@JuanNotAnAlt Banal photo editor, built-in. No surprise there. Add a little blur, a little blueness, a little contrast, a little brightness reduction, and play with saturation (for different effects).
@GuyFolk No, there are also air brakes to keep it flying straight. But I didn't visualize them. But with a low throttle, the maneuverability of the airplane decreases.It's a problem, but it's not too much of a problem yet. No, I have all the control duplicated by aerodynamics. Although the TVC is the main control method on this airplane.
@UAIBrasil Yes, there are no stabilizers. And it can fly very strangely because of that. But it flies just fine. Because I was able to make normal code.
7500 H.P. ?
No, it's not realistic. I'll still look at it, but you risk getting kicked out. If you only have a problem with engine power, then I'll leave it. If you don't, then I won't clear you.
@JuanNotAnAlt Banal photo editor, built-in. No surprise there. Add a little blur, a little blueness, a little contrast, a little brightness reduction, and play with saturation (for different effects).
Т
@Xx24reminder yes. You in.
@Xx24reminder I don't remember you all. Send me the link, I'll take a look.
Ok. Enrolled.
@GuyFolk No, there are also air brakes to keep it flying straight. But I didn't visualize them. But with a low throttle, the maneuverability of the airplane decreases.It's a problem, but it's not too much of a problem yet. No, I have all the control duplicated by aerodynamics. Although the TVC is the main control method on this airplane.
Ok. Enrolled.
@UAIBrasil Yes, there are no stabilizers. And it can fly very strangely because of that. But it flies just fine. Because I was able to make normal code.
The plane is not ready yet. This is just a maneuverability test.
*GuyFolk might get nervous...
P. S. Don't ask where the stabilizers are.
Pfft, he'll do it at supersonic speed and tail forward.
@CommanderCanada you enrolled. It is ok.
@JaphetSkie @Aileen
It's not my system either. I took it myself. I said so in the description.
Ok. Enrolled.
7500 H.P. ?
No, it's not realistic. I'll still look at it, but you risk getting kicked out. If you only have a problem with engine power, then I'll leave it. If you don't, then I won't clear you.
Ok. Enrolled.
No, I can't call that realistic. No.
Ok. Enrolled.
@Aileen yes.
@Mrm19 yes.
Ok. Enrolled.
No. Is looks so weird. No.
Ok. Enrolled.
@Hiiamhere Yes, but I also demand realism (at least a little bit). It's too original. It's already out of my scope of the concept of "the plane".
Ok. Enrolled.
It looks stoned.
No, God, no. Please. No!
I won't be able to enroll it even under the magic mushrooms. No. Sorry.
Potat.
@chaillula62 yes. Yes.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
@Falco7 yes. Why no?
@Raiquaza19AirComp ok. No problem.
Now ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
Ok. Enrolled.
@Spearhead yes.
Realism has left the chat room. This is a violation of rule #8. I suggest that this be corrected in some way.
Ok. Enrolled.
@Spearhead Well, not banned, but you have to do something to make sure they're not imbalanced.
Ok. Enrolled.
@MrADS Waiting. Just wait. You are enrolled.
Me : it looks cool... I'll have to see how it flies.
Number of parts : 900+.
Me : Okay , I got it.
@LunchBox That's pretty good. You might end up in the top half of the list. But I haven't tested it yet.
And, yes... You could have given it a better title.
Ok. Enrolled.