Lol, in fact, Tiger 1 already has an 88mm anti-aircraft gun. And you just changed the tower. (The Germans liked the impact of the 88 mm KwK 36 anti-aircraft gun on Soviet tanks so much that they put this gun on Tiger 1.)
@asteroidbook345
Thanks for the advice, but I already figured out the problem. The rear turret design used too many attach points and the game was going crazy trying to load it.
I also made several independent files with this aircraft and saved them one by one. Thus, it is impossible to lose a lot of progress. But I still try to use fewer details.
In general, I do not give up and build it for the third time. Wait for it soon, and thanks for your understanding.
@WarshipDude I understand everything, but according to my rough calculations, your battleship would not have seen where it is firing at maximum range. That is, in a squadron battle, its range is useless because without reconnaissance it is impossible to fire beyond the viewing range. I have an idea: add a spotter plane as a decoration. He will explain the possibility of shooting out of sight
@NavalGunnery Unfortunately, in my fictional universe, only two such units have been built (this is described in the description in the sections ,, history ,, and ,, other ships of this series ,,). It would be better if cruisers of the type ,, fear ,, have coped (they have more barrels, and there are 7 built)
Link :https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/p2b14u/Cruiser-fear
@WarshipDude By the way, I want to say that the ship's hull does not consist of too many parts(Here are just over 30 details.) . I try to save them, and it is also difficult to work with a body with a lot of parts. I do it simply: I build the top layer (this ship consists of 3), copy it several times, reduce it as needed and adjust the float, there is also fuel (like ballast)
@WarshipDude Any number of anti-aircraft guns is normal for fictional ships. But for real life THIS IS A LOT of tools. Also note that half of the trunks are on the opposite side.
In your biography, you wrote that you love the ships of the Second World War. I have some ships for you to watch:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/dUEOPf/Cruiser-bear
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uld5M1/torpedo-boat-mosquito
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9P39H5/Anti-air-boat-Wasp
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/2i2uuu/destroyer-fury ( my first ship)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8bA0kK/Battleship-Devastator
@NavalGunnery
I'm glad you liked this ship, but I have better ships.
I'll be even happier if you clean up a few more of my ships:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/dUEOPf/Cruiser-bear : Cruiser
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uld5M1/torpedo-boat-mosquito : torpedo boat
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9P39H5/Anti-air-boat-Wasp : anti - air boat
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8bA0kK/Battleship-Devastator : battleship
I upgraded your plane, as you requested, here's a link to it :
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/cn7C31/remake-of-CrazyNumpty's-My-best-plane-yet
When improving it, I copied my other plane a little:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3eqot3/as_5
! (My changes to this plane are based on MY judgment of a good plane)!
Ok
Um ...?
@Pita
??? I’m dumb and didn’t understand what you meant ...
Lol, in fact, Tiger 1 already has an 88mm anti-aircraft gun. And you just changed the tower. (The Germans liked the impact of the 88 mm KwK 36 anti-aircraft gun on Soviet tanks so much that they put this gun on Tiger 1.)
@Pita
The plane with the bomb is ready.
Link:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/I28uU2/pe_8-FAB-5000
@Pita He's ready. Now I'm working on an "exclusive" for him (FAB 5000). WILL BE HARD
@asteroidbook345
Thanks for the advice, but I already figured out the problem. The rear turret design used too many attach points and the game was going crazy trying to load it.
I also made several independent files with this aircraft and saved them one by one. Thus, it is impossible to lose a lot of progress. But I still try to use fewer details.
In general, I do not give up and build it for the third time. Wait for it soon, and thanks for your understanding.
Um ...
What?
WWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWW
Crime should be punished, but so be it, I will not surrender you
@WarshipDude I understand everything, but according to my rough calculations, your battleship would not have seen where it is firing at maximum range. That is, in a squadron battle, its range is useless because without reconnaissance it is impossible to fire beyond the viewing range. I have an idea: add a spotter plane as a decoration. He will explain the possibility of shooting out of sight
@WarshipDude Now I have a time machine and your nagato on my already weird shopping list.
@WarshipDude Maybe you will, but I doubt your ship has such a range of vision
The ship looks good. I like. By the way I do a lot of ships too
@Mastermind1941 The game has a ricochet. I once managed to make 4 ricochets in a row from several tanks and the 5th from the ground.
@NavalGunnery Unfortunately, in my fictional universe, only two such units have been built (this is described in the description in the sections ,, history ,, and ,, other ships of this series ,,). It would be better if cruisers of the type ,, fear ,, have coped (they have more barrels, and there are 7 built)
Link :https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/p2b14u/Cruiser-fear
@WarshipDude By the way, I want to say that the ship's hull does not consist of too many parts(Here are just over 30 details.) . I try to save them, and it is also difficult to work with a body with a lot of parts. I do it simply: I build the top layer (this ship consists of 3), copy it several times, reduce it as needed and adjust the float, there is also fuel (like ballast)
@WarshipDude Any number of anti-aircraft guns is normal for fictional ships. But for real life THIS IS A LOT of tools. Also note that half of the trunks are on the opposite side.
Wait in the video. ;)
Wait in the video. At first glance it looks cool, but then we'll see
@JCCNtechnologies
WW2 fleet is better for demonstration of WW2 ships ( to north of Krakabloa)
@CamanderYEET
Yes, I used structural blocks, not fuselage blocks and I used a lot of them. It was my mistake, but still it was my FIRST ship.
In your biography, you wrote that you love the ships of the Second World War. I have some ships for you to watch:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/dUEOPf/Cruiser-bear
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uld5M1/torpedo-boat-mosquito
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9P39H5/Anti-air-boat-Wasp
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/2i2uuu/destroyer-fury ( my first ship)
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8bA0kK/Battleship-Devastator
Beautiful guns. I like
Cleaver?
Very cool ;)
@NavalGunnery
I'm glad you liked this ship, but I have better ships.
I'll be even happier if you clean up a few more of my ships:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/dUEOPf/Cruiser-bear : Cruiser
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/uld5M1/torpedo-boat-mosquito : torpedo boat
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9P39H5/Anti-air-boat-Wasp : anti - air boat
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/8bA0kK/Battleship-Devastator : battleship
2600 + parts? Ooh it is very hard
Good plane for a Chilovek with 0 points. I had MUCH worse.
I upgraded your plane, as you requested, here's a link to it :
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/cn7C31/remake-of-CrazyNumpty's-My-best-plane-yet
When improving it, I copied my other plane a little:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/3eqot3/as_5
! (My changes to this plane are based on MY judgment of a good plane)!
Can I build a tank destroyer
???
@metaphysicalgnome I am not good at painting