@PapaKernels
If you're asking for a review, well...
In terms of appearance, you could have done better detailing and picked a slightly better color. You could also play with the shape of the wing.
As a fighter of the 20s and 30s, it has good speed, while maintaining maneuverability. Good firepower for a fighter of that time and a bomb load of 200 kg make it a very dangerous aircraft for the enemy.
The plane has good optimization in terms of details. Also, the landing gear looks good and the cockpit is cool. Also liked the bombs. I can note the detailed description of the plane, with a story about the controls and screenshots. Not a bad picture.
I could do this for all planes, but I would die and test it until early fall.
@BeastHunter Your plane is the only VTOL. And the cool features have points for that as well. All 3 you got for this mechanism. It's simple and I couldn't give more.
I like the logic of the designers: So, we have the gun on the right. So on the left we will put the driver. And the gunner right behind him. The gunner can't see anything, but we don't care about that. We'll give the commander a good view. But only backwards. And the loader right behind the gun. And let's make it so that the shells have to be loaded into the gun on the right, and stand on the left. And reach. These shells will also be loaded from the right. "Squerish, praktish, discomfortish." - the motto of the German designers.
@JuanNotAnAlt Banal photo editor, built-in. No surprise there. Add a little blur, a little blueness, a little contrast, a little brightness reduction, and play with saturation (for different effects).
@GuyFolk No, there are also air brakes to keep it flying straight. But I didn't visualize them. But with a low throttle, the maneuverability of the airplane decreases.It's a problem, but it's not too much of a problem yet. No, I have all the control duplicated by aerodynamics. Although the TVC is the main control method on this airplane.
@UAIBrasil Yes, there are no stabilizers. And it can fly very strangely because of that. But it flies just fine. Because I was able to make normal code.
@StormHuskyy No, these engines didn't have a TVS.
All tags from teasers.
@CattoTheMobileFriendly
@Strikercritsilver @RandomUser09 @ShinyGemsBro
+2@BeastHunter @TatsuTheOtaku @Wibbley
Т
@RC1138Boss no
@Fellex How subtle...
@PapaKernels THX
+1@ShinyGemsBro ok.
Tag me on next.
@ShinyGemsBro Actively produced. Modifications are possible. No problem we can give you a couple of pieces for a test drive.
@Nofferston
+1It is ready. U can check it.
@Tankistrus37 я разошёлся со скринами. И с историей. И с управлением. И с вооружением. На меня просто накатило очень много вдохновения.
+2@djokir это здесь при чём?
+1All tags requested.
@TatsuTheOtaku
@TheHaggisBasher
@BeastHunter
@simpleplayer1
Beauty on a track.
Can you make a copy of my tank? It's not ready yet, it's in the final stages of work, but I can give you the unlisted link.
+2@Riskitforabiscuit no, I used BP of la-9.(and LA-11,lol)
@PapaKernels For metallic it needed more gray. It's too white.
@PapaKernels
If you're asking for a review, well...
In terms of appearance, you could have done better detailing and picked a slightly better color. You could also play with the shape of the wing.
As a fighter of the 20s and 30s, it has good speed, while maintaining maneuverability. Good firepower for a fighter of that time and a bomb load of 200 kg make it a very dangerous aircraft for the enemy.
The plane has good optimization in terms of details. Also, the landing gear looks good and the cockpit is cool. Also liked the bombs. I can note the detailed description of the plane, with a story about the controls and screenshots. Not a bad picture.
I could do this for all planes, but I would die and test it until early fall.
+2@BeastHunter Your plane is the only VTOL. And the cool features have points for that as well. All 3 you got for this mechanism. It's simple and I couldn't give more.
+2GuyFolk, the teaser master.
For what?
I like the logic of the designers: So, we have the gun on the right. So on the left we will put the driver. And the gunner right behind him. The gunner can't see anything, but we don't care about that. We'll give the commander a good view. But only backwards. And the loader right behind the gun. And let's make it so that the shells have to be loaded into the gun on the right, and stand on the left. And reach. These shells will also be loaded from the right. "Squerish, praktish, discomfortish." - the motto of the German designers.
+5Hetzer.
+1@Hawker180hurricane Yeah, but I haven't been in for a while.
@tucan yes, sorry.
@DustofPrey emm... No. It available.
@Thunderhawk check ur Internet.
Tokyo Drift in the Air.
The impossible has happened... New update!!!
+769 applications. Noise.
Challenge closed. No applications will be accepted. Expect results soon. You will be tagged on the results post.
Ok. Enrolled.
@JuanNotAnAlt Banal photo editor, built-in. No surprise there. Add a little blur, a little blueness, a little contrast, a little brightness reduction, and play with saturation (for different effects).
Т
@Xx24reminder yes. You in.
@Xx24reminder I don't remember you all. Send me the link, I'll take a look.
Ok. Enrolled.
@GuyFolk No, there are also air brakes to keep it flying straight. But I didn't visualize them. But with a low throttle, the maneuverability of the airplane decreases.It's a problem, but it's not too much of a problem yet. No, I have all the control duplicated by aerodynamics. Although the TVC is the main control method on this airplane.
Ok. Enrolled.
@Sm1leyFaCe
+1You're back!
@UAIBrasil Yes, there are no stabilizers. And it can fly very strangely because of that. But it flies just fine. Because I was able to make normal code.
The plane is not ready yet. This is just a maneuverability test.
*GuyFolk might get nervous...
P. S. Don't ask where the stabilizers are.
Pfft, he'll do it at supersonic speed and tail forward.
Noice!
+1@CommanderCanada you enrolled. It is ok.
GuyFolk : Finally, a worthy opponent! Our battle will be legendary!
+3@JaphetSkie @Aileen
It's not my system either. I took it myself. I said so in the description.