. For example, on my current Airbus A340, the thing has a large enough fuel tank already, and is designed for long range, so why not use a two part infinite fuel tank. Also, explain how I'm ganna fit 204000 liters of fuel onboard.
.
Although I like this idea of yours of preferring realistic fuel levels, sometimes it's just impracticable for some people.
.
This is just my opinion.
@EliteIndustries1 Indeed you didn't.
On a side note, you don't intimidate me. However, if you're trying to annoy me and be a little prick, you're actually doing a good job.
@Tully2001 Calling a mod in for me calling him stupid is like shooting himself in the foot for telling me to die. Lmao.
.
...and i resort to not block anyone if they provide sub-par and somewhat mediocre entertainment.
@EliteIndustries1 Here's a simple fix to the solution. Its called blocking.
(Included instructions for the intellectually impaired)
1. Find one of my comments.
2. Click that triangle button to the right of reply
3. Click "Block User"
4. Once at the confirmation screen, click the red button saying "Block User"
Done!
Simple fix for the socially incapable hypocrites!
@EliteIndustries1 Wow, I wasn't expecting your IQ to be so high to understand what salt is, I guess I underestimated myself. :) "ITS MYYYYNNNNNNNNNNNN"
...how about
I DON'T CARRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
@EliteIndustries1 How many times do I need to tell you that I don't give a crap about your negative feed back that makes no god dang sense. Nor do i care about if that's your tag or not...last time i checked, stuff on this website that is not otherwise publish by a user rightfully belongs to Simpleplanes - Website by Jundroo.
.
The tag is not called something like "Funny by eliteindustries1" for a reason child.
.
BTW, do something about this "problem" instead of throwing unwanted sodium chloride at my post. :)
@A3 OH MY GOD! Thats amazing how your school has an aviation class. (And the info on the top is the tip of the ice burg. My paper ended up being 5 pages front and back. LMAO)
@BogdanX Thanks for the feedback.
It is known that the craft is not very stable when the autogyration speed is quite low in the start, I'd be more than happy if you can find a way to fix such issue. :)
@TheLatentImage Rip. Feels bad how many times you have to click on Rick Astley daily.
I see a great builder here!
Well, not exactly, the "plane" is the bomb itself and the wings simply detach. I'll tag you on it to show u what I mean. @spefyjerbf
"All entries MUST be mount able on an AIRCRAFT. NO SCALE MODELS of guns or infantry weaponry, unless if it is at a 1:1 scale." Umm, what if it already include the aircraft/ propulsion system already?
HA! I just made one 2 days ago! Perfect.
I'm making the new acc. @ValtsuAircraftIndustries
If you have a computer, why are you asking me if lag is the issue. @landspeedcreator
Looks like minecraft
@landspeedcreator It sounds like you're getting me to do the entire exterior? Unfortunately I can't do that for you.
@Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing Look at my planes and figure out :)
@landspeedcreator What do you need help on exactly?
@ChiChiWerx To be honest, I'm not surprised that this thread is being bombarded by other users. Infinite fuel does help airliner and larger aircraft builders like me or BaconEggs a lot due to the impractical aspect of realistic fuel without making it fly like a brick. I think people mainly use infinite fuel to reduce weight, improve flight characteristics and produce less lag once over 700 parts; which i see nothing wrong in. ...and I get why people may get triggered by this post due to that.
@ChiChiWerx I agree. Also realistic acceleration. I have to mod the engine power and MaxMin settings to make sure my 256 feet airbus a340 doesn't have the acceleration of a Mclaren p1.
@TTHHSSSS That was the first thing i said as well.
XML mod and delete the line with the successor URL
I'm very guilty of using infinite fuel tanks. However, there just isnt enough room on some of my planes to add a realistic amount of fuel while still keeping the weight and flight characteristics untouched. Since most of my planes are high in part count, adding weight to each individual fuselage sometimes just isn't practical, and can turn the framerate down quite a significant amount due to the weight. For other aircraft, since they're designed to fly long periods of time (e.g. +4 hours-16hours), realistic fuel can be simply obligated. For example, on my current Airbus A340, the thing has a large enough fuel tank already, and is designed for long range, so why not use a two part infinite fuel tank. Also, explain how I'm ganna fit 204000 liters of fuel onboard.
.
Although I like this idea of yours of preferring realistic fuel levels, sometimes it's just impracticable for some people.
.
This is just my opinion.
Such A340, much beautiful, many wow
Much competition, such wow, many amaze.
Such self advertisement, much shame, many wow
@Sauce or copy the "ConHdE" in the url of https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/ConHdE/55-Part-Challenge and press CTRL+L in game.
OMG! You're back!!! Eyyyy welcome back man!
@Tully2001 K good night!
@Tully2001 Yeah. Do agree. Got myself #TRIGGERED when someone claims a public tag as theirs.
@EliteIndustries1 Self realization is the best kind of reflection. Have a nice day.
@EliteIndustries1 Indeed you didn't.
On a side note, you don't intimidate me. However, if you're trying to annoy me and be a little prick, you're actually doing a good job.
@Tully2001 Calling a mod in for me calling him stupid is like shooting himself in the foot for telling me to die. Lmao.
.
...and i resort to not block anyone if they provide sub-par and somewhat mediocre entertainment.
Delicious.
@EliteIndustries1 Here's a simple fix to the solution. Its called blocking.
(Included instructions for the intellectually impaired)
1. Find one of my comments.
2. Click that triangle button to the right of reply
3. Click "Block User"
4. Once at the confirmation screen, click the red button saying "Block User"
Done!
Simple fix for the socially incapable hypocrites!
@EliteIndustries1 Wow, I wasn't expecting your IQ to be so high to understand what salt is, I guess I underestimated myself. :)
"ITS MYYYYNNNNNNNNNNNN"
...how about
I DON'T CARRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE
@EliteIndustries1 How many times do I need to tell you that I don't give a crap about your negative feed back that makes no god dang sense. Nor do i care about if that's your tag or not...last time i checked, stuff on this website that is not otherwise publish by a user rightfully belongs to Simpleplanes - Website by Jundroo.
.
The tag is not called something like "Funny by eliteindustries1" for a reason child.
.
BTW, do something about this "problem" instead of throwing unwanted sodium chloride at my post. :)
@Ctracerx2 @ElGatoVolador @spefyjerbf
01010010 01100001 01110111 01110010
@zap210 I like both of your TBs. Both are very unique machines.
Name it "BaconAircraft is an idiot"
@EliteIndustries1
<> Give-a-&%$#-a-meter <>
1--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 10
|--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- |
Don't Care --- --- --- --- -- Care
|
I'm sitting at a -1 if that's possible.
Oh dear... My swift have a big chance of being pushed out of the market by this beauty,
@FlyingThings This is the Autogyro of Doom
@spasmsofjustice Yeah, It's a wonderful cockpit. I don't see any reasons of remaking one :)
@EliteIndustries1 I do. I have the rights for saying such, and you have to rights of rejecting my points. Therefore proving your point invalid.
@EliteIndustries1 You technically do. He has the right to complain, and you have to right to stop starting pointless arguments.
01011001 01100101 01110011 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01101111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01100010 01110101 01101001 01101100 01100100 01100101 01110010 00101110
@Tully2001 Unless you're in DPRK
@JordanPlayz101 No thanks.
This is what you Brits made, its uglier :)@Tully2001
I'm a soldier main, hate scouts. If I join a pub with too many scunts, I immediately switch to engie. @BaconRoll
@A3 OH MY GOD! Thats amazing how your school has an aviation class. (And the info on the top is the tip of the ice burg. My paper ended up being 5 pages front and back. LMAO)
@BogdanX That's cool.
@landspeedcreator No edits of autogyros can beat this
@BogdanX Thanks for the feedback.
It is known that the craft is not very stable when the autogyration speed is quite low in the start, I'd be more than happy if you can find a way to fix such issue. :)
@Alienbeef0421 Ah! That's not a hole, that's the inlet shrouding which was painted black.
@Alienbeef0421 Yes, united airlines for once didn't lag. ;)
@Alienbeef0421 No, it does not. Although there is i believe a 90 degree rotation on the wheel upon retraction in order to save space in the gear bay.