@SuperSuperTheSylph missiles can oftentimes be evaded without flares as long as you’re maneuverable enough. Rather than flying around all insane, wait until the missile is just about to impact, and then at the last second, pull off from your main flight path and the missile should overshoot you. Typically this works in dogfights where the opposing aircraft isn’t too heavily decked out with missiles, but with more densely armed aircrafts, it doesn’t work as well due to the sheer volume of missiles they can throw at you.
@Ownedpilot for Simpleplanes, that’s asking a bit much. I’m afraid this is the best we can get as of now, so you’ll have to live with it. Still better than the default car engine noises.
Also I’m not really very good with car anatomy lol, I’m better with planes as are most people on this website
@AvalonIndustries ok, that makes more sense. But in all seriousness, what is the thickest armor it has, and how would it theoretically stand up to a 650mm. APCR RailCannon Spike moving at almost Mach 10? Just out of curiosity?
@AvalonIndustries 2,000cm? Is there a translation error somewhere in this statement, because that’s literally 65ft. of armor, this tank isn’t moving anywhere fast if it’s armor is that damn thick.
I know it isn’t exactly SimplePlanes, but it’s certainly appropriate for the website! We saw these today at a parade we went to, and I was pleasantly surprised by the smoke trail on the last aircraft in formation! I’ve never seen them do that in these parades, and it was an awesome experience!
@TomTomthebrazil idk why of all people you asked me to rate this, but out of 10, I’d give it a six. Idk what specifically you’re asking me to rate, so I’ll list everything I can; the maneuverability is plausible, it’s not the most agile thing in the world, and can’t really pull sharp turns for what it is. Still flies nicely though, it can certainly fly. As for the weaponry, I have several questions. First of all, how come every weapon has the explosive force of a small nuclear device? That’s not really how it should work. Second of all, why are there torpedos on a fighter jet? That just doesn’t make any sense, but I guess this is SimplePlanes after all. Not much here really makes any sense in the first place. Additionally, the landing gear placement is a little off, the rear landing gear should be closer to the center of mass, rather than far behind it. Take a look at the F-16’s landing gear setup, and it should make sense. One final note, the guns are a little excessive, there shouldn’t really be any more than one gun on a modern fighter aircraft, sometimes there are two on earlier designs, but this is rare.
@AeroAeroTheMen An ornithopter is a type of aircraft that uses the principles of flight followed by birds and other avian creatures; flapping wings to stay aloft. For instance, this is a great example.
I know the sound isn’t entirely accurate, and it sounds more like a motorcycle on cocaine than anything else, but man! This is by far one of the closest times we’ve ever come to improved engine noises in SP, other than the usual car engine noise, and/or using default prop engines and stuff to create something that sounds reminiscent of a gasoline engine.
@TigerEye35 oh you have no idea. The weirdest YouTube videos you’ll ever see are chock-filled with things that are popular like that, except they’re manipulated in a way that makes children want to see it even more, like Sirenhead in Minecraft or Fortnite or some other weird shit, and there’s like 50 different versions of it. It’s a really weird rabbit hole, I don’t recommend going down it unless you’re genuinely curious lol
@TigerEye35 I kinda feel like that’s less of a copycat situation, and more of a coincidence. Your content seems to pertain directly to younger audiences by using current trends from influencers that drag influenceable children towards it. With the Sirenhead stuff, Henderson himself only made it because it’s the stuff that he likes. But other channels and groups soon found out how many people also like it, so they made content based off of it, some good, some bad, and others just plain weird. Actually no, most of it is just plain weird. So to recap, it’s less stealing, and more coincidence due to common pertaining and media. Although, some of your edits are a little funny I’ll admit.
@Irobert55 alrighty then, if you want to complain about it then plead to Sadboye12 to make an 8-legged version, heaven forbid a spider in a stupid meme video I made have less than 8 legs.
I also saw a Handley Page Victor on the website, they made a mistake in the pricing; they priced it at roughly $300.00, but they should’ve made it “not for sale” because the HPV is a priceless beauty of aviation, complete and utter badassery in the form of a bomber aircraft.
@Merchavinodesfri02 well both are heavily armored, enough to withstand an artillery round. The XFWB is just a bomber, while the XFWAC is an aircraft carrier.
@VViiMini thanks, to explain the process in a rushed but makes-sense manner:
• First, I load the desired aircraft into the game, and I try to match the time of day in game to the time of day in the photo, for proper lighting effects.
• Next, I create a transparent image of the plane, by erasing all background elements, and carefully tracing the plane (or other vehicle) out of the screenshot.
• After that, I paste the image into the photo and position it in a way that makes it look nice, however that may be.
• Then, I add a myriad of effects to really bring it to life; in the images I created for you, I added blur effects to the outline of the aircraft(s), which blends them into the photo a little nicer, and it really makes them look like they’re part of the photo. Sometimes I’ll add more dynamic effects too, as in the T-33 photo, I gave it wing vortices to create a sense of movement in the photo. I’ll also add shadows when possible, as shows in these images. It’s easier to see the shadow in the bomber photo, but if you look on the ground in the other photo, you can see the small shadow just barely on the ground.
@VViiMini here are the images you requested, I hope I did them right, or atleast in a way that you like. It is a bit difficult to create these, so it’d be a bit of a hassle to redo them.
Heccin’ Chonccer
T
Underrated
Also the stock P-51 probably isn’t the best thing to mount this on, but atleast it looks kinda funny I think
This is it folks, the single best SU-57 on the entire website. Guyfolk, you never cease to amaze us!
@SuperSuperTheSylph missiles can oftentimes be evaded without flares as long as you’re maneuverable enough. Rather than flying around all insane, wait until the missile is just about to impact, and then at the last second, pull off from your main flight path and the missile should overshoot you. Typically this works in dogfights where the opposing aircraft isn’t too heavily decked out with missiles, but with more densely armed aircrafts, it doesn’t work as well due to the sheer volume of missiles they can throw at you.
I love this idea
Blue tires
This deserves more attention
If the jack of all trades is master of none, then what would the master of all be?
@Amgtkids you have to have more points than the user you’re trying to spotlight, so I’m afraid you’re about 72,000 points off.
@Juanfly154 oh hell yeah!
I can do that easily in a SU-47 Berkut, very fun indeed
@Ownedpilot for Simpleplanes, that’s asking a bit much. I’m afraid this is the best we can get as of now, so you’ll have to live with it. Still better than the default car engine noises.
Also I’m not really very good with car anatomy lol, I’m better with planes as are most people on this website
T
@AvalonIndustries ok, that makes more sense. But in all seriousness, what is the thickest armor it has, and how would it theoretically stand up to a 650mm. APCR RailCannon Spike moving at almost Mach 10? Just out of curiosity?
@AvalonIndustries 2,000cm? Is there a translation error somewhere in this statement, because that’s literally 65ft. of armor, this tank isn’t moving anywhere fast if it’s armor is that damn thick.
@50CalChicken awesome! I imagine there were lots of T-6 Texans?
I know it isn’t exactly SimplePlanes, but it’s certainly appropriate for the website! We saw these today at a parade we went to, and I was pleasantly surprised by the smoke trail on the last aircraft in formation! I’ve never seen them do that in these parades, and it was an awesome experience!
Only 450 parts? That’s new! Wonderful aircraft, there aren’t enough push-props on the website IMO.
@TomTomthebrazil idk why of all people you asked me to rate this, but out of 10, I’d give it a six. Idk what specifically you’re asking me to rate, so I’ll list everything I can; the maneuverability is plausible, it’s not the most agile thing in the world, and can’t really pull sharp turns for what it is. Still flies nicely though, it can certainly fly. As for the weaponry, I have several questions. First of all, how come every weapon has the explosive force of a small nuclear device? That’s not really how it should work. Second of all, why are there torpedos on a fighter jet? That just doesn’t make any sense, but I guess this is SimplePlanes after all. Not much here really makes any sense in the first place. Additionally, the landing gear placement is a little off, the rear landing gear should be closer to the center of mass, rather than far behind it. Take a look at the F-16’s landing gear setup, and it should make sense. One final note, the guns are a little excessive, there shouldn’t really be any more than one gun on a modern fighter aircraft, sometimes there are two on earlier designs, but this is rare.
@AeroAeroTheMen An ornithopter is a type of aircraft that uses the principles of flight followed by birds and other avian creatures; flapping wings to stay aloft. For instance, this is a great example.
@MintLynx it’s not my own build, I just added the trick onto it for maximum fun. I don’t remember who made it, but it’s called the Aquilia CR-1.
I know the sound isn’t entirely accurate, and it sounds more like a motorcycle on cocaine than anything else, but man! This is by far one of the closest times we’ve ever come to improved engine noises in SP, other than the usual car engine noise, and/or using default prop engines and stuff to create something that sounds reminiscent of a gasoline engine.
@TigerEye35 oh you have no idea. The weirdest YouTube videos you’ll ever see are chock-filled with things that are popular like that, except they’re manipulated in a way that makes children want to see it even more, like Sirenhead in Minecraft or Fortnite or some other weird shit, and there’s like 50 different versions of it. It’s a really weird rabbit hole, I don’t recommend going down it unless you’re genuinely curious lol
@TigerEye35 I kinda feel like that’s less of a copycat situation, and more of a coincidence. Your content seems to pertain directly to younger audiences by using current trends from influencers that drag influenceable children towards it. With the Sirenhead stuff, Henderson himself only made it because it’s the stuff that he likes. But other channels and groups soon found out how many people also like it, so they made content based off of it, some good, some bad, and others just plain weird. Actually no, most of it is just plain weird. So to recap, it’s less stealing, and more coincidence due to common pertaining and media. Although, some of your edits are a little funny I’ll admit.
@Irobert55 alrighty then, if you want to complain about it then plead to Sadboye12 to make an 8-legged version, heaven forbid a spider in a stupid meme video I made have less than 8 legs.
@Tully2 then how about you go “cri” about it
@Irobert55 I didn’t make this, and besides, it has two legs up front used for grabbing and smashing, so technically it does have 8 legs.
@Tookan Hans,
”get ze flamenwerfer.”
@Tookan too late...
@Tookan here
I also saw a Handley Page Victor on the website, they made a mistake in the pricing; they priced it at roughly $300.00, but they should’ve made it “not for sale” because the HPV is a priceless beauty of aviation, complete and utter badassery in the form of a bomber aircraft.
What have I done
@Merchavinodesfri02 well both are heavily armored, enough to withstand an artillery round. The XFWB is just a bomber, while the XFWAC is an aircraft carrier.
@VViiMini thanks, to explain the process in a rushed but makes-sense manner:
• First, I load the desired aircraft into the game, and I try to match the time of day in game to the time of day in the photo, for proper lighting effects.
• Next, I create a transparent image of the plane, by erasing all background elements, and carefully tracing the plane (or other vehicle) out of the screenshot.
• After that, I paste the image into the photo and position it in a way that makes it look nice, however that may be.
• Then, I add a myriad of effects to really bring it to life; in the images I created for you, I added blur effects to the outline of the aircraft(s), which blends them into the photo a little nicer, and it really makes them look like they’re part of the photo. Sometimes I’ll add more dynamic effects too, as in the T-33 photo, I gave it wing vortices to create a sense of movement in the photo. I’ll also add shadows when possible, as shows in these images. It’s easier to see the shadow in the bomber photo, but if you look on the ground in the other photo, you can see the small shadow just barely on the ground.
@VViiMini here are the images you requested, I hope I did them right, or atleast in a way that you like. It is a bit difficult to create these, so it’d be a bit of a hassle to redo them.
That moment when the anime girl in the thumbnail is more detailed than the plane itself
(atleast I think it’s a girl, who knows man lmfao)
Holy cow those look like actual photos, that is absolutely incredible!
@VViiMini aight
@PoinX25tlessWhyShouldI I have my doubts
@Dathcha exactly, this is no videogame, and no videogame can ever accurately represent the true reality of stuff like this.
@blackhattaircraft is this your ride?
Now someone needs to make a potato subbed out for a Dassault Rafale, to see what it’s really capable of!
This looks like a lot more parts than it actually is, great part efficiency!
@VViiMini would you like them in formation?
@Tookan it’s not my AC-130, I think WIZARD2017 made it
Big Chungsus
You really couldn’t’ve picked a better name?
@Amgtkids I literally put it in my previous comment, click the blue text that says “Here”