Unfortunately, the build looks nothing like a pre-dreadnought, the creator probably didn't even take a few minutes to read the part of my post where I presented the general design of pre-dreadnoughts.
While the builder specified that they are not good at building ships, during my evaluation I concluded that they didn't try much.
The build shows a clear lack of effort, further reinforced by the almost empty description, therefore I shall take no effort to evaluate it. Disqualified.
@Eggplant dont worry, I have no intention of removing any detail. I will simply make it more efficient (there are places where I was a bit wasteful at the beginning of the construction) so that it's still the same amount of detail but with fewer parts
@Alternation Indeed. I'd invite you to join but the deadline is literally today, so unless you can throw something together in 11 and half hours, it's too late unfortunately (which is a bummer, I think you could have made an awesome entry as well)
@HondaBoi200 Honda doesn't want their brand/name to be present on the website and they'd sue Jundroo if they don't remove any mention of their name from the website. So the moderators will most likely change your username and the title of this post too.
Living in a former eastern bloc country, I still see some Trabant 601s and Lada Rivas running around that I'm sure are not a common sight outside of the former eastern bloc
"Wait, wasn't this uploaded before?"
Yes indeed it was, and when I wanted to edit something in the description I accidentally missclicked and removed it, so I'm reuploading it now, sorry for this mistake
@Randomplayer I'm sad to hear that:(
I'll remove you from the list then but I still have some hope that maybe you'll upload a surprise entry before the deadline, don't give up!
@FOXHOUND26 Don't force yourself with the tumblehome if you find it hard. While it was quite common, many Pre-dreads didn't have it, and instead had fully vertical sides, for example IJN Mikasa or USS Indiana (BB-1), but the list goes on. So if you are making a fictional ship and not a replica, you don't have to waste too much time on a tumblehome if you don't like it that much:)
Since you are not in the Port SP server, and you said you'd join, I'm reminding you here that with today, only one month is left from the challenge. Good luck with your entries, I'm looking forward to them!
Since you are not in the Port SP server, and you said you'd join, I'm reminding you here that with today, only one month is left from the challenge. Good luck with your entries, I'm looking forward to them!
@Samfpanzer It uses an actual functional rudder (made with a wing) to steer while there is another wing inside the bottom of the hull to keep it from drifting sideways. the rest it just fine adjustment of these: size of the rudder wing, ship speed, rudder swing speed etc
@Samfpanzer Yup, I have four Austro-Hungarian ships on my build list actually:
- SMS Leitha, a river monitor that actually exists to this day and which I have already started work on (about 30% finished rn)
- SMS Zrínyi, a semi-dreadnought battleship
- SMS Budapest, a coastal defense battleship
- SMS Szent István remake, a dreadnought battleship (I've already built her before but that was many years ago and I want to make a newer version)
As others said, discord images no longer work (minus a few exceptions where I saw them still working for a few people but it's rare). I use Flickr for hosting now (I spent two days reuploading everything from discord lol), it's pretty reliable, but I heard ImgBB is good as well
I personally think it's not good to force the game if you dont feel like playing it. Im on a build hiatus too rn for the same reason.
But if you really want to build something before going on hiatus, I'd say maybe make a small regional prop airliner like the Bombardier Dash-8 (doesn't have to be a replica, just losely based on it)
Sounds like a simple relaxing build to me:)
@Samfpanzer Oh well, great then! I said it's comlpicated because there were quite a few times when someone asked for it and they had a hard time understanding it even when I tried to explain how it works, but I guess they were rookies with FT whereas you are not:)
@Samfpanzer I have a little FT code that does the trick. It'd be a bit too long and complicated to explain in one comment but I have a tutorial for it in the Port SP discord server. If you are interested, you can find an invite link in my bio
@Samfpanzer It just uses an overpowered gyro, you can find it hidden inside the first funnel. If you have problem with the ship drifting sideways after turning, then place a large structural wing on the bottom, the stretches almost the entire length of the ship, you can see it on my ship too
A little side info: The winner build probably should have been disqualified from the beginning, since it was taken from pacnelvonat's german vehicles pack with minor modifications and with no credit, and the rules of the challenge state that no stealing is allowed. Of course, it's up to KSB24 to decide if it was modified enough to not be considered stolen but I have a feeling he didn't even know that it was taken from someone else
Why does the autocredit direct to Alisuchanka's KV-2? (In fact, why do almost all of your builds direct to it, even ones that have no connection to it at all?)
@DatTrainGuy19 I still plan to make something like that sometime, but it's the same case as the Latécoère 631: the base is so old that at this point it'll be better to start it from scratch
@KAIST idk man, the website rules do forbid misleading thumbnails so if a mod sees this they might take it down if they deem it too misleading. maybe tag one of them and ask them if this is still acceptable or not, that's probably the best way to be sure
Isn't this thumbnail a bit misleading? you show the zwilling version on the thumbnail when this post is in fact the single cannon version and the zwilling is only linked in the description
Official evaluation
Beautiful work!
@Ijustwanttoenjoylife scrap what?
ㅤ
@Eggplant dont worry, I have no intention of removing any detail. I will simply make it more efficient (there are places where I was a bit wasteful at the beginning of the construction) so that it's still the same amount of detail but with fewer parts
Just a heads up: reuploading something with only the colors changed is against the website rules, the mods will most likely remove this
What did you change?
What did you change?
@Alternation Indeed. I'd invite you to join but the deadline is literally today, so unless you can throw something together in 11 and half hours, it's too late unfortunately (which is a bummer, I think you could have made an awesome entry as well)
@HondaBoi200 Honda doesn't want their brand/name to be present on the website and they'd sue Jundroo if they don't remove any mention of their name from the website. So the moderators will most likely change your username and the title of this post too.
@L1nus Sometime I do, but not too often lol
T
@DauntB Good to hear! You'll have to hurry tho, there is less than two weeks until the deadline
@SiBangsatYa Alright, thanks for letting me know
Living in a former eastern bloc country, I still see some Trabant 601s and Lada Rivas running around that I'm sure are not a common sight outside of the former eastern bloc
@FlyingPatriot I have a pretty beefy gaming laptop so fps is not much of a problem, only when I bring in some very high part count build
@FlyingPatriot I haven't experienced any issues so far
@FlyingPatriot All thumbnails show up properly for me
"Wait, wasn't this uploaded before?"
Yes indeed it was, and when I wanted to edit something in the description I accidentally missclicked and removed it, so I'm reuploading it now, sorry for this mistake
@FOXHOUND26 Alright then, Im sad to hear that but I understand. Thanks for letting me know
@Randomplayer I'm sad to hear that:(
I'll remove you from the list then but I still have some hope that maybe you'll upload a surprise entry before the deadline, don't give up!
@FOXHOUND26 Don't force yourself with the tumblehome if you find it hard. While it was quite common, many Pre-dreads didn't have it, and instead had fully vertical sides, for example IJN Mikasa or USS Indiana (BB-1), but the list goes on. So if you are making a fictional ship and not a replica, you don't have to waste too much time on a tumblehome if you don't like it that much:)
@FOXHOUND26
@Samfpanzer
Since you are not in the Port SP server, and you said you'd join, I'm reminding you here that with today, only one month is left from the challenge. Good luck with your entries, I'm looking forward to them!
@Tang0five
@Randomplayer
@ManIndustries
Since you are not in the Port SP server, and you said you'd join, I'm reminding you here that with today, only one month is left from the challenge. Good luck with your entries, I'm looking forward to them!
@AviationFanLithuanian You can't, it's a mod that's not available for mobile
@Samfpanzer Yes they are allowed
There will be no more updates, the devs announced it after the last update
@Samfpanzer It uses an actual functional rudder (made with a wing) to steer while there is another wing inside the bottom of the hull to keep it from drifting sideways. the rest it just fine adjustment of these: size of the rudder wing, ship speed, rudder swing speed etc
Looks damn good mate! Amazing work!
@Samfpanzer Yup, I have four Austro-Hungarian ships on my build list actually:
- SMS Leitha, a river monitor that actually exists to this day and which I have already started work on (about 30% finished rn)
- SMS Zrínyi, a semi-dreadnought battleship
- SMS Budapest, a coastal defense battleship
- SMS Szent István remake, a dreadnought battleship (I've already built her before but that was many years ago and I want to make a newer version)
As others said, discord images no longer work (minus a few exceptions where I saw them still working for a few people but it's rare). I use Flickr for hosting now (I spent two days reuploading everything from discord lol), it's pretty reliable, but I heard ImgBB is good as well
I personally think it's not good to force the game if you dont feel like playing it. Im on a build hiatus too rn for the same reason.
But if you really want to build something before going on hiatus, I'd say maybe make a small regional prop airliner like the Bombardier Dash-8 (doesn't have to be a replica, just losely based on it)
Sounds like a simple relaxing build to me:)
@Hoawdie Of course! :)
I'll add you to the list as well, I'm looking forward to your entry too!
The real fossil
@Samfpanzer Oh well, great then! I said it's comlpicated because there were quite a few times when someone asked for it and they had a hard time understanding it even when I tried to explain how it works, but I guess they were rookies with FT whereas you are not:)
Thank you for the submission, she looks great! Just a little suggestion: the correct prefix is IJN not Jin
@LJAircraftmanufacturer That's great! I'll add you to the list of participants then! I'm looking forward to your build!:)
@Samfpanzer I have a little FT code that does the trick. It'd be a bit too long and complicated to explain in one comment but I have a tutorial for it in the Port SP discord server. If you are interested, you can find an invite link in my bio
@Samfpanzer It just uses an overpowered gyro, you can find it hidden inside the first funnel. If you have problem with the ship drifting sideways after turning, then place a large structural wing on the bottom, the stretches almost the entire length of the ship, you can see it on my ship too
A little side info: The winner build probably should have been disqualified from the beginning, since it was taken from pacnelvonat's german vehicles pack with minor modifications and with no credit, and the rules of the challenge state that no stealing is allowed. Of course, it's up to KSB24 to decide if it was modified enough to not be considered stolen but I have a feeling he didn't even know that it was taken from someone else
@Sharkmanned There is no fuel: the ship uses custom built propellers that dont need any fuel
what exactly did you change?
@Ubyk123 That's literally the thing it uses, haven't you read the description?
@Ethantaing I won't
Why does the autocredit direct to Alisuchanka's KV-2? (In fact, why do almost all of your builds direct to it, even ones that have no connection to it at all?)
@DatTrainGuy19 I still plan to make something like that sometime, but it's the same case as the Latécoère 631: the base is so old that at this point it'll be better to start it from scratch
@KAIST idk man, the website rules do forbid misleading thumbnails so if a mod sees this they might take it down if they deem it too misleading. maybe tag one of them and ask them if this is still acceptable or not, that's probably the best way to be sure
Isn't this thumbnail a bit misleading? you show the zwilling version on the thumbnail when this post is in fact the single cannon version and the zwilling is only linked in the description
ㅤ